IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v295y2024ics0378377424000696.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combining the FAO-56 method and the complementary principle to partition the evapotranspiration of typical plantations and grasslands in the Chinese Loess Plateau

Author

Listed:
  • Fu, Chong
  • Song, Xiaoyu
  • Li, Lanjun
  • Zhao, Xinkai
  • Meng, Pengfei
  • Wang, Long
  • Wei, Wanyin
  • Guo, Songle
  • Zhu, Deming
  • He, Xi
  • Yang, Dongdan
  • Li, Huaiyou

Abstract

Quantifying the evapotranspiration (ET) water consumption characteristics of typical vegetation [Robinia pseudoacacia (single vegetation), mixed plantations of Robinia pseudoacacia and Platycladus orientalis (double-mixed vegetation), and natural grassland (multiple-mixed vegetation)] in the Chinese Loess Plateau has both theoretical and practical significance. However, the proportionality and inverse hypotheses of ET, namely, the FAO-56 method and generalized complementary relationship (GCR), have limitations when used individually to estimate ET, evaporation (E), and transpiration (T). This study explores the feasibility of scaling water stress coefficient (Ks) using calibration-free or parameterized GCR for different vegetation types and quantities. The single crop coefficient (Kc) curves and basal crop coefficient adjustment (Kcb-a/Kcb-p) curves of typical vegetation were defined and validated to partition ET without soil moisture usage. The results revealed that both curves exhibited polynomial functional response relationships to the week ordinal (WO) of the growing season within a complete hydrological cycle (with 0.60 < R2 < 0.78 at the 0.01 significance level). By expressing the soil evaporation coefficient (Ke) as a function of Ks, Kc, and Kcb, the calibration-free combined method (combining the GCR and the FAO-56 method – GCR/FAO-56) demonstrated superior simulation performance for E, T, and ET across different vegetation types with an average Nash–Sutcliff Efficiency of 0.71 during the validation period compared to that of the parameterized method, with the highest sensitivity in E simulation. The simulated E, T, and ET values closely matched the actual values and maintained the order of Robinia pseudoacacia > mixed plantation > natural grassland during the growing season. The average biases for E, T, and ET during the validation period were 18.5, 7.0, and 25.5 mm, respectively, in Robinia pseudoacacia; 10.8, 11.1, and 19.7 mm in mixed plantation; and 2.7, 7.0, and 19.6 mm in natural grassland. The overall T/ET ratios for both plantations exceeded 51.07%, with mixed plantation being higher, surpassing 70% in dry years and exhibiting minimal variation in T (44.4 mm) across hydrological years. However, T/ET ratios in natural grassland were < 0.5, indicating that E was the primary form of water consumption. Average relative biases of the simulated and actual T/ET values were only 1.76%, 2.53%, and 1.87% for Robinia pseudoacacia, mixed plantation, and natural grassland, respectively. Furthermore, the accuracy of the calibration-free combined method increased with the number of vegetation species during the validation period. This study extended and discussed the feasibility in typical vegetation of combining the positive and negative correlation principles of evapotranspiration and further provided a possibility for how to partition ET with a fewer dataset [Rn, u, Tavg, RH or Td, P, LAI] without soil moisture, and also provided scientific suggestions for future vegetation restoration as well as water resources management.

