IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v249y2019icp237-244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gas-fired chemical looping combustion with supercritical CO2 cycle

Author

Listed:
  • Khallaghi, Navid
  • Hanak, Dawid P.
  • Manovic, Vasilije

Abstract

Oxy-fuel combustion is currently gathering attention as one of the promising options for capturing CO2 efficiently, when applied to power plants, for subsequent carbon sequestration. However, this option requires a large quantity of high-purity oxygen that is usually produced in an energy-intensive air separation unit (ASU). Chemical looping combustion (CLC) is a technology with the potential of reducing the costs and energy penalties associated with current state-of-the-art cryogenic ASUs. In this work, the techno-economic performance of a natural gas-fired oxy-combustion cycle with cryogenic ASU is compared with that based on CLC. Two natural gas-fired cycles are considered: (i) staged oxy-fuel natural gas combined cycle as a reference; and (ii) gas-fired CLC with supercritical CO2 cycle. The process models were developed in Aspen Plus® in order to evaluate the thermodynamic performance of the proposed system and to benchmark it against the reference cycle. The results show that the net efficiency of the proposed cycle, including CO2 compression, is more than 51%, which is comparable to that of a conventional natural gas combined cycle with CO2 capture and 2.7% points higher than that of the reference cycle. Moreover, the economic evaluation indicates that a reduction in levelised cost of electricity from £38.3/MWh to £36.1/MWh can be achieved by replacement of the ASU-based oxy-fuel system with CLC. Hence, gas-fired CLC with a supercritical CO2 cycle has high potential for commercialisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Khallaghi, Navid & Hanak, Dawid P. & Manovic, Vasilije, 2019. "Gas-fired chemical looping combustion with supercritical CO2 cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 237-244.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:249:y:2019:i:c:p:237-244
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261919307597
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.096?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pham, H.S. & Alpy, N. & Ferrasse, J.H. & Boutin, O. & Quenaut, J. & Tothill, M. & Haubensack, D. & Saez, M., 2015. "Mapping of the thermodynamic performance of the supercritical CO2 cycle and optimisation for a small modular reactor and a sodium-cooled fast reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 412-424.
    2. Hanak, Dawid P. & Manovic, Vasilije, 2016. "Calcium looping with supercritical CO2 cycle for decarbonisation of coal-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 343-353.
    3. Scaccabarozzi, Roberto & Gatti, Manuele & Martelli, Emanuele, 2016. "Thermodynamic analysis and numerical optimization of the NET Power oxy-combustion cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 505-526.
    4. Hamers, H.P. & Romano, M.C. & Spallina, V. & Chiesa, P. & Gallucci, F. & van Sint Annaland, M., 2015. "Energy analysis of two stage packed-bed chemical looping combustion configurations for integrated gasification combined cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 489-502.
    5. Santini, Lorenzo & Accornero, Carlo & Cioncolini, Andrea, 2016. "On the adoption of carbon dioxide thermodynamic cycles for nuclear power conversion: A case study applied to Mochovce 3 Nuclear Power Plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 446-463.
    6. Naqvi, Rehan & Wolf, Jens & Bolland, Olav, 2007. "Part-load analysis of a chemical looping combustion (CLC) combined cycle with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 360-370.
    7. Le Moullec, Yann, 2013. "Conceptual study of a high efficiency coal-fired power plant with CO2 capture using a supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 32-46.
    8. Padilla, Ricardo Vasquez & Soo Too, Yen Chean & Benito, Regano & Stein, Wes, 2015. "Exergetic analysis of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles integrated with solar central receivers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 348-365.
    9. Wang, Xiaohe & Liu, Qibin & Bai, Zhang & Lei, Jing & Jin, Hongguang, 2018. "Thermodynamic investigations of the supercritical CO2 system with solar energy and biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 108-118.
    10. Adnan, Muflih A. & Azis, Muhammad Mufti & Quddus, Mohammad R. & Hossain, Mohammad M., 2018. "Integrated liquid fuel based chemical looping combustion – parametric study for efficient power generation and CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 2398-2406.
    11. Källén, Malin & Rydén, Magnus & Lyngfelt, Anders & Mattisson, Tobias, 2015. "Chemical-looping combustion using combined iron/manganese/silicon oxygen carriers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 330-337.
    12. Gopan, Akshay & Kumfer, Benjamin M. & Phillips, Jeffrey & Thimsen, David & Smith, Richard & Axelbaum, Richard L., 2014. "Process design and performance analysis of a Staged, Pressurized Oxy-Combustion (SPOC) power plant for carbon capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 179-188.
    13. Hanak, Dawid P. & Jenkins, Barrie G. & Kruger, Tim & Manovic, Vasilije, 2017. "High-efficiency negative-carbon emission power generation from integrated solid-oxide fuel cell and calciner," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1189-1201.
