IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v34y2010i1p1-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Theorising technology

Author

Listed:
  • Philip Faulkner
  • Clive Lawson
  • Jochen Runde

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip Faulkner & Clive Lawson & Jochen Runde, 2010. "Theorising technology," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 34(1), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:34:y:2010:i:1:p:1-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/bep084
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Kroes, 2010. "Engineering and the dual nature of technical artefacts," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 34(1), pages 51-62, January.
    2. J. Stan Metcalfe, 2010. "Technology and economic theory," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 34(1), pages 153-171, January.
    3. Tony Smith, 2010. "Technological change in Capitalism: some Marxian themes," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 34(1), pages 203-212, January.
    4. Trevor Pinch, 2010. "On making infrastructure visible: putting the non-humans to rights," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 34(1), pages 77-89, January.
    5. Tim Ingold, 2010. "The textility of making," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 34(1), pages 91-102, January.
    6. Kurt Dopfer & John Foster & Jason Potts, 2004. "Micro-meso-macro," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 263-279, July.
    7. Giovanni Dosi & Marco Grazzi, 2010. "On the nature of technologies: knowledge, procedures, artifacts and production inputs," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 34(1), pages 173-184, January.
    8. Clive Lawson, 2009. "Ayres, Technology and Technical Objects," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 641-660.
    9. Wiebe E. Bijker, 2010. "How is technology made?--That is the question!," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 34(1), pages 63-76, January.
    10. Wanda J. Orlikowski, 2000. "Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 404-428, August.
    11. G. Harman, 2010. "Technology, objects and things in Heidegger," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 34(1), pages 17-25, January.
    12. Andrew Feenberg, 2010. "Marxism and the critique of social rationality: from surplus value to the politics of technology," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 34(1), pages 37-49, January.
    13. Jochen Runde & Matthew Jones & Kamal Munir & Lynne Nikolychuk, 2009. "On technological objects and the adoption of technological product innovations: rules, routines and the transition from analogue photography to digital imaging," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 33(1), pages 1-24, January.
    14. Anne Mayhew, 2010. "Clarence Ayres, technology, pragmatism and progress," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 34(1), pages 213-222, January.
    15. Judy Wajcman, 2010. "Feminist theories of technology," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 34(1), pages 143-152, January.
    16. Wanda J. Orlikowski, 2010. "The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering technology in management research," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 34(1), pages 125-141, January.
    17. Robert Aunger, 2010. "What's special about human technology?," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 34(1), pages 115-123, January.
    18. Carlota Perez, 2010. "Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 34(1), pages 185-202, January.
    19. Marcia-Anne Dobres, 2010. "Archaeologies of technology," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 34(1), pages 103-114, January.
    20. Christopher Freeman, 1991. "Innovation, Changes of Techno-Economic Paradigm and Biological Analogies in Economics," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 42(2), pages 211-232.
    21. Albert Borgmann, 2010. "Reality and technology," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 34(1), pages 27-35, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Catherine E. A. Mulligan & Phil Godsiff, 2023. "Datalism and Data Monopolies in the Era of A.I.: A Research Agenda," Papers 2307.08049, arXiv.org.
    2. Denolf, Janne.M. & Wognum, Nel P.M. & Trienekens, Jacques H. & van der Vorst, Jack G.A.J. & Omta, S.W.F. (Onno), 2012. "Towards a Supply-Chain Instrument to Monitor an Information Technology Implementation," 2012 International European Forum, February 13-17, 2012, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 144968, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    3. Imko Meyenburg, 2022. "A possibilist justification of the ontology of counterfactuals and forecasted states of economies in economic modelling," Working Papers hal-03751205, HAL.
    4. Kerschner, Christian & Ehlers, Melf-Hinrich, 2016. "A framework of attitudes towards technology in theory and practice," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 139-151.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Henning Schwardt, 2022. "Technology and social rules and norms in neo-Schumpeterian economics and in original institutional economics," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 75(303), pages 385-401.
    2. Catherine E. A. Mulligan & Phil Godsiff, 2023. "Datalism and Data Monopolies in the Era of A.I.: A Research Agenda," Papers 2307.08049, arXiv.org.
    3. Havas, Attila, 2016. "Recent economic theorising on innovation: Lessons for analysing social innovation," MPRA Paper 77385, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Anthony M. Endres & David A. Harper, 2012. "The kinetics of capital formation and economic organisation," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 36(4), pages 963-980.
    5. Pietro Moncada-Paternò-Castello, 2022. "Top R&D investors, structural change and the R&D growth performance of young and old firms," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 12(1), pages 1-33, March.
    6. Dragos Vieru & Pierre-Emmanuel Arduin, 2016. "Sharing Knowledge in a Shared Services Center Context: An Explanatory Case Study of the Dialectics of Formal and Informal Practices," Post-Print hal-01458031, HAL.
    7. Chad M. Baum, 2013. "Mass-Produced Food: the Rise and Fall of the Promise of Health and Safety," Papers on Economics and Evolution 2013-03, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    8. Rinaldo Evangelista, 2018. "Technology and Economic Development: The Schumpeterian Legacy," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 50(1), pages 136-153, March.
    9. Adhikari, Pawan & Upadhaya, Bedanand & Wijethilake, Chaminda & Dhakal Adhikari, Shovita, 2023. "The sociomateriality of digitalisation in Nepalese NGOs," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(5).
    10. Foster, John & Metcalfe, J. Stan, 2012. "Economic emergence: An evolutionary economic perspective," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 420-432.
    11. Claire Estagnasié, 2023. "‘Working the time’: Time self-management practices of remote workers," Post-Print hal-04450916, HAL.
    12. Aurélie Dudézert & Nathalie Mitev & Ewan Oiry, 2021. "Cultural metaphors and KMS appropriation: drawing on Astérix to understand non-use in a large French company," Post-Print hal-03227049, HAL.
    13. Yukika Awazu & Stefania Mariano & Sue Newell, 2019. "The mediating role of artifacts in position practice at work: Examples from a project-based context," Post-Print hal-02110757, HAL.
    14. Bowman, Gary & Parks, Ryan W., 2024. "Between episodes of strategy: Sociomateriality, sensemaking, and dysfunction in a scenario planning process," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    15. Riccardo Crescenzi & Simona Iammarino & Carolin Ioramashvili & Andres Rodriguez-Pose & Michael Storper, 2019. "The Geography of Innovation: Local Hotspots and Global Innovation Networks," WIPO Economic Research Working Papers 57, World Intellectual Property Organization - Economics and Statistics Division.
    16. Jarrahi, Mohammad Hossein & Sawyer, Steve, 2019. "Networks of innovation: the sociotechnical assemblage of tabletop computing," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(S).
    17. Paul M. Leonardi & Diane E. Bailey & Casey S. Pierce, 2019. "The Coevolution of Objects and Boundaries over Time: Materiality, Affordances, and Boundary Salience," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 665-686, June.
    18. Carpenter Juliet & Simme James & Conti Elisa & Povinelli Fabiana & Kipshagen Joschka Milan, 2012. "Innovation and New Path Creation: The Role of Niche Environments in the Development of the Wind Power Industry in Germany and the UK," European Spatial Research and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 19(2), pages 87-101, December.
    19. Simpson, Ace Volkmann & Cunha, Miguel Pina e & Clegg, Stewart, 2015. "Hybridity, sociomateriality and compassion: What happens when a river floods and a city's organizations respond?," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 375-386.
    20. Giovanni Bonifati, 2013. "Exaptation and emerging degeneracy in innovation processes," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 1-21, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:34:y:2010:i:1:p:1-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.