IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v216y2018icp634-648.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal design of microtube recuperators for an indirect supercritical carbon dioxide recompression closed Brayton cycle

Author

Listed:
  • Jiang, Yuan
  • Liese, Eric
  • Zitney, Stephen E.
  • Bhattacharyya, Debangsu

Abstract

This paper presents a baseline design and optimization approach developed in Aspen Custom Modeler (ACM) for microtube shell-and-tube exchangers (MSTEs) used for high- and low-temperature recuperation in a 10 MWe indirect supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2) recompression closed Brayton cycle (RCBC). The MSTE-type recuperators are designed using one-dimensional models with thermal-hydraulic correlations appropriate for sCO2 and properties models that capture considerable nonlinear changes in CO2 properties near the critical and pseudo-critical points. Using the successive quadratic programming (SQP) algorithm in ACM, optimal recuperator designs are obtained for either custom or industry-standard microtubes considering constraints based on current advanced manufacturing techniques. The three decision variables are the number of tubes, tube pitch-to-diameter ratio, and tube diameter. Five different objective functions based on different key design measures are considered: minimization of total heat transfer area, heat exchanger volume, metal weight, thermal residence time, and maximization of compactness. Sensitivities studies indicate the constraint on the maximum number of tubes per shell does affect the number of parallel heat exchanger trains but not the tube selection, total number of tubes, tube length and other key design measures in the final optimal design when considering industry-standard tubes. In this study, the optimally designed high- and low-temperature recuperators have 47,000 3/32 in. tubes and 63,000 1/16 in. tubes, respectively. In addition, sensitivities to the design temperature approach and maximum allowable pressure drop are studied, since these specifications significantly impact the optimal design of the recuperators as well as the thermal efficiency and the economic performance of the entire sCO2 Brayton cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiang, Yuan & Liese, Eric & Zitney, Stephen E. & Bhattacharyya, Debangsu, 2018. "Optimal design of microtube recuperators for an indirect supercritical carbon dioxide recompression closed Brayton cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 634-648.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:216:y:2018:i:c:p:634-648
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.082
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261918302071
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.082?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guo, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Design analysis of supercritical carbon dioxide recuperator," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 21-27.
    2. Padilla, Ricardo Vasquez & Too, Yen Chean Soo & Benito, Regano & McNaughton, Robbie & Stein, Wes, 2016. "Thermodynamic feasibility of alternative supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles integrated with an ejector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 49-62.
    3. Sarkar, Jahar, 2015. "Review and future trends of supercritical CO2 Rankine cycle for low-grade heat conversion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 434-451.
    4. Wang, Kun & Li, Ming-Jia & Guo, Jia-Qi & Li, Peiwen & Liu, Zhan-Bin, 2018. "A systematic comparison of different S-CO2 Brayton cycle layouts based on multi-objective optimization for applications in solar power tower plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 109-121.
    5. Heo, Jin Young & Kim, Min Seok & Baik, Seungjoon & Bae, Seong Jun & Lee, Jeong Ik, 2017. "Thermodynamic study of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle using an isothermal compressor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1118-1130.
    6. Jiang, Yuan & Bhattacharyya, Debangsu, 2017. "Techno-economic analysis of direct coal-biomass to liquids (CBTL) plants with shale gas utilization and CO2 capture and storage (CCS)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 433-448.
    7. Padilla, Ricardo Vasquez & Soo Too, Yen Chean & Benito, Regano & Stein, Wes, 2015. "Exergetic analysis of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles integrated with solar central receivers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 348-365.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cheng, Kunlin & Qin, Jiang & Sun, Hongchuang & Li, Heng & He, Shuai & Zhang, Silong & Bao, Wen, 2019. "Power optimization and comparison between simple recuperated and recompressing supercritical carbon dioxide Closed-Brayton-Cycle with finite cold source on hypersonic vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1189-1201.
    2. Zhou, Aozheng & Li, Xue-song & Ren, Xiao-dong & Song, Jian & Gu, Chun-wei, 2020. "Thermodynamic and economic analysis of a supercritical carbon dioxide (S–CO2) recompression cycle with the radial-inflow turbine efficiency prediction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    3. Fan, Y.H. & Tang, G.H. & Sheng, Q. & Li, X.L. & Yang, D.L., 2023. "S–CO2 cooling heat transfer mechanism based on pseudo-condensation and turbulent field analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    4. Du, Yadong & Hu, Chenxing & Yang, Ce & Wang, Haimei & Dong, Wuqiang, 2022. "Size optimization of heat exchanger and thermoeconomic assessment for supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle applied in marine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    5. Dora Villada-Castillo & Guillermo Valencia-Ochoa & Jorge Duarte-Forero, 2023. "Thermohydraulic and Economic Evaluation of a New Design for Printed Circuit Heat Exchangers in Supercritical CO 2 Brayton Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-24, February.
    6. Jiang, Yuan & Liese, Eric & Zitney, Stephen E. & Bhattacharyya, Debangsu, 2018. "Design and dynamic modeling of printed circuit heat exchangers for supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton power cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 1019-1032.
