IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v277y2020ics0306261920310229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing View Factor modeling frameworks for the estimation of incident solar energy

Author

Listed:
  • Arias-Rosales, Andrés
  • LeDuc, Philip R.

Abstract

View Factors are instrumental in using widely available horizontal solar radiation data for calculating the incident radiation on harvesting surfaces with arbitrary positions. This capability is notably useful for the design, optimization, and performance forecasting of solar devices. There are several main View Factor models (Liu-Jordan’s, Tian’s, and Badescu’s), which can lead to different theoretical implications and energy estimates. However, the assessments about the validity and underlying assumptions of these models are sometimes contradictory. Resolving this is important for utilizing the most appropriate framework given specific schemes and modeling goals. This work presents a comparative systematic analysis of a wide range of View Factor modeling frameworks with the purpose to gain a deeper understanding of the theoretical consistency and implications of the main View Factor models. The different sets of assumptions are evaluated through stochastic rays simulations and verified against integral models. Five frameworks for the Isotropic and Albedo View Factors were found to be consistent with Liu-Jordan’s model, two with Tian’s, and two with Badescu’s (partially); all with RMSE ⩽0.0014. Considering the most common ways to conceptualize the other components of the radiation, there was consistency with the Perez sky models (RMSE ⩽0.0055) for the View Factor of the Circumsolar radiation as a 25° cone and Horizon Brightening as a flat ring. For the View Factor of the Horizon Brightening as a 6.5° band, two regression models are introduced. By enabling a deeper insight into the sets of assumptions that are consistent with the main View Factor models, this work is valuable for the convergence and best implementation of the various theories in the modeling of incident solar radiation.

