IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v261y2020ics0306261919321452.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improved methods for determining effective sandstone reservoirs and evaluating hydrocarbon enrichment in petroliferous basins

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Wenyang
  • Pang, Xiongqi
  • Chen, Zhangxin
  • Chen, Dongxia
  • Ma, Xinhua
  • Zhu, Weiping
  • Zheng, Tianyu
  • Wu, Keliu
  • Zhang, Kun
  • Ma, Kuiyou

Abstract

Geological uncertainty is the greatest risk in oil exploration. Most of the evaluation and risk assessment of exploration projects are characterized by the hydrocarbon enrichment evaluation of the target reservoir to avoid non-effective reservoirs. Based on experiments and detailed analysis of the hydrocarbon accumulation process, we propose a new criterion, namely reservoir hydrocarbon enrichment potential index, expressed as PI, for improved evaluation and assessment. According to the index PI, sandstone reservoirs are classified into four categories: Level IV, PI ≤ 0; Level III, 0 < PI ≤ 0.01; Level II, 0.01 < PI ≤ 0.1; Level I, 0.1 < PI ≤ 1. Level IV reservoirs are non-effective, whereas Level III, Level II, and Level I reservoirs are effective and their hydrocarbon enrichment potentials increase progressively. The recommended strategy is to prioritize the exploration of sandstone reservoirs in the order of Level I > Level II > Level III and avoid Level IV reservoirs. This strategy was applied to the Mesozoic sandstone in western Sichuan Depression, China, to demonstrate the method and workflow. Drilling success rate is positively correlated with the PI of the sandstone reservoir. The results of 153 wells drilled in western Sichuan Depression show the accuracy of the method to be 84.5%. Therefore, this method is useful for quick and effective scientific decisions on oil exploration projects, thus mitigating the risks in oil exploration projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Wenyang & Pang, Xiongqi & Chen, Zhangxin & Chen, Dongxia & Ma, Xinhua & Zhu, Weiping & Zheng, Tianyu & Wu, Keliu & Zhang, Kun & Ma, Kuiyou, 2020. "Improved methods for determining effective sandstone reservoirs and evaluating hydrocarbon enrichment in petroliferous basins," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:261:y:2020:i:c:s0306261919321452
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114457
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261919321452
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114457?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhao, Chunfu & Chen, Bin, 2014. "China’s oil security from the supply chain perspective: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 269-279.
    2. Crow, Daniel J.G. & Giarola, Sara & Hawkes, Adam D., 2018. "A dynamic model of global natural gas supply," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 452-469.
    3. Kiriyama, Eriko & Kajikawa, Yuya, 2014. "A multilayered analysis of energy security research and the energy supply process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 415-423.
    4. Hammond, Geoffrey P. & O’Grady, Áine, 2017. "Indicative energy technology assessment of UK shale gas extraction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P2), pages 1907-1918.
    5. Luo, Dongkun & Zhao, Xu, 2012. "Modeling the operating costs for petroleum exploration and development projects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 189-195.
    6. Cai, Jianchao & Zhang, Zhien & Wei, Wei & Guo, Dongming & Li, Shuai & Zhao, Peiqiang, 2019. "The critical factors for permeability-formation factor relation in reservoir rocks: Pore-throat ratio, tortuosity and connectivity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    7. Athens, Noah D. & Caers, Jef K., 2019. "A Monte Carlo-based framework for assessing the value of information and development risk in geothermal exploration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    8. Aguilera, Roberto F. & Ripple, Ronald D., 2012. "Technological progress and the availability of European oil and gas resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 387-392.
    9. Montgomery, J.B. & O’Sullivan, F.M., 2017. "Spatial variability of tight oil well productivity and the impact of technology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 344-355.
    10. Khalil, Munawar & Jan, Badrul Mohamed & Tong, Chong Wen & Berawi, Mohammed Ali, 2017. "Advanced nanomaterials in oil and gas industry: Design, application and challenges," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 287-310.
    11. Tan, Siah Hong & Barton, Paul I., 2017. "Optimal shale oil and gas investments in the United States," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 398-422.
    12. Rui, Zhenhua & Wang, Xiaoqing & Zhang, Zhien & Lu, Jun & Chen, Gang & Zhou, Xiyu & Patil, Shirish, 2018. "A realistic and integrated model for evaluating oil sands development with Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage technology in Canada," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 76-91.
    13. repec:aen:journl:eeep4_1_krupnick is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Leung, Guy C.K. & Cherp, Aleh & Jewell, Jessica & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2014. "Securitization of energy supply chains in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 316-326.
    15. Ampomah, W. & Balch, R.S. & Cather, M. & Will, R. & Gunda, D. & Dai, Z. & Soltanian, M.R., 2017. "Optimum design of CO2 storage and oil recovery under geological uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 80-92.
    16. Wang, Wenyang & Pang, Xiongqi & Chen, Zhangxin & Chen, Dongxia & Zheng, Tianyu & Luo, Bing & Li, Jing & Yu, Rui, 2019. "Quantitative prediction of oil and gas prospects of the Sinian-Lower Paleozoic in the Sichuan Basin in central China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 861-872.
    17. Yuan, Jiehui & Luo, Dongkun & Feng, Lianyong, 2015. "A review of the technical and economic evaluation techniques for shale gas development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 49-65.
