IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v209y2018icp249-263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying turbulent energy fluxes and evapotranspiration in agricultural field conditions: A comparison of micrometeorological methods

Author

Listed:
  • Pozníková, Gabriela
  • Fischer, Milan
  • van Kesteren, Bram
  • Orság, Matěj
  • Hlavinka, Petr
  • Žalud, Zdeněk
  • Trnka, Miroslav

Abstract

Accurate estimation of energy fluxes and evapotranspiration (ET) in agricultural systems is critically needed, especially for water resource sustainability, soil moisture monitoring and irrigation. Numerous micrometeorological methods have become commercially available. Considering the eventual trade-off between cost and accuracy, it is important to evaluate these methods to provide recommendations for practical purposes. Therefore, we tested five different techniques at one field in the region of Central Europe dominated by rainfed farming but suffers from drought spells. In an intensive campaign, we used eddy covariance (EC), large aperture and surface layer scintillometers, the Bowen ratio energy balance (BREB), and the surface renewal (SR) methods to estimate the sensible (H) and latent (λET) heat fluxes of winter wheat and bare soil with harvest residues during two months in summer 2015. At the half-hourly level, the methods showed varying agreement under different field conditions. While H estimated by EC and scintillometry agreed well, there was an underestimation of λET by EC compared to the other methods, most likely due to energy balance non-closure. The λET estimated by the BREB method showed good agreement with the λET obtained by scintillometry when the Bowen ratio (β) was high and with the λET obtained by EC when β→ 0. Our study confirmed good reliability of scintillometers across wide range of meteorological conditions. Although the SR method provided the most inferior agreement with other methods at half-hourly basis, it was deemed to be valuable when longer averaging periods were used. Over the entire experiment, mean daily ET estimated by scintillometry (2.6 mm d−1), BREB (2.3 mm d−1), and SR (2.9 mm d−1) showed reasonable agreement while EC (1.6 mm d−1) significantly underestimated. This indicates that low cost methods (BREB and SR) are sufficient for water management purposes when a daily and longer time scales are important. Further, parallel deploying of BREB and SR can provide additional diagnostics and increase the confidence in ET estimates.