Suggested Citation

  • Arias-Rosales, Andrés & LeDuc, Philip R., 2020. "Comparing View Factor modeling frameworks for the estimation of incident solar energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:277:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920310229
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115510
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261920310229
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115510?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Badescu, V., 2002. "3D isotropic approximation for solar diffuse irradiance on tilted surfaces," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 221-233.
    2. Arias-Rosales, Andrés & LeDuc, Philip R., 2020. "Modeling the transmittance of anisotropic diffuse radiation towards estimating energy losses in solar panel coverings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    3. Ramírez-Faz, J. & López-Luque, R. & Casares, F.J., 2015. "Development of synthetic hemispheric projections suitable for assessing the sky view factor on vertical planes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 279-286.
    4. Freitas, S. & Catita, C. & Redweik, P. & Brito, M.C., 2015. "Modelling solar potential in the urban environment: State-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 915-931.
    5. d'Alessandro, Vincenzo & Di Napoli, Fabio & Guerriero, Pierluigi & Daliento, Santolo, 2015. "An automated high-granularity tool for a fast evaluation of the yield of PV plants accounting for shading effects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 294-304.
    6. Yadav, Somil & Panda, S.K. & Hachem-Vermette, Caroline, 2020. "Method to improve performance of building integrated photovoltaic thermal system having optimum tilt and facing directions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    7. Sengupta, Manajit & Xie, Yu & Lopez, Anthony & Habte, Aron & Maclaurin, Galen & Shelby, James, 2018. "The National Solar Radiation Data Base (NSRDB)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 51-60.
    8. Rakovec, Jože & Zakšek, Klemen, 2012. "On the proper analytical expression for the sky-view factor and the diffuse irradiation of a slope for an isotropic sky," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 440-444.
    9. Mohajeri, N. & Gudmundsson, A. & Kunckler, T. & Upadhyay, G. & Assouline, D. & Kämpf, J.H & Scartezzini, J.L., 2019. "A solar-based sustainable urban design: The effects of city-scale street-canyon geometry on solar access in Geneva, Switzerland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 173-190.
    10. Chang, Soowon & Saha, Nirvik & Castro-Lacouture, Daniel & Yang, Perry Pei-Ju, 2019. "Multivariate relationships between campus design parameters and energy performance using reinforcement learning and parametric modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 253-264.
    11. Lingfors, D. & Bright, J.M. & Engerer, N.A. & Ahlberg, J. & Killinger, S. & Widén, J., 2017. "Comparing the capability of low- and high-resolution LiDAR data with application to solar resource assessment, roof type classification and shading analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1216-1230.
    12. Gu, Wenbo & Ma, Tao & Li, Meng & Shen, Lu & Zhang, Yijie, 2020. "A coupled optical-electrical-thermal model of the bifacial photovoltaic module," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    13. Li, Danny H.W. & Cheung, Gary H.W., 2005. "Study of models for predicting the diffuse irradiance on inclined surfaces," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(2), pages 170-186, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Saeed Swaid & Joseph Appelbaum & Avi Aronescu, 2021. "Shading and Masking of PV Collectors on Horizontal and Sloped Planes Facing South and North—A Comparative Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Joseph Appelbaum & Avi Aronescu, 2022. "View Factors of Flat Collectors, Including Photovoltaics, Visible to Partial Sky," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Zainali, Sebastian & Ma Lu, Silvia & Stridh, Bengt & Avelin, Anders & Amaducci, Stefano & Colauzzi, Michele & Campana, Pietro Elia, 2023. "Direct and diffuse shading factors modelling for the most representative agrivoltaic system layouts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 339(C).
    4. Arias-Rosales, Andrés & LeDuc, Philip R., 2023. "Urban solar harvesting: The importance of diffuse shadows in complex environments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    5. Aronescu, A. & Appelbaum, J., 2024. "Sky view factors of curved surfaces," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    6. Arias-Rosales, Andrés & LeDuc, Philip R., 2022. "Shadow modeling in urban environments for solar harvesting devices with freely defined positions and orientations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arias-Rosales, Andrés & LeDuc, Philip R., 2023. "Urban solar harvesting: The importance of diffuse shadows in complex environments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    2. Arias-Rosales, Andrés & LeDuc, Philip R., 2022. "Shadow modeling in urban environments for solar harvesting devices with freely defined positions and orientations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    3. Tian, B. & Loonen, R.C.G.M. & Bognár, Á. & Hensen, J.L.M., 2022. "Impacts of surface model generation approaches on raytracing-based solar potential estimation in urban areas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 804-824.
    4. Quan, Hao & Yang, Dazhi, 2020. "Probabilistic solar irradiance transposition models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    5. Sebastian Krapf & Nils Kemmerzell & Syed Khawaja Haseeb Uddin & Manuel Hack Vázquez & Fabian Netzler & Markus Lienkamp, 2021. "Towards Scalable Economic Photovoltaic Potential Analysis Using Aerial Images and Deep Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Nasrollahi, Nazanin & Shokri, Elham, 2016. "Daylight illuminance in urban environments for visual comfort and energy performance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 861-874.
    7. Lukač, Niko & Špelič, Denis & Štumberger, Gorazd & Žalik, Borut, 2020. "Optimisation for large-scale photovoltaic arrays’ placement based on Light Detection And Ranging data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    8. Zhong, Qing & Nelson, Jake R. & Tong, Daoqin & Grubesic, Tony H., 2022. "A spatial optimization approach to increase the accuracy of rooftop solar energy assessments," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 316(C).
    9. Neupane, Deependra & Kafle, Sagar & Karki, Kaji Ram & Kim, Dae Hyun & Pradhan, Prajal, 2022. "Solar and wind energy potential assessment at provincial level in Nepal: Geospatial and economic analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 278-291.
    10. Mehleri, E.D. & Zervas, P.L. & Sarimveis, H. & Palyvos, J.A. & Markatos, N.C., 2010. "A new neural network model for evaluating the performance of various hourly slope irradiation models: Implementation for the region of Athens," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 1357-1362.
    11. Gueymard, Christian A. & Bright, Jamie M. & Lingfors, David & Habte, Aron & Sengupta, Manajit, 2019. "A posteriori clear-sky identification methods in solar irradiance time series: Review and preliminary validation using sky imagers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 412-427.
    12. Omoyele, Olalekan & Hoffmann, Maximilian & Koivisto, Matti & Larrañeta, Miguel & Weinand, Jann Michael & Linßen, Jochen & Stolten, Detlef, 2024. "Increasing the resolution of solar and wind time series for energy system modeling: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PB).
    13. Vallianos, Charalampos & Candanedo, José & Athienitis, Andreas, 2023. "Application of a large smart thermostat dataset for model calibration and Model Predictive Control implementation in the residential sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    14. Bracken, Cameron & Voisin, Nathalie & Burleyson, Casey D. & Campbell, Allison M. & Hou, Z. Jason & Broman, Daniel, 2024. "Standardized benchmark of historical compound wind and solar energy droughts across the Continental United States," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    15. Zimmerman, Ryan & Panda, Anurag & Bulović, Vladimir, 2020. "Techno-economic assessment and deployment strategies for vertically-mounted photovoltaic panels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    16. Formolli, M. & Kleiven, T. & Lobaccaro, G., 2023. "Assessing solar energy accessibility at high latitudes: A systematic review of urban spatial domains, metrics, and parameters," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    17. Barbón, A. & Fortuny Ayuso, P. & Bayón, L. & Silva, C.A., 2023. "Experimental and numerical investigation of the influence of terrain slope on the performance of single-axis trackers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    18. Sanzana Tabassum & Tanvin Rahman & Ashraf Ul Islam & Sumayya Rahman & Debopriya Roy Dipta & Shidhartho Roy & Naeem Mohammad & Nafiu Nawar & Eklas Hossain, 2021. "Solar Energy in the United States: Development, Challenges and Future Prospects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-65, December.
    19. Finn, Thomas & McKenzie, Paul, 2020. "A high-resolution suitability index for solar farm location in complex landscapes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 520-533.
    20. Younghun Choi & Takuro Kobashi & Yoshiki Yamagata & Akito Murayama, 2021. "Assessment of waterfront office redevelopment plan on optimal building energy demand and rooftop photovoltaics for urban decarbonization," Papers 2108.09029, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:277:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920310229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.