IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v323y2022ics0306261922008935.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CO2 utilization and sequestration in Reservoir: Effects and mechanisms of CO2 electrochemical reduction

Author

Listed:
  • Chai, Rukuan
  • Liu, Yuetian
  • Wang, Jingru
  • Liu, Qianjun
  • Rui, Zhenhua

Abstract

Owing to the harmful consequences of the greenhouse effect, mankind has reached a consensus to reduce CO2 emissions. CO2 utilization and sequestration is considered the most feasible solution for realizing an effective and economical sequestration of CO2. Herein, CO2-enhanced oil recovery (EOR) is a representative strategy owing to its tremendous sequestration capacity and reasonable economic viability. However, the low sequestration stability and the accompanying secondary disasters have hindered its wider application. Considering this, a novel CO2 utilization and sequestration technology, i.e., CO2 electrochemical reduction (CO2RR)-EOR technology was proposed and its effects and mechanisms were studied. First, a SnO2 catalyst that can be used in the coreflooding experiments was synthesized and its efficiency on CO2RR was evaluated. Then, coreflooding experiments using the SnO2 catalyst were conducted to study the influence of CO2RR on the CO2 sequestration and oil recovery. Next, contact angle and interfacial tension were measured to analyze the effect of the CO2RR on the CO2-crude oil-brine-rock interaction. Finally, the CO2RR-EOR mechanism was proposed. Multiple experiments revealed that the low-cost and easy-synthesis SnO2 catalyst, which was characterized by the 3-dimensioned hierarchical and porous structure, was in the high efficiency and strong stability. Coreflooding results illustrated that the CO2RR remarkably enhanced CO2 sequestration and oil recovery. At the optimal cell potential of 3.75 V, the CO2 sequestration efficiency and oil recovery were as high as 75.93% and 43.8%, respectively, which are much higher than those (50.56% and 37.9%, respectively) achieved in conventional CO2 flooding. Contact angle and interfacial tension results indicated that the CO2RR has a significant impact on the CO2-crude oil-brine-rock interaction. At the optimal cell potential, the crude oil-contact angle and the interfacial tension were 36.2° and 8.9 mN/m, respectively, which are much lower than those (64.6° and 16.4 mN/m, respectively) achieved in conventional CO2 flooding; the CO2-contact angle was 52.2°, which too is much larger than that (31.7°) achieved in conventional CO2 flooding. In this technology, the CO2RR converts the injected CO2 into formate to sequestrate itself, and meanwhile alters the CO2-crude oil-brine-rock interactions, resulting in enhanced CO2 wettability and consequently increases CO2 trapping and retention; causing the weakened oil wettability and the enhanced oil-brine interaction, and finally enhances oil recovery. CO2RR-EOR can be a novel, efficient, and economically-viable CO2 utilization and sequestration technology, which provide a feasible option for the future industrial CO2 emission reduction.

