IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v175y2016icp269-276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of process configurations for combination of rotating packed bed and packed bed on CO2 capture

Author

Listed:
  • Yu, Cheng-Hsiu
  • Chen, Ming-Tsz
  • Chen, Hao
  • Tan, Chung-Sung

Abstract

The effects of different process configurations, including the operation of a single rotating packed bed (RPB), a single packed bed (PB), and RPB+RPB, RPB+PB, and PB+RPB in series or in parallel, on the CO2 rich loading, amount of treated gas, amount of captured CO2 and regeneration energy using “11m” monoethanolamine (MEA) as the model absorbent were studied. When the same volume of absorber was used to achieve the same CO2 capture efficiency, an RPB was identified to be superior to a PB, and RPB+RPB in series showed the greatest performance on the amount of treated gas and regeneration energy among the discussed configurations. Compared with the operation of a single RPB, the amount of treated gas of RPB+RPB in series with the same volume of the single RPB increased by 20.6% due to an increase of mass transfer driving force, whereas the regeneration energy decreased by 9.5% due to an increase of rich loading. Although the CO2 capture efficiency decreased with increasing gas flow rate, the total amount of captured CO2 was found to increase. The treated gas amount could further be increased 80–140% compared with “11m” MEA when the “4m” diethylenetriamine (DETA)+“4m” piperazine (PZ) was used, suggesting this was a superior absorbent for CO2 capture, and thus, the development of absorbent is as important as the development of process.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu, Cheng-Hsiu & Chen, Ming-Tsz & Chen, Hao & Tan, Chung-Sung, 2016. "Effects of process configurations for combination of rotating packed bed and packed bed on CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 269-276.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:175:y:2016:i:c:p:269-276
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261916306389
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Esmaili, Ehsan & Mostafavi, Ehsan & Mahinpey, Nader, 2016. "Economic assessment of integrated coal gasification combined cycle with sorbent CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 341-352.
    2. Ashleigh Cousins & Paul Nielsen & Sanger Huang & Aaron Cottrell & Eric Chen & Gary T Rochelle & Paul H M Feron, 2015. "Pilot‐scale evaluation of concentrated piperazine for CO 2 capture at an Australian coal‐fired power station: duration experiments," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 5(4), pages 363-373, August.
    3. Pan, Shu-Yuan & Lorente Lafuente, Ana Maria & Chiang, Pen-Chi, 2016. "Engineering, environmental and economic performance evaluation of high-gravity carbonation process for carbon capture and utilization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 269-277.
    4. Sharifzadeh, Mahdi & Bumb, Prateek & Shah, Nilay, 2016. "Carbon capture from pulverized coal power plant (PCPP): Solvent performance comparison at an industrial scale," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 423-435.
    5. Hetland, Jens & Kvamsdal, Hanne Marie & Haugen, Geir & Major, Fredrik & Kårstad, Vemund & Tjellander, Göran, 2009. "Integrating a full carbon capture scheme onto a 450Â MWe NGCC electric power generation hub for offshore operations: Presenting the Sevan GTW concept," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(11), pages 2298-2307, November.
    6. Manzolini, G. & Sanchez Fernandez, E. & Rezvani, S. & Macchi, E. & Goetheer, E.L.V. & Vlugt, T.J.H., 2015. "Economic assessment of novel amine based CO2 capture technologies integrated in power plants based on European Benchmarking Task Force methodology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 546-558.
    7. Wang, Meihong & Joel, Atuman S. & Ramshaw, Colin & Eimer, Dag & Musa, Nuhu M., 2015. "Process intensification for post-combustion CO2 capture with chemical absorption: A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 275-291.
    8. Zhao, Bingtao & Su, Yaxin & Tao, Wenwen, 2014. "Mass transfer performance of CO2 capture in rotating packed bed: Dimensionless modeling and intelligent prediction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 132-142.
    9. Ridha, Firas N. & Manovic, Vasilije & Macchi, Arturo & Anthony, Edward J., 2015. "CO2 capture at ambient temperature in a fixed bed with CaO-based sorbents," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 297-303.
    10. Goto, Kazuya & Yogo, Katsunori & Higashii, Takayuki, 2013. "A review of efficiency penalty in a coal-fired power plant with post-combustion CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 710-720.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yoro, Kelvin O. & Daramola, Michael O. & Sekoai, Patrick T. & Armah, Edward K. & Wilson, Uwemedimo N., 2021. "Advances and emerging techniques for energy recovery during absorptive CO2 capture: A review of process and non-process integration-based strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    2. Farhad Ghadyanlou & Ahmad Azari & Ali Vatani, 2021. "A Review of Modeling Rotating Packed Beds and Improving Their Parameters: Gas–Liquid Contact," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-42, July.
    3. Farhad Ghadyanlou & Ahmad Azari & Ali Vatani, 2022. "Experimental Investigation of Mass Transfer Intensification for CO 2 Capture by Environment-Friendly Water Based Nanofluid Solvents in a Rotating Packed Bed," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, May.
    4. Maria Elena Diego & Muhammad Akram & Jean‐Michel Bellas & Karen N. Finney & Mohamed Pourkashanian, 2017. "Making gas‐CCS a commercial reality: The challenges of scaling up," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(5), pages 778-801, October.
