IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v361y2024ics0306261924003593.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Levelized cost of driving for medium and heavy-duty battery electric trucks

Author

Listed:
  • Jahangir Samet, Mehdi
  • Liimatainen, Heikki
  • Pihlatie, Mikko
  • van Vliet, Oscar Patrick René

Abstract

The total cost of ownership (TCO) of trucks is known as one of the main decision-making factors by logistics operators for adopting alternative powertrains such as battery electric trucks (BETs). In this study, we develop a very detailed levelized cost of driving (LCOD) model to analyse the TCO of BETs and conventional trucks (CTs) in medium and heavy-duty truck weight classes. The model has methodological advancements such as developing opportunity costs for charging activities, using a detailed operational time calculation, and analysing the optimum driving ranges or battery sizing. By implementing an extensive sensitivity analysis of LCOD for CTs and BETs over 43 variables, it is revealed that the key parameters such as operational driving range, battery pack price, state of charge of battery, driver cost, “mid-shift” charging power, ambient temperature, opportunity charging, and driving speed have major impacts on the cost competitiveness of BETs vs. CTs. In addition, the impact of battery and charging technology improvements as well as designing optimum driving ranges are examined in three different operational trip profiles (urban, short-haul or regional, long-haul). The result shows that: 1) BETs in urban trip profiles with the current and/or short-term battery technology might be economically viable alternatives for CTs without the help of the policy measures, 2) BETs with below 40 t gross vehicle weight and the long-term improvements in battery technology in all the operational trip profiles might be economically viable alternatives for CTs without the help of the policy measures, and 3) the implementation of policy measures affecting the relative costs of CTs and BETs and development of fast-charging facilities would be needed to support the above 40 t BETs in short-haul and long-haul trips for the current and/or short-term as well as mid-term battery technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jahangir Samet, Mehdi & Liimatainen, Heikki & Pihlatie, Mikko & van Vliet, Oscar Patrick René, 2024. "Levelized cost of driving for medium and heavy-duty battery electric trucks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 361(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:361:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924003593
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924003593
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122976?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gunawan, Tubagus Aryandi & Monaghan, Rory F.D., 2022. "Techno-econo-environmental comparisons of zero- and low-emission heavy-duty trucks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    2. Burke, Andrew & Sinha, Anish Kumar, 2020. "Technology, Sustainability, and Marketing of Battery Electric and Hydrogen Fuel Cell Medium-Duty and Heavy-Duty Trucks and Buses in 2020-2040," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt7s25d8bc, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    3. Liimatainen, Heikki & Pöllänen, Markus, 2010. "Trends of energy efficiency in Finnish road freight transport 1995-2009 and forecast to 2016," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(12), pages 7676-7686, December.
    4. Fulton, Lew & Cazzola, Pierpaolo & Cuenot, François, 2009. "IEA Mobility Model (MoMo) and its use in the ETP 2008," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 3758-3768, October.
    5. Hao, Xu & Ou, Shiqi & Lin, Zhenhong & He, Xin & Bouchard, Jessey & Wang, Hewu & Li, Liguo, 2022. "Evaluating the current perceived cost of ownership for buses and trucks in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    6. Noll, Bessie & del Val, Santiago & Schmidt, Tobias S. & Steffen, Bjarne, 2022. "Analyzing the competitiveness of low-carbon drive-technologies in road-freight: A total cost of ownership analysis in Europe," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PB).
    7. Moon, Saedaseul & Lee, Deok-Joo, 2019. "An optimal electric vehicle investment model for consumers using total cost of ownership: A real option approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Mehrnaz Farzam Far & Mikko Pihlatie & Marko Paakkinen & Marko Antila & Aida Abdulah, 2022. "Pre-Normative Charging Technology Roadmap for Heavy-Duty Electric Vehicles in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-24, March.
    9. Juan C. González Palencia & Van Tuan Nguyen & Mikiya Araki & Seiichi Shiga, 2020. "The Role of Powertrain Electrification in Achieving Deep Decarbonization in Road Freight Transport," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, May.
