IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v243y2021ics0378377420313275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The physiological response of winter wheat under short-term drought conditions and the sensitivity of different indices to soil water changes

Author

Listed:
  • Mu, Qing
  • Cai, Huanjie
  • Sun, Shikun
  • Wen, Shanshan
  • Xu, Jiatun
  • Dong, Mengqi
  • Saddique, Qaisar

Abstract

Studying the physiological responses of winter wheat to drought is conducive to learning to utilize biological water-saving technologies, such as regulating deficit irrigation and obtaining higher water use efficiency (WUE). However, the close relationship between the trend of responses of physiological functions in wheat and changes in soil moisture merits further study. In this study, a two-season pot experiment with three levels of water deficit (45 %–75 % FC, field capacity) was established at three growth stages, based on the theory that the drought-resistant physiological functions of winter wheat could respond to regulated deficit irrigation. The goal was to explore the effects of short-term drought-re-watering on yield and WUE and the sensitivity of wheat leaf physiological indicators to reflect changes in soil moisture. The results showed that the short-term drought in different periods after the jointing period reduced the yield of winter wheat by 2.03 %–64.39 % compared with the treatment of an adequate supply of water (75 %–85 % FC). Priority should be placed on ensuring irrigation during the jointing and filling periods. Treatments that experienced drought during the heading period (55 %–75 % FC) and then recovered to 75 %–85 % FC after flowering can improve the WUE by 5 %–22 %. The physiological function of drought resistance in winter wheat leaves responds noticeably to drought and the re-watering process in the range of 45 %–85 % FC. The maximum values of the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase and the contents of malondialdehyde and proline (Pro) during drought increased by 51.9 %, 15.1 %, 40.4 %, and 157.2 %, respectively, compared with those of the control group. The activity of catalase primarily increased after rehydration, and the maximum value was 1.5-fold that of the control group. After 14 days of rehydration, the physiological index values ​​of multiple treatments can be restored to the level of control, which proves that the physiological response within the range of 45 %–85 % FC water change is reversible. Based on the experimental data of the two seasons, the changes in activity of SOD and content of Pro more effectively reflect the changes in soil moisture than the other indicators (ROC analysis, AUC = 0.720−0.978) and have a significant correlation with yield (P < 0.05). Therefore, they can be considered as physiological reference tools to monitor the effect of irrigation and adjust its strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Mu, Qing & Cai, Huanjie & Sun, Shikun & Wen, Shanshan & Xu, Jiatun & Dong, Mengqi & Saddique, Qaisar, 2021. "The physiological response of winter wheat under short-term drought conditions and the sensitivity of different indices to soil water changes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:243:y:2021:i:c:s0378377420313275
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377420313275
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106475?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mustafa, S.M.T. & Vanuytrecht, E. & Huysmans, M., 2017. "Combined deficit irrigation and soil fertility management on different soil textures to improve wheat yield in drought-prone Bangladesh," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 124-137.
    2. Costa, J.M. & Egipto, R. & Sánchez-Virosta, A. & Lopes, C.M. & Chaves, M.M., 2019. "Canopy and soil thermal patterns to support water and heat stress management in vineyards," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 484-496.
    3. Sánchez-Virosta, A & Léllis, B.C & Pardo, J.J & Martínez-Romero, A & Sánchez-Gómez, D & Domínguez, A, 2020. "Functional response of garlic to optimized regulated deficit irrigation (ORDI) across crop stages and years: Is physiological performance impaired at the most sensitive stages to water deficit?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    4. Julia Bailey-Serres & Jane E. Parker & Elizabeth A. Ainsworth & Giles E. D. Oldroyd & Julian I. Schroeder, 2019. "Genetic strategies for improving crop yields," Nature, Nature, vol. 575(7781), pages 109-118, November.
    5. Hanjra, Munir A. & Qureshi, M. Ejaz, 2010. "Global water crisis and future food security in an era of climate change," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 365-377, October.
    6. Intrigliolo, D.S. & Lizama, V. & García-Esparza, M.J. & Abrisqueta, I. & Álvarez, I., 2016. "Effects of post-veraison irrigation regime on Cabernet Sauvignon grapevines in Valencia, Spain: Yield and grape composition," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 110-119.