Suggested Citation

  • Pozníková, Gabriela & Fischer, Milan & van Kesteren, Bram & Orság, Matěj & Hlavinka, Petr & Žalud, Zdeněk & Trnka, Miroslav, 2018. "Quantifying turbulent energy fluxes and evapotranspiration in agricultural field conditions: A comparison of micrometeorological methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 249-263.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:209:y:2018:i:c:p:249-263
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.07.041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377418311296
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.07.041?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Uddin, J. & Hancock, N.H. & Smith, R.J. & Foley, J.P., 2013. "Measurement of evapotranspiration during sprinkler irrigation using a precision energy budget (Bowen ratio, eddy covariance) methodology," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 89-100.
    2. Zapata, N. & Martinez-Cob, A., 2002. "Evaluation of the surface renewal method to estimate wheat evapotranspiration," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 141-157, June.
    3. Allen, Richard G. & Pereira, Luis S. & Howell, Terry A. & Jensen, Marvin E., 2011. "Evapotranspiration information reporting: II. Recommended documentation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(6), pages 921-929, April.
    4. Allen, Richard G. & Pereira, Luis S. & Howell, Terry A. & Jensen, Marvin E., 2011. "Evapotranspiration information reporting: I. Factors governing measurement accuracy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(6), pages 899-920, April.
    5. Allen, Richard G. & Pruitt, William O. & Wright, James L. & Howell, Terry A. & Ventura, Francesca & Snyder, Richard & Itenfisu, Daniel & Steduto, Pasquale & Berengena, Joaquin & Yrisarry, Javier Basel, 2006. "A recommendation on standardized surface resistance for hourly calculation of reference ETo by the FAO56 Penman-Monteith method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 81(1-2), pages 1-22, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yan, Haofang & Li, Mi & Zhang, Chuan & Zhang, Jianyun & Wang, Guoqing & Yu, Jianjun & Ma, Jiamin & Zhao, Shuang, 2022. "Comparison of evapotranspiration upscaling methods from instantaneous to daytime scale for tea and wheat in southeast China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    2. Granata, Francesco, 2019. "Evapotranspiration evaluation models based on machine learning algorithms—A comparative study," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 303-315.
    3. Yan, Haofang & Yu, Jianjun & Zhang, Chuan & Wang, Guoqing & Huang, Song & Ma, Jiamin, 2021. "Comparison of two canopy resistance models to estimate evapotranspiration for tea and wheat in southeast China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Escarabajal-Henarejos, D. & Fernández-Pacheco, D.G. & Molina-Martínez, J.M. & Martínez-Molina, L. & Ruiz-Canales, A., 2015. "Selection of device to determine temperature gradients for estimating evapotranspiration using energy balance method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 136-147.
    2. Darouich, Hanaa & Karfoul, Razan & Ramos, Tiago B. & Moustafa, Ali & Shaheen, Baraa & Pereira, Luis S., 2021. "Crop water requirements and crop coefficients for jute mallow (Corchorus olitorius L.) using the SIMDualKc model and assessing irrigation strategies for the Syrian Akkar region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    3. Fuentes, Sigfredo & Ortega-Farías, Samuel & Carrasco-Benavides, Marcos & Tongson, Eden & Gonzalez Viejo, Claudia, 2024. "Actual evapotranspiration and energy balance estimation from vineyards using micro-meteorological data and machine learning modeling," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    4. Laura Şmuleac & Ciprian Rujescu & Adrian Șmuleac & Florin Imbrea & Isidora Radulov & Dan Manea & Anișoara Ienciu & Tabita Adamov & Raul Pașcalău, 2020. "Impact of Climate Change in the Banat Plain, Western Romania, on the Accessibility of Water for Crop Production in Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, September.
    5. da Silva, Israel W.H. & Marques, Thiago V. & Urbano, Stela A. & Mendes, Keila R. & Oliveira, Ane Caroline C.F. & Nascimento, Fábio da S. & de Morais, Leonardo Fiusa & Pereira, Waldeir dos S. & Mutti, , 2024. "Meteorological and biophysical controls of evapotranspiration in tropical grazed pasture under rainfed conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    6. Liu, Meihan & Paredes, Paula & Shi, Haibin & Ramos, Tiago B. & Dou, Xu & Dai, Liping & Pereira, Luis S., 2022. "Impacts of a shallow saline water table on maize evapotranspiration and groundwater contribution using static water table lysimeters and the dual Kc water balance model SIMDualKc," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    7. Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Hunsaker, D.J. & López-Urrea, R. & Mohammadi Shad, Z., 2021. "Standard single and basal crop coefficients for field crops. Updates and advances to the FAO56 crop water requirements method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    8. Liu, Meihan & Shi, Haibin & Paredes, Paula & Ramos, Tiago B. & Dai, Liping & Feng, Zhuangzhuang & Pereira, Luis S., 2022. "Estimating and partitioning maize evapotranspiration as affected by salinity using weighing lysimeters and the SIMDualKc model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    9. Qiu, Rangjian & Li, Longan & Liu, Chunwei & Wang, Zhenchang & Zhang, Baozhong & Liu, Zhandong, 2022. "Evapotranspiration estimation using a modified crop coefficient model in a rotated rice-winter wheat system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    10. Anapalli, Saseendran S. & Green, Timothy R. & Reddy, Krishna N. & Gowda, Prasanna H. & Sui, Ruixiu & Fisher, Daniel K. & Moorhead, Jerry E. & Marek, Gary W., 2018. "Application of an energy balance method for estimating evapotranspiration in cropping systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 107-117.
    11. Ji, X.B. & Chen, J.M. & Zhao, W.Z. & Kang, E.S. & Jin, B.W. & Xu, S.Q., 2017. "Comparison of hourly and daily Penman-Monteith grass- and alfalfa-reference evapotranspiration equations and crop coefficients for maize under arid climatic conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 1-11.
    12. Raziei, Tayeb & Pereira, Luis S., 2013. "Estimation of ETo with Hargreaves–Samani and FAO-PM temperature methods for a wide range of climates in Iran," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 1-18.
    13. Feng, Jiaojiao & Wang, Weizhen & Che, Tao & Xu, Feinan, 2023. "Performance of the improved two-source energy balance model for estimating evapotranspiration over the heterogeneous surface," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    14. Machakaire, A.T.B. & Steyn, J.M. & Franke, A.C., 2021. "Assessing evapotranspiration and crop coefficients of potato in a semi-arid climate using Eddy Covariance techniques," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    15. Moratiel, R. & Martínez-Cob, A. & Tarquis, A.M. & Snyder, R.L., 2016. "Soil water balance correction due to light rainfall, dew and fog in Ebro river basin (Spain)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 61-67.
    16. Snyder, R.L. & Pedras, C. & Montazar, A. & Henry, J.M. & Ackley, D., 2015. "Advances in ET-based landscape irrigation management," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 187-197.
    17. Rana Muhammad Adnan & Salim Heddam & Zaher Mundher Yaseen & Shamsuddin Shahid & Ozgur Kisi & Binquan Li, 2020. "Prediction of Potential Evapotranspiration Using Temperature-Based Heuristic Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    18. Toureiro, Célia & Serralheiro, Ricardo & Shahidian, Shakib & Sousa, Adélia, 2017. "Irrigation management with remote sensing: Evaluating irrigation requirement for maize under Mediterranean climate condition," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 211-220.
    19. Paredes, P. & Pereira, L.S. & Almorox, J. & Darouich, H., 2020. "Reference grass evapotranspiration with reduced data sets: Parameterization of the FAO Penman-Monteith temperature approach and the Hargeaves-Samani equation using local climatic variables," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    20. Nouri, Milad & Homaee, Mehdi, 2022. "Reference crop evapotranspiration for data-sparse regions using reanalysis products," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:209:y:2018:i:c:p:249-263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.