IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v148y2015icp84-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of hourly and daily reference crop evapotranspiration equations across seasons and climate zones in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Perera, Kushan C.
  • Western, Andrew W.
  • Nawarathna, Bandara
  • George, Biju

Abstract

Estimates from the FAO Penman–Monteith (FAO-PM) and the standardized ASCE Penman–Monteith (ASCE-PM) hourly and daily reference evapotranspiration (ET0) equations were compared at daily scale, based on the hourly climate data collected from forty (40) geographically and climatologically diverse Automatic Weather Stations (AWS) across the Australian continent. These locations represent 23 agricultural irrigation areas in tropical, arid and temperate climates. The aims of this paper are to: compare the effects of different methods of estimating Clear-sky-radiation—(Rso); compare sum-of-hourly and daily ET0; compare the results of aggregation of hourly ET0 over 24h compared with daylight hours; and examine the impact of seasonality and climate type. At selected AWS locations, the hourly ET0 was calculated using the hourly FAO-PM and the ASCE-PM equations and then summed to derive daily ET0 (reported as ET0,soh). This was compared against the daily ET0 values, calculated using the corresponding daily equation (reported as ET0,daily). Using Rso calculated following the “complex” approach improves the agreement between ET0,soh and ET0,daily of both hourly equations, compared with the “simple” approach. Better agreement between ET0,soh and ET0,daily estimates for the FAO-PM and ASCE-PM were found, when the hourly values are aggregated over 24h rather than over daylight hours. The average ratio between ET0,soh and ET0,daily for the FAO-PM and ASCE-PM equations is 0.95 and 1.00, respectively. The range of the former is 0.90–0.98 and that of the latter is 0.96–1.04. There was very strong correlation between the two hourly equations at the daily time step: on average 0.997, with a range of 0.993–0.998. The results imply that the ASCE-PM hourly equation's daily ET0 values are higher than those of FAO-PM, which can be explained by the difference in the treatment of surface resistances. Better agreements between ET0,soh and ET0,daily values for winter, spring and autumn were found for the FAO-PM version, while during summer, the ASCE-PM version showed better agreement. The best agreement between the hourly and daily results for the FAO-PM version was found in temperate climates and the ASCE-PM version showed best agreement in the tropical and arid climates.

