IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v113y2014icp639-647.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno-economic analysis of the coal-to-olefins process in comparison with the oil-to-olefins process

Author

Listed:
  • Xiang, Dong
  • Qian, Yu
  • Man, Yi
  • Yang, Siyu

Abstract

Olefins are one of the most important oil derivatives widely used in industry. To reduce the dependence of olefins industry on oil, China is increasing the production of olefins from alternative energy resources, especially from coal. This study is concerned with the opportunities and obstacles of coal-to-olefins development, and focuses on making an overall techno-economic analysis of a coal-to-olefins plant with the capacity of 0.7Mt/a olefins. Comparison is made with a 1.5Mt/a oil-to-olefins plant based on three criteria including energy efficiency, capital investment, and product cost. It was found that the coal-based olefins process show prominent advantage in product cost because of the low price of its feedstock. However, it suffers from the limitations of higher capital investment, lower energy efficiency, and higher emissions. The effects of production scale, raw material price, and carbon tax were varied for the two production routes, and thus the operational regions were found for the coal-to-olefins process to be competitive.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiang, Dong & Qian, Yu & Man, Yi & Yang, Siyu, 2014. "Techno-economic analysis of the coal-to-olefins process in comparison with the oil-to-olefins process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 639-647.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:113:y:2014:i:c:p:639-647
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.08.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030626191300648X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.08.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qian, Yu & Liu, Jingyao & Huang, Zhixian & Kraslawski, Andrzej & Cui, Jian & Huang, Yinlun, 2009. "Conceptual design and system analysis of a poly-generation system for power and olefin production from natural gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(10), pages 2088-2095, October.
    2. Liu, Guang-jian & Li, Zheng & Wang, Ming-hua & Ni, Wei-dou, 2010. "Energy savings by co-production: A methanol/electricity case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(9), pages 2854-2859, September.
    3. Ren, Tao & Patel, Martin K. & Blok, Kornelis, 2008. "Steam cracking and methane to olefins: Energy use, CO2 emissions and production costs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 817-833.
    4. Haro, Pedro & Trippe, Frederik & Stahl, Ralph & Henrich, Edmund, 2013. "Bio-syngas to gasoline and olefins via DME – A comprehensive techno-economic assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 54-65.
    5. Mantripragada, Hari Chandan & Rubin, Edward S., 2011. "Techno-economic evaluation of coal-to-liquids (CTL) plants with carbon capture and sequestration," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2808-2816, May.
    6. Yang, Chi-Jen & Jackson, Robert B., 2012. "China's growing methanol economy and its implications for energy and the environment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 878-884.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guo, Zhihang & Wang, Qinhui & Fang, Mengxiang & Luo, Zhongyang & Cen, Kefa, 2014. "Thermodynamic and economic analysis of polygeneration system integrating atmospheric pressure coal pyrolysis technology with circulating fluidized bed power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1301-1314.
    2. Man, Yi & Yang, Siyu & Zhang, Jun & Qian, Yu, 2014. "Conceptual design of coke-oven gas assisted coal to olefins process for high energy efficiency and low CO2 emission," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 197-205.
    3. Xiang, Dong & Xiang, Junjie & Sun, Zhe & Cao, Yan, 2017. "The integrated coke-oven gas and pulverized coke gasification for methanol production with highly efficient hydrogen utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 78-91.
    4. Su, Li-Wang & Li, Xiang-Rong & Sun, Zuo-Yu, 2013. "The consumption, production and transportation of methanol in China: A review," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 130-138.
    5. Yang, Siyu & Yang, Qingchun & Qian, Yu, 2013. "A composite efficiency metrics for evaluation of resource and energy utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 455-462.
    6. Yaser Khojasteh Salkuyeh & Thomas A. Adams II, 2015. "Co-Production of Olefins, Fuels, and Electricity from Conventional Pipeline Gas and Shale Gas with Near-Zero CO 2 Emissions. Part I: Process Development and Technical Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-23, April.
    7. Zhaoyang Kong & Xiucheng Dong & Bo Xu & Rui Li & Qiang Yin & Cuifang Song, 2015. "EROI Analysis for Direct Coal Liquefaction without and with CCS: The Case of the Shenhua DCL Project in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-22, January.
    8. Chen, Xiangxiang & Sun, Zhuang & Kuo, Po-Chih & Aziz, Muhammad, 2024. "Carbon-negative olefins production from biomass and solar energy via direct chemical looping," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    9. Gomes, Gabriel Lourenço & Szklo, Alexandre & Schaeffer, Roberto, 2009. "The impact of CO2 taxation on the configuration of new refineries: An application to Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 5519-5529, December.
    10. Yang, Chi-Jen & Zhou, Yipei & Jackson, Robert B., 2014. "China's fuel gas sector: History, current status, and future prospects," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 12-21.
    11. Uddin, Md Mosleh & Simson, Amanda & Wright, Mark Mba, 2020. "Techno-economic and greenhouse gas emission analysis of dimethyl ether production via the bi-reforming pathway for transportation fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    12. Jiang, Jianrong & Feng, Xiao, 2019. "Energy optimization of ammonia synthesis processes based on oxygen purity under different purification technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 819-828.
    13. Su, Li-Wang & Li, Xiang-Rong & Sun, Zuo-Yu, 2013. "Flow chart of methanol in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 541-550.
    14. Li, Chengjiang & Negnevitsky, Michael & Wang, Xiaolin & Yue, Wen Long & Zou, Xin, 2019. "Multi-criteria analysis of policies for implementing clean energy vehicles in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 826-840.
    15. Qin, Shiyue & Chang, Shiyan & Yao, Qiang, 2018. "Modeling, thermodynamic and techno-economic analysis of coal-to-liquids process with different entrained flow coal gasifiers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 413-432.
    16. Nuthan Prasad, B.S. & Pandey, Jayashish Kumar & Kumar, G.N., 2020. "Impact of changing compression ratio on engine characteristics of an SI engine fueled with equi-volume blend of methanol and gasoline," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    17. Xu, Zhongming & Fang, Chenhao & Ma, Tieju, 2020. "Analysis of China’s olefin industry using a system optimization model considering technological learning and energy consumption reduction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    18. Wolfersdorf, Christian & Boblenz, Kristin & Pardemann, Robert & Meyer, Bernd, 2015. "Syngas-based annex concepts for chemical energy storage and improving flexibility of pulverized coal combustion power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 618-627.
    19. Mohajerani, Sara & Kumar, Amit & Oni, Abayomi Olufemi, 2018. "A techno-economic assessment of gas-to-liquid and coal-to-liquid plants through the development of scale factors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 681-693.
    20. Höök, Mikael & Fantazzini, Dean & Angelantoni, André & Snowden, Simon, 2013. "Hydrocarbon liquefaction: viability as a peak oil mitigation strategy," MPRA Paper 46957, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:113:y:2014:i:c:p:639-647. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.