Suggested Citation

  • Chai, Rukuan & Liu, Yuetian & Wang, Jingru & Liu, Qianjun & Rui, Zhenhua, 2022. "CO2 utilization and sequestration in Reservoir: Effects and mechanisms of CO2 electrochemical reduction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:323:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922008935
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119584
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261922008935
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119584?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Yueliang & Rui, Zhenhua & Yang, Tao & Dindoruk, Birol, 2022. "Using propanol as an additive to CO2 for improving CO2 utilization and storage in oil reservoirs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    2. Cameron Hepburn & Ella Adlen & John Beddington & Emily A. Carter & Sabine Fuss & Niall Mac Dowell & Jan C. Minx & Pete Smith & Charlotte K. Williams, 2019. "The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal," Nature, Nature, vol. 575(7781), pages 87-97, November.
    3. Shu-Yuan Pan & Yi-Hung Chen & Liang-Shih Fan & Hyunook Kim & Xiang Gao & Tung-Chai Ling & Pen-Chi Chiang & Si-Lu Pei & Guowei Gu, 2020. "CO2 mineralization and utilization by alkaline solid wastes for potential carbon reduction," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 3(5), pages 399-405, May.
    4. Cui, Guodong & Wang, Yi & Rui, Zhenhua & Chen, Bailian & Ren, Shaoran & Zhang, Liang, 2018. "Assessing the combined influence of fluid-rock interactions on reservoir properties and injectivity during CO2 storage in saline aquifers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 281-296.
    5. Tufa, Ramato Ashu & Chanda, Debabrata & Ma, Ming & Aili, David & Demissie, Taye Beyene & Vaes, Jan & Li, Qingfeng & Liu, Shanhu & Pant, Deepak, 2020. "Towards highly efficient electrochemical CO2 reduction: Cell designs, membranes and electrocatalysts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    6. Zhang, Zhien & Pan, Shu-Yuan & Li, Hao & Cai, Jianchao & Olabi, Abdul Ghani & Anthony, Edward John & Manovic, Vasilije, 2020. "Recent advances in carbon dioxide utilization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    7. Fu, Yishu & Li, Yanan & Zhang, Xia & Liu, Yuyu & Qiao, Jinli & Zhang, Jiujun & Wilkinson, David P., 2016. "Novel hierarchical SnO2 microsphere catalyst coated on gas diffusion electrode for enhancing energy efficiency of CO2 reduction to formate fuel," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 536-544.
    8. Juan Alcalde & Stephanie Flude & Mark Wilkinson & Gareth Johnson & Katriona Edlmann & Clare E. Bond & Vivian Scott & Stuart M. V. Gilfillan & Xènia Ogaya & R. Stuart Haszeldine, 2018. "Estimating geological CO2 storage security to deliver on climate mitigation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Rissman, Jeffrey & Bataille, Chris & Masanet, Eric & Aden, Nate & Morrow, William R. & Zhou, Nan & Elliott, Neal & Dell, Rebecca & Heeren, Niko & Huckestein, Brigitta & Cresko, Joe & Miller, Sabbie A., 2020. "Technologies and policies to decarbonize global industry: Review and assessment of mitigation drivers through 2070," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhao, Guojun & Zheng, Jia-nan & Gong, Guangjun & Chen, Bingbing & Yang, Mingjun & Song, Yongchen, 2023. "Formation characteristics and leakage termination effects of CO2 hydrate cap in case of geological sequestration leakage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    2. Leng Tian & Xiaolong Chai & Lei Zhang & Wenbo Zhang & Yuan Zhu & Jiaxin Wang & Jianguo Wang, 2024. "Study on Compatibility Evaluation of Multilayer Co-Production to Enhance Recovery of Water Flooding in Oil Reservoir," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-13, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oshiro, Ken & Fujimori, Shinichiro, 2022. "Role of hydrogen-based energy carriers as an alternative option to reduce residual emissions associated with mid-century decarbonization goals," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    2. Galán-Martín, Ángel & Contreras, María del Mar & Romero, Inmaculada & Ruiz, Encarnación & Bueno-Rodríguez, Salvador & Eliche-Quesada, Dolores & Castro-Galiano, Eulogio, 2022. "The potential role of olive groves to deliver carbon dioxide removal in a carbon-neutral Europe: Opportunities and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    3. Hanne Lamberts-Van Assche & Tine Compernolle, 2022. "Using Real Options Thinking to Value Investment Flexibility in Carbon Capture and Utilization Projects: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, February.
    4. Natalia Czaplicka & Donata Konopacka-Łyskawa, 2020. "Utilization of Gaseous Carbon Dioxide and Industrial Ca-Rich Waste for Calcium Carbonate Precipitation: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-25, November.
    5. Zhang, Zhien & Pan, Shu-Yuan & Li, Hao & Cai, Jianchao & Olabi, Abdul Ghani & Anthony, Edward John & Manovic, Vasilije, 2020. "Recent advances in carbon dioxide utilization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    6. Ryu, Kyung Hwan & Kim, Boeun & Heo, Seongmin, 2022. "Sustainability analysis framework based on global market dynamics: A carbon capture and utilization industry case," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    7. Xiao, Ting & Chen, Ting & Ma, Zhiwei & Tian, Hailong & Meguerdijian, Saro & Chen, Bailian & Pawar, Rajesh & Huang, Lianjie & Xu, Tianfu & Cather, Martha & McPherson, Brian, 2024. "A review of risk and uncertainty assessment for geologic carbon storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PB).
    8. Jing, Jing & Yang, Yanlin & Tang, Zhonghua, 2021. "Assessing the influence of injection temperature on CO2 storage efficiency and capacity in the sloping formation with fault," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PA).
    9. Bong Jae Lee & Jeong Il Lee & Soo Young Yun & Cheol-Soo Lim & Young-Kwon Park, 2020. "Economic Evaluation of Carbon Capture and Utilization Applying the Technology of Mineral Carbonation at Coal-Fired Power Plant," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-14, July.
    10. Chen, Siyuan & Liu, Jiangfeng & Zhang, Qi & Teng, Fei & McLellan, Benjamin C., 2022. "A critical review on deployment planning and risk analysis of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) toward carbon neutrality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    11. Oghare Victor Ogidiama & Tariq Shamim, 2021. "Assessment of CO2 capture technologies for CO2 utilization in enhanced oil recovery," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(3), pages 432-444, June.
    12. Wang, H.D. & Chen, Y. & Ma, G.W., 2020. "Effects of capillary pressures on two-phase flow of immiscible carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery in fractured media," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    13. Fábio T. F. Silva & Alexandre Szklo & Amanda Vinhoza & Ana Célia Nogueira & André F. P. Lucena & Antônio Marcos Mendonça & Camilla Marcolino & Felipe Nunes & Francielle M. Carvalho & Isabela Tagomori , 2022. "Inter-sectoral prioritization of climate technologies: insights from a Technology Needs Assessment for mitigation in Brazil," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(7), pages 1-39, October.
    14. Qi, Meng & Park, Jinwoo & Lee, Inkyu & Moon, Il, 2022. "Liquid air as an emerging energy vector towards carbon neutrality: A multi-scale systems perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    15. Mayyas Alsalman & Vian Ahmed & Zied Bahroun & Sara Saboor, 2023. "An Economic Analysis of Solar Energy Generation Policies in the UAE," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-25, March.
    16. Guido Busca, 2024. "Critical Aspects of Energetic Transition Technologies and the Roles of Materials Chemistry and Engineering," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-32, July.
    17. Michael Carus & Lara Dammer & Achim Raschka & Pia Skoczinski, 2020. "Renewable carbon: Key to a sustainable and future‐oriented chemical and plastic industry: Definition, strategy, measures and potential," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(3), pages 488-505, June.
    18. Róbert Csalódi & Tímea Czvetkó & Viktor Sebestyén & János Abonyi, 2022. "Sectoral Analysis of Energy Transition Paths and Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-26, October.
    19. Kamal Jawher Khudaida & Diganta Bhusan Das, 2020. "A Numerical Analysis of the Effects of Supercritical CO 2 Injection on CO 2 Storage Capacities of Geological Formations," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-32, September.
    20. Cai, Mingyu & Su, Yuliang & Elsworth, Derek & Li, Lei & Fan, Liyao, 2021. "Hydro-mechanical-chemical modeling of sub-nanopore capillary-confinement on CO2-CCUS-EOR," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:323:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922008935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.