IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i13p3850-d582690.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shading and Masking of PV Collectors on Horizontal and Sloped Planes Facing South and North—A Comparative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Saeed Swaid

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, 69978 Tel Aviv, Israel)

  • Joseph Appelbaum

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, 69978 Tel Aviv, Israel)

  • Avi Aronescu

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, 69978 Tel Aviv, Israel)

Abstract

With the increase in PV system installations, the available free land and rooftops for these systems may become scarcer, and therefore sloped fields facing the north may be utilized for that purpose. In deployments of PV collectors in multiple rows, either on horizontal or sloped planes, the second and subsequent rows are subject to two effects: shading and masking. Both effects reduce the electric energy generated by the PV systems. Multiple rows of collectors are deployed on horizontal planes and on sloped planes facing south, and literature on the topic has been published. No literature deals analytically with deployments of PV fields on north-facing slopes in the northern hemisphere, to the best of our knowledge. The present study develops explicit analytical expressions for the shadow height and length cast on a collector row by a row in front in multiple-row PV systems installed on slopes facing north. In addition, analytical expressions are developed for row spacing and sky view factors, altogether leading consequently to the determination of shading and masking losses. Having the developed expressions, a comparison was made between PV deployments on north-facing sloped planes to PV deployments on horizontal and south-facing slopes regarding shading and masking losses. The main finding is that the percentage of masking losses (diffuse radiation) may exceed the percentage of shading losses (beam radiation) in PV fields. At the local site 32 ∘ N , collector inclination angle β = 25 ∘ and sloped-plane ε = 10 ∘ , for example, the percentage of masking losses for a horizontal plane is 6.90%; for a sloped plane facing south, the losses are 5.39%, and for a sloped plane facing north, the losses are 6.86%. In comparison to the masking losses, the percentage of shading losses for the horizontal plane is 0.83%; for the sloped plane facing south, the losses are 0.42%, and for the sloped plane facing north, the losses are 1.37%.