    14. Khan, Mohammed N. & Shamim, Tariq, 2016. "Investigation of hydrogen generation in a three reactor chemical looping reforming process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1186-1194.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Du, Yadong & Yu, Zhiyi & Sun, Weihua & Yang, Ce & Wang, Haimei & Zhang, Hanzhi, 2024. "Chemical looping combustion-driven cooling and power cogeneration system with LNG cold energy utilization: Exergoeconomic analysis and three-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    2. Michalski, Sebastian & Hanak, Dawid P. & Manovic, Vasilije, 2020. "Advanced power cycles for coal-fired power plants based on calcium looping combustion: A techno-economic feasibility assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    3. Byun, Manhee & Lim, Dongjun & Lee, Boreum & Kim, Ayeon & Lee, In-Beum & Brigljević, Boris & Lim, Hankwon, 2022. "Economically feasible decarbonization of the Haber-Bosch process through supercritical CO2 Allam cycle integration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    4. Wang, Yuan & Zhu, Lin & He, Yangdong & Yu, Jianting & Zhang, Chaoli & Wang, Zi, 2023. "Comparative exergoeconomic analysis of atmosphere and pressurized CLC power plants coupled with supercritical CO2 cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ma, Yuegeng & Liu, Ming & Yan, Junjie & Liu, Jiping, 2017. "Thermodynamic study of main compression intercooling effects on supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 746-756.
    2. Olumayegun, Olumide & Wang, Meihong & Oko, Eni, 2019. "Thermodynamic performance evaluation of supercritical CO2 closed Brayton cycles for coal-fired power generation with solvent-based CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1074-1088.
    3. Crespi, Francesco & Gavagnin, Giacomo & Sánchez, David & Martínez, Gonzalo S., 2017. "Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 152-183.
    4. Xu, Jinliang & Sun, Enhui & Li, Mingjia & Liu, Huan & Zhu, Bingguo, 2018. "Key issues and solution strategies for supercritical carbon dioxide coal fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 227-246.
    5. Hanak, Dawid P. & Manovic, Vasilije, 2016. "Calcium looping with supercritical CO2 cycle for decarbonisation of coal-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 343-353.
    6. Olumayegun, Olumide & Wang, Meihong & Kelsall, Greg, 2017. "Thermodynamic analysis and preliminary design of closed Brayton cycle using nitrogen as working fluid and coupled to small modular Sodium-cooled fast reactor (SM-SFR)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 436-453.
    7. Faiza Brahimi & Baya Madani & Messaouda Ghemmadi, 2022. "Comparative Thermodynamic Environmental and Economic Analyses of Combined Cycles Using Air and Supercritical CO 2 in the Bottoming Cycles for Power Generation by Gas Turbine Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-21, November.
    8. Liu, Yaping & Wang, Ying & Huang, Diangui, 2019. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle: A state-of-the-art review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    9. Guo, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Design analysis of supercritical carbon dioxide recuperator," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 21-27.
    10. Luo, Kun & Zhao, Chunguang & Wen, Xu & Gao, Zhengwei & Bai, Yun & Xing, Jiangkuan & Fan, Jianren, 2019. "A priori study of an extended flamelet/progress variable model for NO prediction in pulverized coal flames," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 768-780.
    11. Bai, Wengang & Li, Hongzhi & Zhang, Xuwei & Qiao, Yongqiang & Zhang, Chun & Gao, Wei & Yao, Mingyu, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis of CO2–SF6 mixture working fluid supercritical Brayton cycle used for solar power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    12. Michalski, Sebastian & Hanak, Dawid P. & Manovic, Vasilije, 2020. "Advanced power cycles for coal-fired power plants based on calcium looping combustion: A techno-economic feasibility assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    13. Rajabi, Mahsa & Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Haibo, Zhao & Huang, Zhen, 2019. "Chemical looping technology in CHP (combined heat and power) and CCHP (combined cooling heating and power) systems: A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    14. Kim, Min Seok & Ahn, Yoonhan & Kim, Beomjoo & Lee, Jeong Ik, 2016. "Study on the supercritical CO2 power cycles for landfill gas firing gas turbine bottoming cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 893-909.
    15. Cloete, Schalk & Zaabout, Abdelghafour & Romano, Matteo C. & Chiesa, Paolo & Lozza, Giovanni & Gallucci, Fausto & van Sint Annaland, Martin & Amini, Shahriar, 2017. "Optimization of a Gas Switching Combustion process through advanced heat management strategies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P2), pages 1459-1470.
    16. Wang, Kun & He, Ya-Ling & Zhu, Han-Hui, 2017. "Integration between supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles and molten salt solar power towers: A review and a comprehensive comparison of different cycle layouts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 819-836.
    17. Xin, Tuantuan & Xu, Cheng & Yang, Yongping & Kindra, Vladimir & Rogalev, Andrey, 2023. "A new process splitting analytical method for the coal-based Allam cycle: Thermodynamic assessment and process integration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    18. Son, Seongmin & Jeong, Yongju & Cho, Seong Kuk & Lee, Jeong Ik, 2020. "Development of supercritical CO2 turbomachinery off-design model using 1D mean-line method and Deep Neural Network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    19. Yang, D.L. & Tang, G.H. & Fan, Y.H. & Li, X.L. & Wang, S.Q., 2020. "Arrangement and three-dimensional analysis of cooling wall in 1000 MW S–CO2 coal-fired boiler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    20. S. Mohammad S. Mahmoudi & Ata D. Akbari & Marc A. Rosen, 2016. "Thermoeconomic Analysis and Optimization of a New Combined Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Recompression Brayton/Kalina Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:249:y:2019:i:c:p:237-244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.