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mu, Qing & Xu, Jiatun & Yu, Miao & Guo, Zijian & Dong, Mengqi & Cao, Yuxin & Zhang, Suiqi & Sun, Shikun & Cai, Huanjie, 2022. "Physiological response of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) during vegetative growth to gradual, persistent and intermittent drought," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    2. Li, Rui & Chai, Shouxi & Chai, Yuwei & Li, Yawei & Lan, Xuemei & Ma, Jiantao & Cheng, Hongbo & Chang, Lei, 2021. "Mulching optimizes water consumption characteristics and improves crop water productivity on the semi-arid Loess Plateau of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    3. Wang, Bo & van Dam, Jos & Yang, Xiaolin & Ritsema, Coen & Du, Taisheng & Kang, Shaozhong, 2023. "Reducing water productivity gap by optimizing irrigation regime for winter wheat-summer maize system in the North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    4. Xin Zhang & Jianheng Zhang & Jiaxin Xue & Guiyan Wang, 2023. "Improving Wheat Yield and Water-Use Efficiency by Optimizing Irrigations in Northern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Abdol Rassoul Zarei & Mohammad Mehdi Moghimi & Elham Koohi, 2021. "Sensitivity Assessment to the Occurrence of Different Types of Droughts Using GIS and AHP Techniques," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(11), pages 3593-3615, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pardo, J.J. & Sánchez-Virosta, A. & Léllis, B.C. & Domínguez, A. & Martínez-Romero, A., 2022. "Physiological basis to assess barley response to optimized regulated deficit irrigation for limited volumes of water (ORDIL)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    2. Pelai, Ricardo & Hagerman, Shannon M. & Kozak, Robert, 2020. "Biotechnologies in agriculture and forestry: Governance insights from a comparative systematic review of barriers and recommendations," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    3. Rahmani, Javad & Danesh-Yazdi, Mohammad, 2022. "Quantifying the impacts of agricultural alteration and climate change on the water cycle dynamics in a headwater catchment of Lake Urmia Basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    4. Liu, Jing & Hertel, Thomas & Lammers, Richard & Prusevich, Alexander & Baldos, Uris Lantz & Grogan, Danielle & Frolking, Steve, 2016. "Achieving Sustainable Irrigation Water Withdrawals: Global Impacts on Food Production and Land Use," Conference papers 332691, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    5. Ci Kong & Yin Yang & Tiancong Qi & Shuyi Zhang, 2025. "Predictive genetic circuit design for phenotype reprogramming in plants," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Kang, Shaozhong & Hao, Xinmei & Du, Taisheng & Tong, Ling & Su, Xiaoling & Lu, Hongna & Li, Xiaolin & Huo, Zailin & Li, Sien & Ding, Risheng, 2017. "Improving agricultural water productivity to ensure food security in China under changing environment: From research to practice," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 5-17.
    7. Ozgul Calicioglu & Alessandro Flammini & Stefania Bracco & Lorenzo Bellù & Ralph Sims, 2019. "The Future Challenges of Food and Agriculture: An Integrated Analysis of Trends and Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, January.
    8. Romero, Pascual & Navarro, Josefa María & Ordaz, Pablo Botía, 2022. "Towards a sustainable viticulture: The combination of deficit irrigation strategies and agroecological practices in Mediterranean vineyards. A review and update," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    9. Jiang, Qiang & Grafton, R. Quentin, 2012. "Economic effects of climate change in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 10-16.
    10. Ramesh P. Rudra & Balew A. Mekonnen & Rituraj Shukla & Narayan Kumar Shrestha & Pradeep K. Goel & Prasad Daggupati & Asim Biswas, 2020. "Currents Status, Challenges, and Future Directions in Identifying Critical Source Areas for Non-Point Source Pollution in Canadian Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-25, October.
    11. Kübra Akyol Özcan, 2023. "Food Price Bubbles: Food Price Indices of Turkey, the FAO, the OECD, and the IMF," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    12. Luis Santos Pereira, 2017. "Water, Agriculture and Food: Challenges and Issues," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(10), pages 2985-2999, August.
    13. Kurup, Suresh A. & Reddy, A. Amarender & Singh, Dharm Raj & Praveen, K.V, 2021. "Risks in Rainfed Agriculture and Adaptation Strategies in India: Profile and Socio-Economic Correlates," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315127, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Andrew J. Wiltshire & Gillian Kay & Jemma L. Gornall & Richard A. Betts, 2013. "The Impact of Climate, CO 2 and Population on Regional Food and Water Resources in the 2050s," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(5), pages 1-23, May.
    15. Maraseni, Tek Narayan & Cockfield, Geoff, 2015. "The financial implications of converting farmland to state-supported environmental plantings in the Darling Downs region, Queensland," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 57-65.
    16. Mercedes Campi & Marco Duenas & Giorgio Fagiolo, 2019. "How do countries specialize in food production? A complex-network analysis of the global agricultural product space," LEM Papers Series 2019/37, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    17. Ru Fang, Yan & Zhang, Silu & Zhou, Ziqiao & Shi, Wenjun & Hui Xie, Guang, 2022. "Sustainable development in China: Valuation of bioenergy potential and CO2 reduction from crop straw," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    18. Daniel Otero Peña & Daniela Perrotti & Eugene Mohareb, 2022. "Advancing urban metabolism studies through GIS data: Resource flows, open space networks, and vulnerable communities in Mexico City," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1333-1349, August.
    19. Distefano, Tiziano & Chiarotti, Guido & Laio, Francesco & Ridolfi, Luca, 2019. "Spatial Distribution of the International Food Prices: Unexpected Heterogeneity and Randomness," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 122-132.
    20. Rouzaneh, Davoud & Yazdanpanah, Masoud & Jahromi, Arman Bakhshi, 2021. "Evaluating micro-irrigation system performance through assessment of farmers' satisfaction: implications for adoption, longevity, and water use efficiency," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:243:y:2021:i:c:s0378377420313275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.