Suggested Citation

  • Saeed Swaid & Joseph Appelbaum & Avi Aronescu, 2021. "Shading and Masking of PV Collectors on Horizontal and Sloped Planes Facing South and North—A Comparative Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:13:p:3850-:d:582690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/13/3850/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/13/3850/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Copper, J.K. & Sproul, A.B. & Bruce, A.G., 2016. "A method to calculate array spacing and potential system size of photovoltaic arrays in the urban environment using vector analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 11-23.
    2. Francesco Mancini & Benedetto Nastasi, 2020. "Solar Energy Data Analytics: PV Deployment and Land Use," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Scognamiglio, Alessandra, 2016. "‘Photovoltaic landscapes’: Design and assessment. A critical review for a new transdisciplinary design vision," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 629-661.
    4. Appelbaum, J., 2018. "The role of view factors in solar photovoltaic fields," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 161-171.
    5. Arias-Rosales, Andrés & LeDuc, Philip R., 2020. "Comparing View Factor modeling frameworks for the estimation of incident solar energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    6. Avi Aronescu & Joseph Appelbaum, 2019. "The Effect of Collector Shading and Masking on Optimized PV Field Designs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-10, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fernández-Solas, Álvaro & Fernández-Ocaña, Ana M. & Almonacid, Florencia & Fernández, Eduardo F., 2023. "Potential of agrivoltaics systems into olive groves in the Mediterranean region," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 352(C).
    2. Appelbaum, Joseph & Aronescu, Avi, 2022. "Inter-row spacing calculation in photovoltaic fields - A new approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 387-394.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joseph Appelbaum & Avi Aronescu, 2022. "View Factors of Flat Collectors, Including Photovoltaics, Visible to Partial Sky," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Amaducci, Stefano & Yin, Xinyou & Colauzzi, Michele, 2018. "Agrivoltaic systems to optimise land use for electric energy production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 545-561.
    3. Lobaccaro, G. & Croce, S. & Lindkvist, C. & Munari Probst, M.C. & Scognamiglio, A. & Dahlberg, J. & Lundgren, M. & Wall, M., 2019. "A cross-country perspective on solar energy in urban planning: Lessons learned from international case studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 209-237.
    4. Smrutiranjan Nayak & Sanjeeb Kumar Kar & Subhransu Sekhar Dash & Pradeep Vishnuram & Sudhakar Babu Thanikanti & Benedetto Nastasi, 2022. "Enhanced Salp Swarm Algorithm for Multimodal Optimization and Fuzzy Based Grid Frequency Controller Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, April.
    5. Johnson, Joji & Manikandan, S., 2023. "Experimental study and model development of bifacial photovoltaic power plants for Indian climatic zones," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    6. Jouttijärvi, Sami & Lobaccaro, Gabriele & Kamppinen, Aleksi & Miettunen, Kati, 2022. "Benefits of bifacial solar cells combined with low voltage power grids at high latitudes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    7. Teodoro Semeraro & Roberta Aretano & Amilcare Barca & Alessandro Pomes & Cecilia Del Giudice & Elisa Gatto & Marcello Lenucci & Riccardo Buccolieri & Rohinton Emmanuel & Zhi Gao & Alessandra Scognamig, 2020. "A Conceptual Framework to Design Green Infrastructure: Ecosystem Services as an Opportunity for Creating Shared Value in Ground Photovoltaic Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-28, July.
    8. Hu, Jing & Harmsen, Robert & Crijns-Graus, Wina & Worrell, Ernst, 2019. "Geographical optimization of variable renewable energy capacity in China using modern portfolio theory," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Siamak Hoseinzadeh & Daniele Groppi & Adriana Scarlet Sferra & Umberto Di Matteo & Davide Astiaso Garcia, 2022. "The PRISMI Plus Toolkit Application to a Grid-Connected Mediterranean Island," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-14, November.
    10. Ming Lu & Alin Lin & Jiyi Sun, 2018. "The Impact of Photovoltaic Applications on Urban Landscapes Based on Visual Q Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    11. Hayibo, Koami Soulemane & Pearce, Joshua M., 2023. "Vertical free-swinging photovoltaic racking energy modeling: A novel approach to agrivoltaics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    12. Zhang Deng & Yixing Chen & Xiao Pan & Zhiwen Peng & Jingjing Yang, 2021. "Integrating GIS-Based Point of Interest and Community Boundary Datasets for Urban Building Energy Modeling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    13. Hengtian Wang & Xiaolong Yang & Xinxin Xu & Liu Fei, 2021. "Exploring Opportunities and Challenges of Solar PV Power under Carbon Peak Scenario in China: A PEST Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-28, May.
    14. Sofia Agostinelli & Fabrizio Cumo & Meysam Majidi Nezhad & Giuseppe Orsini & Giuseppe Piras, 2022. "Renewable Energy System Controlled by Open-Source Tools and Digital Twin Model: Zero Energy Port Area in Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-24, March.
    15. Willockx, Brecht & Reher, Thomas & Lavaert, Cas & Herteleer, Bert & Van de Poel, Bram & Cappelle, Jan, 2024. "Design and evaluation of an agrivoltaic system for a pear orchard," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 353(PB).
    16. Matteo Giacomo Prina & Giampaolo Manzolini & David Moser & Roberto Vaccaro & Wolfram Sparber, 2020. "Multi-Objective Optimization Model EPLANopt for Energy Transition Analysis and Comparison with Climate-Change Scenarios," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, June.
    17. Sameh Monna & Adel Juaidi & Ramez Abdallah & Mohammed Itma, 2020. "A Comparative Assessment for the Potential Energy Production from PV Installation on Residential Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    18. Katarzyna Kocur-Bera, 2024. "Are Local Commune Governments Interested in the Development of Photovoltaics in Their Area? An Inside View of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-17, April.
    19. Gerardo Alcalá & Luis Fernando Grisales-Noreña & Quetzalcoatl Hernandez-Escobedo & Jose Javier Muñoz-Criollo & J. D. Revuelta-Acosta, 2021. "SHP Assessment for a Run-of-River (RoR) Scheme Using a Rectangular Mesh Sweeping Approach (MSA) Based on GIS," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, May.
    20. Flavio Rosa, 2020. "Building-Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPV) in Historical Buildings: Opportunities and Constraints," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-28, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:13:p:3850-:d:582690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.