IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dug/actaec/y2012i2p18-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying the Reducing Resistance to Change Phase in an Organizational Change Model

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela Bradutanu

    (West University of Timisoara, Romania)

Abstract

In this article we examine where in an organizational change process it is better to place the reducing resistance to change phase, so that employees would accept the new changes easier and not manifest too much resistance. After analyzing twelve organizational change models we have concluded that the place of the reducing resistance to change phase in an organizational change process is not the same, it being modified according to the type of change. The results of this study are helpful for researchers, but especially for organizational change leaders. As change leaders are usually the ones confronted with resistance from their subordinates, they must know exactly how to deal with it and when is the best moment to reduce it, depending on the type of change that is desired to be implemented. The key contribution to this paper is that the best way to gain employee’s support and change attachment is to try and reduce resistance to change before the actual implementation. Only when an immediate or imposed change is required to be implemented, the methods and ways for overcoming resistance should be applied during and after the implementation stage, to ensure a successful implementation of the change.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela Bradutanu, 2012. "Identifying the Reducing Resistance to Change Phase in an Organizational Change Model," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 2(2), pages 18-26, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2012:i:2:p:18-26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/oeconomica/article/view/1270/1108
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Prediscan Mariana & Sacui Violeta, 2011. "Opportunity To Reduce Resistance To Change In A Process Of Organizational Change," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 698-702, December.
    2. Thomas, Robyn & Hardy, Cynthia, 2011. "Reframing resistance to organizational change," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 322-331, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rafael Alcadipani & John Hassard & Gazi Islam, 2018. "“ I Shot the Sheriff ”: Irony, Sarcasm and the Changing Nature of Workplace Resistance," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) halshs-01959081, HAL.
    2. Vos, Janita F.J. & Rupert, Joyce, 2018. "Change agent's contribution to recipients' resistance to change: A two-sided story," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 453-462.
    3. Cynthia Hardy & Robyn Thomas, 2014. "Strategy, Discourse and Practice: The Intensification of Power," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(2), pages 320-348, March.
    4. Margaret Hodgins, 2021. "Taking on the Institution: An Autoethnographic Account," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Prediscan Mariana & Bradutanu Daniela & Roiban Roxana Nadina, 2013. "Forces That Enhance Or Reduce Employee Resistance To Change," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 1606-1612, July.
    6. Rafael Alcadipani & John Hassard & Gazi Islam, 2018. "“ I Shot the Sheriff ”: Irony, Sarcasm and the Changing Nature of Workplace Resistance," Post-Print halshs-01959081, HAL.
    7. Plotnikof, Mie & Pedersen, Anne Reff, 2019. "Exploring resistance in collaborative forms of governance: Meaning negotiations and counter-narratives in a case from the Danish education sector," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(4).
    8. Nancy Beauregard & Louise Lemyre & Jacques Barrette, 2015. "The Domains of Organizational Learning Practices: An Agency-Structure Perspective," Societies, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-21, October.
    9. Gabriele Jacobs & Anne Keegan, 2018. "Ethical Considerations and Change Recipients’ Reactions: ‘It’s Not All About Me’," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 73-90, September.
    10. Daniela Bradutanu, 2015. "A Reducing Resistance to Change Model," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 11(5), pages 114-120, October.
    11. Sunghee Park & Neil Lunt, 2018. "Productive Resistance within the Korean Public Sector: Exploring Organisational Culture," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 279-297, September.
    12. Endrejat, Paul C. & Klonek, Florian E. & Müller-Frommeyer, Lena C. & Kauffeld, Simone, 2021. "Turning change resistance into readiness: How change agents’ communication shapes recipient reactions," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 595-604.
    13. repec:dau:papers:123456789/15194 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Lansu, M. & Bleijenbergh, I. & Benschop, Y., 2020. "Just talking? Middle managers negotiating problem ownership in gender equality interventions," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(2).
    15. Omanović, Vedran, 2013. "Opening and closing the door to diversity: A dialectical analysis of the social production of diversity," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 87-103.
    16. Sørensen, Ole H. & Hasle, Peter & Pejtersen, Jan H., 2011. "Trust relations in management of change," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 405-417.
    17. Christiansen, Ulrik & Kjærgaard, Annemette & Hartmann, Rasmus Koss, 2012. "Working in the shadows: Understanding ERP usage as complex responsive processes of conversations in the daily practices of a Special Operations Force," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 173-184.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2012:i:2:p:18-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Daniela Robu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fedanro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.