    7. Yao, Lichao & Zou, Zhengping, 2020. "A one-dimensional design methodology for supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycles: Integration of cycle conceptual design and components preliminary design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    8. Robey, Ed & Ramesh, Sridharan & Sabau, Adrian S. & Abdoli, Abas & Black, James & Straub, Doug & Yip, Joe, 2022. "Design optimization of an additively manufactured prototype recuperator for supercritical CO2 power cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    9. Renchuan Zheng & Erlei Gong & Jianzhong Li & Qian Yao & Zhaolong Nie, 2024. "Performance Analysis of Wave Rotor Combustor Integration into Baseline Engines: A Comparative Study of Pressure-Gain and Work Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-18, April.
    10. Edwin Espinel Blanco & Guillermo Valencia Ochoa & Jorge Duarte Forero, 2020. "Thermodynamic, Exergy and Environmental Impact Assessment of S-CO 2 Brayton Cycle Coupled with ORC as Bottoming Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, May.
    11. Zhou, Aozheng & Li, Xue-song & Ren, Xiao-dong & Gu, Chun-wei, 2020. "Improvement design and analysis of a supercritical CO2/transcritical CO2 combined cycle for offshore gas turbine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    12. Liu, Guangxu & Huang, Yanping & Wang, Junfeng & Liu, Ruilong, 2020. "A review on the thermal-hydraulic performance and optimization of printed circuit heat exchangers for supercritical CO2 in advanced nuclear power systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Jinliang & Sun, Enhui & Li, Mingjia & Liu, Huan & Zhu, Bingguo, 2018. "Key issues and solution strategies for supercritical carbon dioxide coal fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 227-246.
    2. Crespi, Francesco & Gavagnin, Giacomo & Sánchez, David & Martínez, Gonzalo S., 2017. "Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 152-183.
    3. Ehsan, M. Monjurul & Guan, Zhiqiang & Gurgenci, Hal & Klimenko, Alexander, 2020. "Feasibility of dry cooling in supercritical CO2 power cycle in concentrated solar power application: Review and a case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    4. Jiang, Yuan & Liese, Eric & Zitney, Stephen E. & Bhattacharyya, Debangsu, 2018. "Design and dynamic modeling of printed circuit heat exchangers for supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton power cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 1019-1032.
    5. Reyes-Belmonte, M.A. & Sebastián, A. & Romero, M. & González-Aguilar, J., 2016. "Optimization of a recompression supercritical carbon dioxide cycle for an innovative central receiver solar power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 17-27.
    6. Guo, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Design analysis of supercritical carbon dioxide recuperator," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 21-27.
    7. Ma, Ning & Meng, Fugui & Hong, Wenpeng & Li, Haoran & Niu, Xiaojuan, 2023. "Thermodynamic assessment of the dry-cooling supercritical Brayton cycle in a direct-heated solar power tower plant enabled by CO2-propane mixture," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 649-663.
    8. Bai, Wengang & Li, Hongzhi & Zhang, Xuwei & Qiao, Yongqiang & Zhang, Chun & Gao, Wei & Yao, Mingyu, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis of CO2–SF6 mixture working fluid supercritical Brayton cycle used for solar power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    9. Sun, Lei & Liu, Tianyuan & Wang, Ding & Huang, Chengming & Xie, Yonghui, 2022. "Deep learning method based on graph neural network for performance prediction of supercritical CO2 power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    10. Ma, Yuegeng & Liu, Ming & Yan, Junjie & Liu, Jiping, 2017. "Thermodynamic study of main compression intercooling effects on supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 746-756.
    11. Wang, Kun & He, Ya-Ling & Zhu, Han-Hui, 2017. "Integration between supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles and molten salt solar power towers: A review and a comprehensive comparison of different cycle layouts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 819-836.
    12. Son, Seongmin & Jeong, Yongju & Cho, Seong Kuk & Lee, Jeong Ik, 2020. "Development of supercritical CO2 turbomachinery off-design model using 1D mean-line method and Deep Neural Network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    13. Yang, Jingze & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2020. "Off-design performance of a supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle integrated with a solar power tower system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    14. Yao, Lichao & Zou, Zhengping, 2020. "A one-dimensional design methodology for supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycles: Integration of cycle conceptual design and components preliminary design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    15. Santini, Lorenzo & Accornero, Carlo & Cioncolini, Andrea, 2016. "On the adoption of carbon dioxide thermodynamic cycles for nuclear power conversion: A case study applied to Mochovce 3 Nuclear Power Plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 446-463.
    16. Xu, Zhen & Liu, Xinxin & Xie, Yingchun, 2023. "Off-design performances of a dry-cooled supercritical recompression Brayton cycle using CO2–H2S as working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    17. Fallah, M. & Mohammadi, Z. & Mahmoudi, S.M. Seyed, 2022. "Advanced exergy analysis of the combined S–CO2/ORC system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    18. Sleiti, Ahmad K. & Al-Ammari, Wahib & Ahmed, Samer & Kapat, Jayanta, 2021. "Direct-fired oxy-combustion supercritical-CO2 power cycle with novel preheating configurations -thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    19. Olumayegun, Olumide & Wang, Meihong & Kelsall, Greg, 2017. "Thermodynamic analysis and preliminary design of closed Brayton cycle using nitrogen as working fluid and coupled to small modular Sodium-cooled fast reactor (SM-SFR)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 436-453.
    20. Wang, Xurong & Dai, Yiping, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis of utilizing the transcritical CO2 cycle and the ORC for a recompression supercritical CO2 cycle waste heat recovery: A comparative study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 193-207.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:216:y:2018:i:c:p:634-648. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.