IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v52y2014i2p337-353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rebalancing EU Interest Representation? Associative Democracy and EU Funding of Civil Society Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Rosa Sanchez Salgado

Abstract

European Union (EU) funding of civil society organizations (CSOs) is a substantial and important part of EU governance, but study of such funding is scarce and theoretically underdeveloped. To fill this gap, this article analyzes the main features of EU funding of CSOs and its effects on the EU system of interest representation, drawing on policy documents and the EU register of interest representatives. The resulting analysis shows that EU funding of CSOs in the social sector tends to reflect many of the characteristics of the model of associative democracy. European funds are being directed to groups that voice the concerns of excluded groups and, in this way, address imbalances in EU interest representation. The EU also promotes certain healthy features among CSOs, since it restricts access to funding opportunities to interest groups fulfilling key normative criteria. Hence, the EU helps sustain, but does not significantly constrain, the development of European CSOs.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosa Sanchez Salgado, 2014. "Rebalancing EU Interest Representation? Associative Democracy and EU Funding of Civil Society Organizations," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 337-353, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:52:y:2014:i:2:p:337-353
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12092
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12092
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.12092?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christine Mahoney & Michael J. Beckstrand, 2011. "Following the Money: European Union Funding of Civil Society Organizations," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(6), pages 1339-1361, November.
    2. Sabine Saurugger, 2007. "Democratic ‘Misfit’? Conceptions of Civil Society Participation in France and the European Union," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55(2), pages 384-404, June.
    3. Michael W. Bauer, 2002. "The Commission and the Poverty Programmes," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 381-400, September.
    4. Greenwood, Justin, 2007. "Organized Civil Society and Democratic Legitimacy in the European Union," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(2), pages 333-357, April.
    5. Sabine Saurugger, 2007. "Democratic 'Misfit'? Conceptions of Civil Society Participation in France and the European Union," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55, pages 384-404, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meta Novak & Damjan Lajh, 2024. "New Kids on the Democracy Block: Europeanisation of Interest Groups in Central and Eastern Europe," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    2. Muamer Bezdrob & Daut Bajramović, 2020. "The Relevance of Participation of Civil Society Organizations in the Process of Formulation of Development Strategies at the Municipal Level," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 213-229, June.
    3. Oliver Huwyler, 2020. "Interest groups in the European Union and their hiring of political consultancies," European Union Politics, , vol. 21(2), pages 333-354, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Megan Horst & Nathan McClintock & Adrien Baysse-Lainé & Ségolène Darly & Flaminia Paddeu & Coline Perrin & Kristin Reynolds & Christophe-Toussaint Soulard, 2021. "Translating land justice through comparison: a US–French dialogue and research agenda," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(4), pages 865-880, December.
    2. Acar Kutay, 2017. "How Does the European Commission Create a European Civil Society with Words? A Discourse Theoretical Inquiry," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(5), pages 1094-1109, September.
    3. Teräväinen, Tuula & Lehtonen, Markku & Martiskainen, Mari, 2011. "Climate change, energy security, and risk--debating nuclear new build in Finland, France and the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3434-3442, June.
    4. Pierre Georges Van Wolleghem, 2017. "Why Implement without a Tangible Threat? The Effect of a Soft Instrument on National Migrant Integration Policies," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(5), pages 1127-1143, September.
    5. Tanja Börzel, 2010. "European Governance: Negotiation and Competition in the Shadow of Hierarchy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(2), pages 191-219, March.
    6. Seikel, Daniel, 2011. "Wie die Europäische Kommission Liberalisierung durchsetzt: Der Konflikt um das öffentlich-rechtliche Bankenwesen in Deutschland," MPIfG Discussion Paper 11/16, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    7. Meta Novak & Damjan Lajh, 2024. "New Kids on the Democracy Block: Europeanisation of Interest Groups in Central and Eastern Europe," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    8. Francesca Colli & Johan Adriaensen, 2020. "Lobbying the state or the market? A framework to study civil society organizations’ strategic behavior," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(3), pages 501-513, July.
    9. Arndt Wonka & Frank R Baumgartner & Christine Mahoney & Joost Berkhout, 2010. "Measuring the size and scope of the EU interest group population," European Union Politics, , vol. 11(3), pages 463-476, September.
    10. Joost Berkhout & David Lowery, 2010. "The changing demography of the EU interest system since 1990," European Union Politics, , vol. 11(3), pages 447-461, September.
    11. Vivien Schmidt, 2010. "Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisited - Input, Output and Throughput," KFG Working Papers p0021, Free University Berlin.
    12. Vincent Caby & Lise Frehen, 2021. "How to Produce and Measure Throughput Legitimacy? Lessons from a Systematic Literature Review," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(1), pages 226-236.
    13. Böhling, Kathrin, 2009. "Symbolic knowledge at work: Comitology and learning from experts in European technology policy [Symbolisches Wissen in der europäischen Technologiepolitik: Experten, Lernen und das Ausschusswesen]," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2009-301, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    14. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:47:y:2009:i::p:17-42 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Nicolle Zeegers, 2016. "Civil Society Organizations’ Participation in the EU and Its Challenges for Democratic Representation," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(4), pages 27-39.
    16. Åse Gornitzka & Cathrine Holst, 2015. "The Expert-Executive Nexus in the EU: An Introduction," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 1-12.
    17. Finke, Barbara, . "Civil society participation in EU governance," Living Reviews in European Governance (LREG), Institute for European integration research (EIF).
    18. Mary Daly, 2012. "Paradigms in EU social policy: a critical account of Europe 2020," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 18(3), pages 273-284, August.
    19. Ondřej Císař & Kateřina Vráblíková, 2013. "Transnational activism of social movement organizations: The effect of European Union funding on local groups in the Czech Republic," European Union Politics, , vol. 14(1), pages 140-160, March.
    20. María del Mar Alonso‐Almeida & Josep Llach & Frederic Marimon, 2014. "A Closer Look at the ‘Global Reporting Initiative’ Sustainability Reporting as a Tool to Implement Environmental and Social Policies: A Worldwide Sector Analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(6), pages 318-335, November.
    21. Åse Gornitzka & Ulf Sverdrup, 2015. "Societal Inclusion in Expert Venues: Participation of Interest Groups and Business in the European Commission Expert Groups," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 151-165.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:52:y:2014:i:2:p:337-353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.