    18. Dong, Xiaohu & Liu, Huiqing & Chen, Zhangxin & Wu, Keliu & Lu, Ning & Zhang, Qichen, 2019. "Enhanced oil recovery techniques for heavy oil and oilsands reservoirs after steam injection," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 1190-1211.
    19. Egging, Ruud & Holz, Franziska, 2016. "Risks in global natural gas markets: Investment, hedging and trade," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 468-479.
    20. Zhongmin Wang and Alan Krupnick, 2015. "A Retrospective Review of Shale Gas Development in the United States: What Led to the Boom?," Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ma, Kuiyou & Pang, Xiongqi & Pang, Hong & Lv, Chuanbing & Gao, Ting & Chen, Junqing & Huo, Xungang & Cong, Qi & Jiang, Mengya, 2022. "A novel method for favorable zone prediction of conventional hydrocarbon accumulations based on RUSBoosted tree machine learning algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    2. Wang, Wenyang & Pang, Xiongqi & Chen, Zhangxin & Chen, Dongxia & Wang, Yaping & Yang, Xuan & Luo, Bing & Zhang, Wang & Zhang, Xinwen & Li, Changrong & Wang, Qifeng & Li, Caijun, 2021. "Quantitative evaluation of transport efficiency of fault-reservoir composite migration pathway systems in carbonate petroliferous basins," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jin, Lu & Hawthorne, Steven & Sorensen, James & Pekot, Lawrence & Kurz, Bethany & Smith, Steven & Heebink, Loreal & Herdegen, Volker & Bosshart, Nicholas & Torres, José & Dalkhaa, Chantsalmaa & Peters, 2017. "Advancing CO2 enhanced oil recovery and storage in unconventional oil play—Experimental studies on Bakken shales," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 171-183.
    2. Wang, Sen & Qin, Chaoxu & Feng, Qihong & Javadpour, Farzam & Rui, Zhenhua, 2021. "A framework for predicting the production performance of unconventional resources using deep learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    3. Zhou, Guangzhao & Guo, Zanquan & Sun, Simin & Jin, Qingsheng, 2023. "A CNN-BiGRU-AM neural network for AI applications in shale oil production prediction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 344(C).
    4. Wang, Hui & Chen, Li & Qu, Zhiguo & Yin, Ying & Kang, Qinjun & Yu, Bo & Tao, Wen-Quan, 2020. "Modeling of multi-scale transport phenomena in shale gas production — A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    5. Devine, Mel & Russo, Marianna, 2018. "LNG and gas storage optimisation and valuation: lessons from the integrated Irish and UK markets," Papers WP606, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    6. Wang, Wenyang & Pang, Xiongqi & Chen, Zhangxin & Chen, Dongxia & Wang, Yaping & Yang, Xuan & Luo, Bing & Zhang, Wang & Zhang, Xinwen & Li, Changrong & Wang, Qifeng & Li, Caijun, 2021. "Quantitative evaluation of transport efficiency of fault-reservoir composite migration pathway systems in carbonate petroliferous basins," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    7. Devine, Mel T. & Russo, Marianna, 2019. "Liquefied natural gas and gas storage valuation: Lessons from the integrated Irish and UK markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1389-1406.
    8. Li, Jing & Wu, Keliu & Chen, Zhangxin & Wang, Wenyang & Yang, Bin & Wang, Kun & Luo, Jia & Yu, Renjie, 2019. "Effects of energetic heterogeneity on gas adsorption and gas storage in geologic shale systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Yao, Yue & Sun, Deqiang & Xu, Jin-Hua & Wang, Bin & Peng, Guohong & Sun, Bingmei, 2023. "Evaluation of enhanced oil recovery methods for mature continental heavy oil fields in China based on geology, technology and sustainability criteria," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PB).
    10. Zhao, Chunfu & Chen, Bin, 2014. "China’s oil security from the supply chain perspective: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 269-279.
    11. Becerra-Fernandez, Mauricio & Cosenz, Federico & Dyner, Isaac, 2020. "Modeling the natural gas supply chain for sustainable growth policy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    12. Dong, Xiaohu & Liu, Huiqing & Chen, Zhangxin & Wu, Keliu & Lu, Ning & Zhang, Qichen, 2019. "Enhanced oil recovery techniques for heavy oil and oilsands reservoirs after steam injection," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 1190-1211.
    13. Pan, Lingying & Liu, Pei & Li, Zheng, 2017. "A system dynamic analysis of China’s oil supply chain: Over-capacity and energy security issues," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 508-520.
    14. Wang, Zhengxu & Gao, Deli & Diao, Binbin & Zhang, Wei, 2020. "The influence of casing properties on performance of radio frequency heating for oil sands recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    15. Jiang, Jieyun & Rui, Zhenhua & Hazlett, Randy & Lu, Jun, 2019. "An integrated technical-economic model for evaluating CO2 enhanced oil recovery development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 190-211.
    16. Lu, Hongfang & Xu, FengYing & Liu, Hongxiao & Wang, Jun & Campbell, Daniel E. & Ren, Hai, 2019. "Emergy-based analysis of the energy security of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 123-135.
    17. Wang, Sijia & Jiang, Lanlan & Cheng, Zucheng & Liu, Yu & Zhao, Jiafei & Song, Yongchen, 2021. "Experimental study on the CO2-decane displacement front behavior in high permeability sand evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    18. Zhang, Lisong & Li, Jing & Sun, Luning & Yang, Feiyue, 2021. "An influence mechanism of shale barrier on heavy oil recovery using SAGD based on theoretical and numerical analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    19. Zhengbin Wu & Hanzhao Chen & Xidong Cai & Qiyang Gou & Liangliang Jiang & Kai Chen & Zhangxin Chen & Shu Jiang, 2023. "Current Status and Future Trends of In Situ Catalytic Upgrading of Extra Heavy Oil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-29, June.
    20. Middleton, Richard S. & Gupta, Rajan & Hyman, Jeffrey D. & Viswanathan, Hari S., 2017. "The shale gas revolution: Barriers, sustainability, and emerging opportunities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 88-95.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:261:y:2020:i:c:s0306261919321452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.