    10. Donkyu Baek & Yukai Chen & Naehyuck Chang & Enrico Macii & Massimo Poncino, 2020. "Optimal Battery Sizing for Electric Truck Delivery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bakker, J. & Lopez Alvarez, J.A. & Buijs, P., 2024. "A network design perspective on the adoption potential of electric road systems in early development stages," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 361(C).
    2. Brand, Christian, 2016. "Beyond ‘Dieselgate’: Implications of unaccounted and future air pollutant emissions and energy use for cars in the United Kingdom," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 1-12.
    3. Johannes Karlsson & Anders Grauers, 2023. "Agent-Based Investigation of Charger Queues and Utilization of Public Chargers for Electric Long-Haul Trucks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-25, June.
    4. Koetse, Mark J. & Hoen, Anco, 2014. "Preferences for alternative fuel vehicles of company car drivers," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 279-301.
    5. Mehdi Jahangir Samet & Heikki Liimatainen & Oscar Patrick René van Vliet & Markus Pöllänen, 2021. "Road Freight Transport Electrification Potential by Using Battery Electric Trucks in Finland and Switzerland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Ren, Lei & Zhou, Sheng & Peng, Tianduo & Ou, Xunmin, 2022. "Greenhouse gas life cycle analysis of China's fuel cell medium- and heavy-duty trucks under segmented usage scenarios and vehicle types," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    7. Palander, Teijo & Haavikko, Hanna & Kärhä, Kalle, 2018. "Towards sustainable wood procurement in forest industry – The energy efficiency of larger and heavier vehicles in Finland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 100-118.
    8. Mariano Gallo & Mario Marinelli, 2023. "The Use of Hydrogen for Traction in Freight Transport: Estimating the Reduction in Fuel Consumption and Emissions in a Regional Context," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, January.
    9. Minglu Ma & Qiang Wang, 2022. "Assessment and Forecast of Green Total Factor Energy Efficiency in the Yellow River Basin—A Perspective Distinguishing the Upper, Middle and Lower Stream," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, February.
    10. Virág, Doris & Wiedenhofer, Dominik & Baumgart, André & Matej, Sarah & Krausmann, Fridolin & Min, Jihoon & Rao, Narasimha D. & Haberl, Helmut, 2022. "How much infrastructure is required to support decent mobility for all? An exploratory assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    11. Bosetti, Valentina & Longden, Thomas, 2013. "Light duty vehicle transportation and global climate policy: The importance of electric drive vehicles," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 209-219.
    12. Mulholland, Eamonn & Teter, Jacob & Cazzola, Pierpaolo & McDonald, Zane & Ó Gallachóir, Brian P., 2018. "The long haul towards decarbonising road freight – A global assessment to 2050," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 678-693.
    13. Koji Tokimatsu & Shinsuke Murakami & Tsuyoshi Adachi & Ryota Ii & Rieko Yasuoka & Masahiro Nishio, 2017. "Long-term demand and supply of non-ferrous mineral resources by a mineral balance model," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 30(3), pages 193-206, October.
    14. Fabio Luis Marques dos Santos & Paolo Tecchio & Fulvio Ardente & Ferenc Pekár, 2021. "User Automotive Powertrain-Type Choice Model and Analysis Using Neural Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    15. Ruzzenenti, Franco & Basosi, Riccardo, 2017. "Modelling the rebound effect with network theory: An insight into the European freight transport sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 272-283.
    16. Brand, Christian & Anable, Jillian & Tran, Martino, 2013. "Accelerating the transformation to a low carbon passenger transport system: The role of car purchase taxes, feebates, road taxes and scrappage incentives in the UK," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 132-148.
    17. Matteo Prussi & Lorenzo Laveneziana & Lorenzo Testa & David Chiaramonti, 2022. "Comparing e-Fuels and Electrification for Decarbonization of Heavy-Duty Transports," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-17, October.
    18. Piotr Bielaczyc & Rafal Sala & Tomasz Meinicke, 2021. "Analysis of Technical Capabilities, Methodology and Test Results of a Light-Commercial Vehicle Conversion to Battery Electric Powertrain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    19. Holden, R. & Xu, B. & Greening, P. & Piecyk, M. & Dadhich, P., 2016. "Towards a common measure of greenhouse gas related logistics activity using data envelopment analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 105-119.
    20. Jamila Hemdani & Laid Degaa & Moez Soltani & Nassim Rizoug & Achraf Jabeur Telmoudi & Abdelkader Chaari, 2022. "Battery Lifetime Prediction via Neural Networks with Discharge Capacity and State of Health," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-17, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:361:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924003593. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.