IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v5y2020i4p347-357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Look How Many Gays There Are Here”: Digital Technologies and Non-Heterosexual Space in Haikou

Author

Listed:
  • James Cummings

    (School of Art, Media and American Studies, University of East Anglia, UK)

Abstract

This article explores the capacities of digital technologies to disrupt, redefine and multiply urban spaces, creating new ways of seeing and experiencing cities. Based on ethnographic research into the lives of men who desire men in Haikou, People’s Republic of China, and their uses of the location-aware dating app Blued, I show how the city is produced anew as a space imagined and engaged in relation to the perceptible presence of other men who desire men. In a sociopolitical context in which non-heterosexual lives are largely invisible in public spaces, the digitally mediated visibility of Blued users to one another invites a range of social practices through which urban spaces, as well as spatial categories of ‘the urban’ and ‘the rural,’ are reproduced at the intersections of sexuality, space and digital technologies. With its empirical focus on an ‘ordinary’ city in a non-Western context, this article challenges both the Eurocentricity of much digital geographies research and its tendency to focus on global cities.

Suggested Citation

  • James Cummings, 2020. "“Look How Many Gays There Are Here”: Digital Technologies and Non-Heterosexual Space in Haikou," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 347-357.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v5:y:2020:i:4:p:347-357
    DOI: 10.17645/up.v5i4.3484
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/3484
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.v5i4.3484?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Judy Wajcman, 2010. "Feminist theories of technology," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 34(1), pages 143-152, January.
    2. Chirag Rabari & Michael Storper, 2015. "Editor's choice The digital skin of cities: urban theory and research in the age of the sensored and metered city, ubiquitous computing and big data," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 8(1), pages 27-42.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James Cummings, 2020. "“Look How Many Gays There Are Here”: Digital Technologies and Non-Heterosexual Space in Haikou," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 347-357.
    2. Chiara Cavalieri & Michael Stas & Marcelo Rovira Torres, 2020. "The ‘Analogue City’: Mapping and Acting in Antwerp’s Digital Geographies," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 289-300.
    3. Rachel Brydolf-Horwitz, 2022. "Embodied and entangled: Slow violence and harm via digital technologies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(2), pages 391-408, March.
    4. Elisa Ughetto & Mariacristina Rossi & David Audretsch & Erik E. Lehmann, 2020. "Female entrepreneurship in the digital era," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 305-312, August.
    5. E.V. Popov, 2021. "Drivers of the Economy in the Context of the Coronavirus Pandemic," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 20(1), pages 5-30.
    6. Barbara Orser & Susan Coleman & Yanhong Li, 2020. "Progress or pinkwashing: who benefits from digital women-focused capital funds?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 363-387, August.
    7. Anuradha Mathrani & Rahila Umer & Tarushikha Sarvesh & Janak Adhikari, 2023. "Rural–Urban, Gender, and Digital Divides during the COVID-19 Lockdown: A Multi-Layered Study," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Dannenberg Peter & Braun Boris & Fuchs Martina & Revilla Diez Javier, 2018. "Dynamics in an unequal world," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, De Gruyter, vol. 62(2), pages 87-91, May.
    9. Philip Faulkner & Clive Lawson & Jochen Runde, 2010. "Theorising technology," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 34(1), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Amy Glasmeier & Susan Christopherson, 2015. "Thinking about smart cities," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 8(1), pages 3-12.
    11. Caroline Victoria Wamala, 2013. "I Have to Give an “I Can†Attitude," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(1), pages 21582440134, February.
    12. Emilia Rönkkö & Aulikki Herneoja & Essi Oikarinen, 2018. "Cybernetics and the 4D Smart City: Smartness as Awareness," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, April.
    13. Yalin Wang & Yaokuang Li & Juan Wu & Li Ling & Dan Long, 2023. "Does digitalization sufficiently empower female entrepreneurs? Evidence from their online gender identities and crowdfunding performance," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 325-348, June.
    14. Pucci, Paola & Vecchio, Giovanni, 2019. "Trespassing for mobilities. Operational directions for addressing mobile lives," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    15. Robyn Mayes & Penelope Williams & Paula McDonald, 2020. "Mums with cameras: Technological change, entrepreneurship and motherhood," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(6), pages 1468-1484, November.
    16. Libor Měsíček, 2015. "Context Sources and their Processing in Company Security," Acta Informatica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2015(1), pages 44-51.
    17. B. Zorina Khan, 2017. "Designing Women: Consumer Goods Innovations in Britain, France and the United States, 1750-1900," NBER Working Papers 23086, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Mónica Grau-Sarabia & Mayo Fuster-Morell, 2021. "Gender approaches in the study of the digital economy: a systematic literature review," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, December.
    19. David McGillivray & Severin Guillard & Emma Reid, 2020. "Urban Connective Action: The Case of Events Hosted in Public Space," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 252-266.
    20. Sawsan Abutabenjeh & Julius A. Nukpezah & Annus Azhar, 2022. "Do Smart Cities Technologies Contribute to Local Economic Development?," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 36(1), pages 3-16, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v5:y:2020:i:4:p:347-357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.