IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agisys/v221y2024ics0308521x2400283x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating stakeholder value network with strategic issue management for multi-stakeholder needs and requirements analysis of vertical farming systems

Author

Listed:
  • Feng, Yongbing
  • Gao, Guohua
  • Wang, Pengyu
  • Zhang, Zihua

Abstract

Vertical Farming Systems (VFSs) are considered an evolutionary jump in humanity's quest for a reliable, sustainable and healthier food supply, and their design and implementation require bringing multi-stakeholder together to achieve values co-creation. However, there is a lack of the qualitative and quantitative analysis from the perspective of multi-stakeholder's value exchange to explain the complex need relationships among related VFSs and their multi-stakeholder and a lack of the research on VFSs needs (VFSs-N) from the strategic issues view to consider the balance of conflicting needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng, Yongbing & Gao, Guohua & Wang, Pengyu & Zhang, Zihua, 2024. "Integrating stakeholder value network with strategic issue management for multi-stakeholder needs and requirements analysis of vertical farming systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:221:y:2024:i:c:s0308521x2400283x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X2400283X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104133?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Min, Xinyuan & Sok, Jaap & de Zwart, Feije & Oude Lansink, Alfons, 2024. "Multi-stakeholder multi-objective greenhouse design optimization," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    2. Francis J. Baumont De Oliveira & Scott Ferson & Ronald Dyer, 2021. "A Collaborative Decision Support System Framework for Vertical Farming Business Developments," International Journal of Decision Support System Technology (IJDSST), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 1-33, January.
    3. Hemeng Zhou & Kathrin Specht & Caitlin K. Kirby, 2022. "Consumers’ and Stakeholders’ Acceptance of Indoor Agritecture in Shanghai (China)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-28, February.
    4. Guilherme Lages Barbosa & Francisca Daiane Almeida Gadelha & Natalya Kublik & Alan Proctor & Lucas Reichelm & Emily Weissinger & Gregory M. Wohlleb & Rolf U. Halden, 2015. "Comparison of Land, Water, and Energy Requirements of Lettuce Grown Using Hydroponic vs. Conventional Agricultural Methods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-13, June.
    5. repec:igg:jdsst0:v:13:y:2021:i:1:p:34-66 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Daniel Petrovics & Mendel Giezen, 2022. "Planning for sustainable urban food systems: an analysis of the up-scaling potential of vertical farming," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(5), pages 785-808, April.
    7. Specht, Kathrin & Sanyé-Mengual, Esther, 2017. "Risks in urban rooftop agriculture: Assessing stakeholders’ perceptions to ensure efficient policymaking," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 13-21.
    8. Michael Martin & Elvira Molin, 2019. "Environmental Assessment of an Urban Vertical Hydroponic Farming System in Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-14, July.
    9. Kathrin Specht & Rosemarie Siebert & Susanne Thomaier, 2016. "Perception and acceptance of agricultural production in and on urban buildings (ZFarming): a qualitative study from Berlin, Germany," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 33(4), pages 753-769, December.
    10. Guohua Gao & Yongbing Feng & Zihua Zhang & Shuangyou Wang & Zizhao Yang, 2023. "Integrating SLP with simulation to design and evaluate facility layout for industrial head lettuce production," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 321(1), pages 209-240, February.
    11. Rose, David Christian & Wheeler, Rebecca & Winter, Michael & Lobley, Matt & Chivers, Charlotte-Anne, 2021. "Agriculture 4.0: Making it work for people, production, and the planet," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    12. Coyle, Bradford D. & Ellison, Brenna, 2017. "Will Consumers Find Vertically Farmed Produce "Out of Reach"?," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 32(01), pages 1-8.
    13. Xi Gu & Yoram Koren, 2022. "Mass-Individualisation – the twenty first century manufacturing paradigm," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(24), pages 7572-7587, December.
    14. Pereira, Brenda Medeiros & Santos Senna, Luiz Afonso dos & Lindau, Luis Antonio, 2018. "Stakeholder Value Network: Modeling key relationships for advancing towards high quality bus transit systems," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 386-393.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Garrett M. Broad & Wythe Marschall & Maya Ezzeddine, 2022. "Perceptions of high-tech controlled environment agriculture among local food consumers: using interviews to explore sense-making and connections to good food," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(1), pages 417-433, March.