Suggested Citation

  • Fu, Chong & Song, Xiaoyu & Li, Lanjun & Zhao, Xinkai & Meng, Pengfei & Wang, Long & Wei, Wanyin & Guo, Songle & Zhu, Deming & He, Xi & Yang, Dongdan & Li, Huaiyou, 2024. "Combining the FAO-56 method and the complementary principle to partition the evapotranspiration of typical plantations and grasslands in the Chinese Loess Plateau," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:295:y:2024:i:c:s0378377424000696
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424000696
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108734?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andini, Nastiti & Kim, Daeha & Chun, Jong Ahn, 2020. "Operational soil moisture modeling using a multi-stage approach based on the generalized complementary principle," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    2. Granata, Francesco, 2019. "Evapotranspiration evaluation models based on machine learning algorithms—A comparative study," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 303-315.
    3. Amani, Shima & Shafizadeh-Moghadam, Hossein, 2023. "A review of machine learning models and influential factors for estimating evapotranspiration using remote sensing and ground-based data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    4. Lyu, Jinlin & He, Qiu-Yue & Chen, Qiu-Wen & Cheng, Ran-Ran & Li, Guoqing & Otsuki, Kyoichi & Yamanaka, Norikazu & Du, Sheng, 2022. "Distinct transpiration characteristics of black locust plantations acclimated to semiarid and subhumid sites in the Loess Plateau, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    5. Xiaoming Feng & Bojie Fu & Shilong Piao & Shuai Wang & Philippe Ciais & Zhenzhong Zeng & Yihe Lü & Yuan Zeng & Yue Li & Xiaohui Jiang & Bingfang Wu, 2016. "Revegetation in China’s Loess Plateau is approaching sustainable water resource limits," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(11), pages 1019-1022, November.
    6. Ramos, Tiago B. & Darouich, Hanaa & Oliveira, Ana R. & Farzamian, Mohammad & Monteiro, Tomás & Castanheira, Nádia & Paz, Ana & Gonçalves, Maria C. & Pereira, Luís S., 2023. "Water use and soil water balance of Mediterranean tree crops assessed with the SIMDualKc model in orchards of southern Portugal," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    7. W. Brutsaert & M. B. Parlange, 1998. "Hydrologic cycle explains the evaporation paradox," Nature, Nature, vol. 396(6706), pages 30-30, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fu, Chong & Song, Xiaoyu & Li, Lanjun & Zhao, Xinkai & Meng, Pengfei & Wang, Long & Wei, Wanyin & Yang, Nan & Li, Huaiyou, 2023. "Combining the Generalized Complementary Relationship and the Modified Priestley-Taylor Equation to estimate and partition the evapotranspiration of typical plantations and grasslands in the Loess Plat," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    2. Zhu, Wenbin & Yu, Xiaoyu & Wei, Jiaxing & Lv, Aifeng, 2024. "Surface flux equilibrium estimates of evaporative fraction and evapotranspiration at global scale: Accuracy evaluation and performance comparison," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    3. Monika Punia & Suman Nain & Amit Kumar & Bhupendra Singh & Amit Prakash & Krishan Kumar & V. Jain, 2015. "Analysis of temperature variability over north-west part of India for the period 1970–2000," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 75(1), pages 935-952, January.
    4. Fuentes, Sigfredo & Ortega-Farías, Samuel & Carrasco-Benavides, Marcos & Tongson, Eden & Gonzalez Viejo, Claudia, 2024. "Actual evapotranspiration and energy balance estimation from vineyards using micro-meteorological data and machine learning modeling," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    5. Ali Barzkar & Mohammad Najafzadeh & Farshad Homaei, 2022. "Evaluation of drought events in various climatic conditions using data-driven models and a reliability-based probabilistic model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 110(3), pages 1931-1952, February.
    6. Ma, Shuai & Wang, Liang-Jie & Chu, Lei & Jiang, Jiang, 2023. "Determination of ecological restoration patterns based on water security and food security in arid regions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    7. Fabio Di Nunno & Marco De Matteo & Giovanni Izzo & Francesco Granata, 2023. "A Combined Clustering and Trends Analysis Approach for Characterizing Reference Evapotranspiration in Veneto," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.
    8. Beáta Novotná & Ľuboš Jurík & Ján Čimo & Jozef Palkovič & Branislav Chvíla & Vladimír Kišš, 2022. "Machine Learning for Pan Evaporation Modeling in Different Agroclimatic Zones of the Slovak Republic (Macro-Regions)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Zhang, Yixiao & He, Tao & Liang, Shunlin & Zhao, Zhongguo, 2023. "A framework for estimating actual evapotranspiration through spatial heterogeneity-based machine learning approaches," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    10. Na Li & Tangzhe Nie & Yi Tang & Dehao Lu & Tianyi Wang & Zhongxue Zhang & Peng Chen & Tiecheng Li & Linghui Meng & Yang Jiao & Kaiwen Cheng, 2022. "Responses of Soybean Water Supply and Requirement to Future Climate Conditions in Heilongjiang Province," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, July.
    11. Zhuangzhi Sun & Chuanlong Han & Shouwei Gao & Zhaoxin Li & Mingxing Jing & Haipeng Yu & Zuankai Wang, 2022. "Achieving efficient power generation by designing bioinspired and multi-layered interfacial evaporator," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    12. Vera, Ivan & Wicke, Birka & Lamers, Patrick & Cowie, Annette & Repo, Anna & Heukels, Bas & Zumpf, Colleen & Styles, David & Parish, Esther & Cherubini, Francesco & Berndes, Göran & Jager, Henriette & , 2022. "Land use for bioenergy: Synergies and trade-offs between sustainable development goals," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    13. Granata, Francesco & Di Nunno, Fabio, 2021. "Forecasting evapotranspiration in different climates using ensembles of recurrent neural networks," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    14. Zhang, Lei & Traore, Seydou & Cui, Yuanlai & Luo, Yufeng & Zhu, Ge & Liu, Bo & Fipps, Guy & Karthikeyan, R. & Singh, Vijay, 2019. "Assessment of spatiotemporal variability of reference evapotranspiration and controlling climate factors over decades in China using geospatial techniques," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 499-511.
    15. Ying Pan & Ke Shi & Zhongxu Zhao & Yao Li & Junxi Wu, 2024. "The effects of China’s poverty eradication program on sustainability and inequality," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    16. Liang-Jie Wang & Shuai Ma & Yong-Peng Qiao & Jin-Chi Zhang, 2020. "Simulating the Impact of Future Climate Change and Ecological Restoration on Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Two Ecological Shelters and Three Belts in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-26, October.
    17. Sergio M. Vicente‐Serrano & Tim R. McVicar & Diego G. Miralles & Yuting Yang & Miquel Tomas‐Burguera, 2020. "Unraveling the influence of atmospheric evaporative demand on drought and its response to climate change," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(2), March.
    18. Li, Sijia & Wang, Jinman & Zhang, Min & Tang, Qian, 2021. "Characterizing and attributing the vegetation coverage changes in North Shanxi coal base of China from 1987 to 2020," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    19. Mohammad Taghi Sattari & Halit Apaydin & Shahaboddin Shamshirband, 2020. "Performance Evaluation of Deep Learning-Based Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs) and Tree-Based Models for Estimating ETo by Using Limited Meteorological Variables," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-18, June.
    20. So Young Woo & Chung Gil Jung & Ji Wan Lee & Seong Joon Kim, 2019. "Evaluation of Watershed Scale Aquatic Ecosystem Health by SWAT Modeling and Random Forest Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:295:y:2024:i:c:s0378377424000696. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.