Suggested Citation

  • Perera, Kushan C. & Western, Andrew W. & Nawarathna, Bandara & George, Biju, 2015. "Comparison of hourly and daily reference crop evapotranspiration equations across seasons and climate zones in Australia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 84-96.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:148:y:2015:i:c:p:84-96
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.09.016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037837741400287X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2014.09.016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Allen, Richard G. & Pruitt, William O. & Wright, James L. & Howell, Terry A. & Ventura, Francesca & Snyder, Richard & Itenfisu, Daniel & Steduto, Pasquale & Berengena, Joaquin & Yrisarry, Javier Basel, 2006. "A recommendation on standardized surface resistance for hourly calculation of reference ETo by the FAO56 Penman-Monteith method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 81(1-2), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Chiew, F. H. S. & Kamaladasa, N. N. & Malano, H. M. & McMahon, T. A., 1995. "Penman-Monteith, FAO-24 reference crop evapotranspiration and class-A pan data in Australia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 9-21, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Xiaoying & Xu, Chunying & Zhong, Xiuli & Li, Yuzhong & Yuan, Xiaohuan & Cao, Jingfeng, 2017. "Comparison of 16 models for reference crop evapotranspiration against weighing lysimeter measurement," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 145-155.
    2. Althoff, Daniel & Filgueiras, Roberto & Dias, Santos Henrique Brant & Rodrigues, Lineu Neiva, 2019. "Impact of sum-of-hourly and daily timesteps in the computations of reference evapotranspiration across the Brazilian territory," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    3. Ji, X.B. & Chen, J.M. & Zhao, W.Z. & Kang, E.S. & Jin, B.W. & Xu, S.Q., 2017. "Comparison of hourly and daily Penman-Monteith grass- and alfalfa-reference evapotranspiration equations and crop coefficients for maize under arid climatic conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 1-11.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Yang & Cui, Yuanlai & Luo, Yufeng & Lyu, Xinwei & Traore, Seydou & Khan, Shahbaz & Wang, Weiguang, 2016. "Short-term forecasting of daily reference evapotranspiration using the Penman-Monteith model and public weather forecasts," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 329-339.
    2. Gonçalo C. Rodrigues & Ricardo P. Braga, 2021. "Estimation of Reference Evapotranspiration during the Irrigation Season Using Nine Temperature-Based Methods in a Hot-Summer Mediterranean Climate," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Panagiotis Christias & Ioannis N. Daliakopoulos & Thrassyvoulos Manios & Mariana Mocanu, 2020. "Comparison of Three Computational Approaches for Tree Crop Irrigation Decision Support," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-26, May.
    4. Chintala, Syam & Karimindla, Arun Rao & Kambhammettu, BVN P., 2024. "Scaling relations between leaf and plant water use efficiencies in rainfed Cotton," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    5. Choudhury, B.U. & Singh, Anil Kumar & Pradhan, S., 2013. "Estimation of crop coefficients of dry-seeded irrigated rice–wheat rotation on raised beds by field water balance method in the Indo-Gangetic plains, India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 20-31.
    6. Althoff, Daniel & Filgueiras, Roberto & Dias, Santos Henrique Brant & Rodrigues, Lineu Neiva, 2019. "Impact of sum-of-hourly and daily timesteps in the computations of reference evapotranspiration across the Brazilian territory," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    7. Pozníková, Gabriela & Fischer, Milan & van Kesteren, Bram & Orság, Matěj & Hlavinka, Petr & Žalud, Zdeněk & Trnka, Miroslav, 2018. "Quantifying turbulent energy fluxes and evapotranspiration in agricultural field conditions: A comparison of micrometeorological methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 249-263.
    8. Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Melton, F. & Johnson, L. & Mota, M. & Wang, T., 2021. "Prediction of crop coefficients from fraction of ground cover and height: Practical application to vegetable, field and fruit crops with focus on parameterization," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    9. Luis Santos Pereira, 2017. "Water, Agriculture and Food: Challenges and Issues," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(10), pages 2985-2999, August.
    10. Laura Şmuleac & Ciprian Rujescu & Adrian Șmuleac & Florin Imbrea & Isidora Radulov & Dan Manea & Anișoara Ienciu & Tabita Adamov & Raul Pașcalău, 2020. "Impact of Climate Change in the Banat Plain, Western Romania, on the Accessibility of Water for Crop Production in Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, September.
    11. Asmamaw, Desale Kidane & Janssens, Pieter & Dessie, Mekete & Tilahun, Seifu A. & Adgo, Enyew & Nyssen, Jan & Walraevens, Kristine & Assaye, Habtamu & Yenehun, Alemu & Nigate, Fenta & Cornelis, Wim M., 2023. "Effect of deficit irrigation and soil fertility management on wheat production and water productivity in the Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    12. Consoli, S. & Stagno, F. & Roccuzzo, G. & Cirelli, G.L. & Intrigliolo, F., 2014. "Sustainable management of limited water resources in a young orange orchard," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 60-68.
    13. Bastidas-Obando, E. & Bastiaanssen, W.G.M. & Jarmain, C., 2017. "Estimation of transpiration fluxes from rainfed and irrigated sugarcane in South Africa using a canopy resistance and crop coefficient model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 94-107.
    14. Cécile Couharde & Rémi Generoso, 2023. "The financial cost of stabilizing US farm income under climate change," Working Papers hal-04159823, HAL.
    15. Xing, Liwen & Zhao, Lu & Cui, Ningbo & Liu, Chunwei & Guo, Li & Du, Taisheng & Wu, Zongjun & Gong, Daozhi & Jiang, Shouzheng, 2023. "Apple tree transpiration estimated using the Penman-Monteith model integrated with optimized jarvis model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    16. Noemi Mancosu & Donatella Spano & Morteza Orang & Sara Sarreshteh & Richard Snyder, 2016. "SIMETAW# - a Model for Agricultural Water Demand Planning," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(2), pages 541-557, January.
    17. Widmoser, Peter, 2009. "A discussion on and alternative to the Penman-Monteith equation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(4), pages 711-721, April.
    18. Krishna Bhartiya & Aniruddha Ghare, 2014. "Relative humidity based model for estimation of reference evapotranspiration for western plateau and hills region of India," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(10), pages 3355-3364, August.
    19. Zanotelli, Damiano & Montagnani, Leonardo & Andreotti, Carlo & Tagliavini, Massimo, 2019. "Evapotranspiration and crop coefficient patterns of an apple orchard in a sub-humid environment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    20. Yan, Haofang & Acquah, Samuel Joe & Zhang, Chuan & Wang, Guoqing & Huang, Song & Zhang, Hengnian & Zhao, Baoshan & Wu, Haimei, 2019. "Energy partitioning of greenhouse cucumber based on the application of Penman-Monteith and Bulk Transfer models," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 201-211.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:148:y:2015:i:c:p:84-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.