    2. Caixia Ivy Gan & Ruth Soukoutou & Denise Maria Conroy, 2022. "Sustainability Framing of Controlled Environment Agriculture and Consumer Perceptions: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Donald Coon & Lauren Lindow & Ziynet Boz & Ana Martin-Ryals & Ying Zhang & Melanie Correll, 2024. "Reporting and practices of sustainability in controlled environment agriculture: a scoping review," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 301-326, June.
    4. Hemeng Zhou & Kathrin Specht & Caitlin K. Kirby, 2022. "Consumers’ and Stakeholders’ Acceptance of Indoor Agritecture in Shanghai (China)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-28, February.
    5. Mina, Giorgio & Peira, Giovanni & Bonadonna, Alessandro, 2023. "Public perception and social sustainability of indoor farming technologies: A systematic review," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    6. Drottberger, Annie & Zhang, Yizhi & Yong, Jean Wan Hong & Dubois, Marie-Claude, 2023. "Urban farming with rooftop greenhouses: A systematic literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    7. Kathrin Specht & Felix Zoll & Henrike Schümann & Julia Bela & Julia Kachel & Marcel Robischon, 2019. "How Will We Eat and Produce in the Cities of the Future? From Edible Insects to Vertical Farming—A Study on the Perception and Acceptability of New Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Mireia Ercilla-Montserrat & David Sanjuan-Delmás & Esther Sanyé-Mengual & Laura Calvet-Mir & Karla Banderas & Joan Rieradevall & Xavier Gabarrell, 2019. "Analysis of the consumer’s perception of urban food products from a soilless system in rooftop greenhouses: a case study from the Mediterranean area of Barcelona (Spain)," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(3), pages 375-393, September.
    9. Adrián Csordás & István Füzesi, 2023. "The Impact of Technophobia on Vertical Farms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, May.
    10. Ivy Caixia Gan & Denise Maria Conroy, 2024. "Control or Losing Control: Consumer Perceptions of Controlled Environment Agriculture (CEA) Based on Focus Group Findings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-15, June.
    11. Esther Sanyé-Mengual & Kathrin Specht & Erofili Grapsa & Francesco Orsini & Giorgio Gianquinto, 2019. "How Can Innovation in Urban Agriculture Contribute to Sustainability? A Characterization and Evaluation Study from Five Western European Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-31, August.
    12. Masseroni, Daniele & Gangi, Fabiola & Galli, Andrea & Ceriani, Rodolfo & De Gaetani, Carlo & Gandolfi, Claudio, 2022. "Behind the efficiency of border irrigation: Lesson learned in Northern Italy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    13. Nan Wang & Li Zhu & Yuanhao Bing & Liwei Chen & Shulang Fei, 2021. "Assessment of Urban Agriculture for Evidence-Based Food Planning: A Case Study in Chengdu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-17, March.
    14. Qureshi, Salman & Tarashkar, Mahsa & Matloobi, Mansour & Wang, Zhifang & Rahimi, Akbar, 2022. "Understanding the dynamics of urban horticulture by socially-oriented practices and populace perception: Seeking future outlook through a comprehensive review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    15. repec:ags:ijaeri:334605 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Mabel Adaeze Nwanojuo & Christian Kosisochukwu Anumudu & Helen Onyeaka, 2025. "Impact of Controlled Environment Agriculture (CEA) in Nigeria, a Review of the Future of Farming in Africa," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-25, January.
    17. Eun-Jung Choi & Doyun Lee & Sang-Min Lee, 2024. "Impact of Building Integrated Rooftop Greenhouse (BiRTG) on Heating and Cooling Energy Load: A Study Based on a Container with Rooftop Greenhouse," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, August.
    18. Monica Allaby & Graham K. MacDonald & Sarah Turner, 2021. "Growing pains: Small-scale farmer responses to an urban rooftop farming and online marketplace enterprise in Montréal, Canada," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(3), pages 677-692, September.
    19. Muhammad Azhar Ansari & Giovanni Ciampi & Sergio Sibilio, 2023. "Tackling Efficiency Challenges and Exploring Greenhouse-Integrated Organic Photovoltaics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-24, August.
    20. Kaya, Asli & Erturk, Hakan & Yalcin, Refet Ali, 2024. "Energy efficiency of solar illuminated vertical farms with different illumination strategies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    21. Rosmah Murdad & Mardiana Muhiddin & Wan Hurani Osman & Nor Elliza Tajidin & Zainol Haida & Azwan Awang & Mohamadu Boyie Jalloh, 2022. "Ensuring Urban Food Security in Malaysia during the COVID-19 Pandemic—Is Urban Farming the Answer? A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-24, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:221:y:2024:i:c:s0308521x2400283x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agsy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.