    5. Jiao, Weizhou & Luo, Shuai & He, Zhen & Liu, Youzhi, 2017. "Emulsified behaviors for the formation of Methanol-Diesel oil under high gravity environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 2387-2396.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, S.J. & Zhu, M. & Fu, Y. & Huang, Y.X. & Tao, Z.C. & Li, W.L., 2017. "Using 13X, LiX, and LiPdAgX zeolites for CO2 capture from post-combustion flue gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 87-98.
    2. Ali Saleh Bairq, Zain & Gao, Hongxia & Huang, Yufei & Zhang, Haiyan & Liang, Zhiwu, 2019. "Enhancing CO2 desorption performance in rich MEA solution by addition of SO42−/ZrO2/SiO2 bifunctional catalyst," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Qi, Guojie & Liu, Kun & House, Alan & Salmon, Sonja & Ambedkar, Balraj & Frimpong, Reynolds A. & Remias, Joseph E. & Liu, Kunlei, 2018. "Laboratory to bench-scale evaluation of an integrated CO2 capture system using a thermostable carbonic anhydrase promoted K2CO3 solvent with low temperature vacuum stripping," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 180-189.
    4. Hanak, Dawid P. & Biliyok, Chechet & Manovic, Vasilije, 2015. "Efficiency improvements for the coal-fired power plant retrofit with CO2 capture plant using chilled ammonia process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 258-272.
    5. Joel, Atuman S. & Wang, Meihong & Ramshaw, Colin & Oko, Eni, 2017. "Modelling, simulation and analysis of intensified regenerator for solvent based carbon capture using rotating packed bed technology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 11-25.
    6. Sharifzadeh, Mahdi & Bumb, Prateek & Shah, Nilay, 2016. "Carbon capture from pulverized coal power plant (PCPP): Solvent performance comparison at an industrial scale," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 423-435.
    7. Muhammad Asif & Muhammad Suleman & Ihtishamul Haq & Syed Asad Jamal, 2018. "Post‐combustion CO2 capture with chemical absorption and hybrid system: current status and challenges," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 8(6), pages 998-1031, December.
    8. Zhang, Xiaowen & Zhang, Xin & Liu, Helei & Li, Wensheng & Xiao, Min & Gao, Hongxia & Liang, Zhiwu, 2017. "Reduction of energy requirement of CO2 desorption from a rich CO2-loaded MEA solution by using solid acid catalysts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 673-684.
    9. Leimbrink, Mathias & Sandkämper, Stephanie & Wardhaugh, Leigh & Maher, Dan & Green, Phil & Puxty, Graeme & Conway, Will & Bennett, Robert & Botma, Henk & Feron, Paul & Górak, Andrzej & Skiborowski, Mi, 2017. "Energy-efficient solvent regeneration in enzymatic reactive absorption for carbon dioxide capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 263-276.
    10. Zhang, Weidong & Jin, Xianhang & Tu, Weiwei & Ma, Qian & Mao, Menglin & Cui, Chunhua, 2017. "Development of MEA-based CO2 phase change absorbent," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 316-323.
    11. Pettinau, Alberto & Ferrara, Francesca & Tola, Vittorio & Cau, Giorgio, 2017. "Techno-economic comparison between different technologies for CO2-free power generation from coal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 426-439.
    12. Ji, Long & Yu, Hai & Li, Kangkang & Yu, Bing & Grigore, Mihaela & Yang, Qi & Wang, Xiaolong & Chen, Zuliang & Zeng, Ming & Zhao, Shuaifei, 2018. "Integrated absorption-mineralisation for low-energy CO2 capture and sequestration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 356-366.
    13. Peter Viebahn & Emile J. L. Chappin, 2018. "Scrutinising the Gap between the Expected and Actual Deployment of Carbon Capture and Storage—A Bibliometric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-45, September.
    14. Pereira, Luís M.C. & Vega, Lourdes F., 2018. "A systematic approach for the thermodynamic modelling of CO2-amine absorption process using molecular-based models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 273-291.
    15. Bartela, Łukasz & Skorek-Osikowska, Anna & Kotowicz, Janusz, 2015. "An analysis of the investment risk related to the integration of a supercritical coal-fired combined heat and power plant with an absorption installation for CO2 separation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 423-435.
    16. Zhao, Bin & Liu, Fangzheng & Cui, Zheng & Liu, Changjun & Yue, Hairong & Tang, Siyang & Liu, Yingying & Lu, Houfang & Liang, Bin, 2017. "Enhancing the energetic efficiency of MDEA/PZ-based CO2 capture technology for a 650MW power plant: Process improvement," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 362-375.
    17. Zheng, Yawen & Gao, Lin & He, Song, 2023. "Analysis of the mechanism of energy consumption for CO2 capture in a power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    18. Lichun Li & Xiangcan Chen & Zhengfei Chen & Ruiqin Gao & Hangdi Yu & Tian Yuan & Zongjian Liu & Marcel Maeder, 2021. "Heterogeneous catalysts for the hydrogenation of amine/alkali hydroxide solvent captured CO2 to formate: A review," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(4), pages 807-823, August.
    19. Sreedhar, I. & Vaidhiswaran, R. & Kamani, Bansi. M. & Venugopal, A., 2017. "Process and engineering trends in membrane based carbon capture," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 659-684.
    20. Roussanaly, S. & Aasen, A. & Anantharaman, R. & Danielsen, B. & Jakobsen, J. & Heme-De-Lacotte, L. & Neji, G. & Sødal, A. & Wahl, P.E. & Vrana, T.K. & Dreux, R., 2019. "Offshore power generation with carbon capture and storage to decarbonise mainland electricity and offshore oil and gas installations: A techno-economic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 478-494.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:175:y:2016:i:c:p:269-276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.