IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/istatr/v88y2020i2p380-395.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Properties of h‐Likelihood Estimators in Clustered Data

Author

Listed:
  • Lee Youngjo
  • Gwangsu Kim

Abstract

We study properties of the maximum h‐likelihood estimators for random effects in clustered data. To define optimality in random effects predictions, several foundational concepts of statistics such as likelihood, unbiasedness, consistency, confidence distribution and the Cramer–Rao lower bound are extended. Exact probability statements about interval estimators for random effects can be made asymptotically without a prior assumption. Using the binary‐matched pair example, we illustrated that the use of random effects recover information, leading to the boon on estimating treatment effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee Youngjo & Gwangsu Kim, 2020. "Properties of h‐Likelihood Estimators in Clustered Data," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(2), pages 380-395, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:istatr:v:88:y:2020:i:2:p:380-395
    DOI: 10.1111/insr.12354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.12354
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/insr.12354?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yudi Pawitan & Youngjo Lee, 2017. "Wallet Game: Probability, Likelihood, and Extended Likelihood," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(2), pages 120-122, April.
    2. Min-ge Xie & Kesar Singh, 2013. "Confidence Distribution, the Frequentist Distribution Estimator of a Parameter: A Review," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 81(1), pages 3-39, April.
    3. Youngjo Lee & Jan F. Bjørnstad, 2013. "Extended likelihood approach to large-scale multiple testing," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 75(3), pages 553-575, June.
    4. Renjun Ma & Bent Jørgensen, 2007. "Nested generalized linear mixed models: an orthodox best linear unbiased predictor approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(4), pages 625-641, September.
    5. Patrick O. Perry, 2017. "Fast moment-based estimation for hierarchical models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(1), pages 267-291, January.
    6. Lee, Youngjo & Oh, Hee-Seok, 2014. "A new sparse variable selection via random-effect model," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 89-99.
    7. Fan J. & Li R., 2001. "Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1348-1360, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Zhanfeng & Noh, Maengseok & Lee, Youngjo & Shi, Jian Qing, 2021. "A general robust t-process regression model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Youngjo Lee & Gwangsu Kim, 2016. "H-likelihood Predictive Intervals for Unobservables," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 84(3), pages 487-505, December.
    2. Lee, Sangin & Lee, Youngjo & Pawitan, Yudi, 2018. "Sparse pathway-based prediction models for high-throughput molecular data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 125-135.
    3. Lee, Sangin & Pawitan, Yudi & Lee, Youngjo, 2015. "A random-effect model approach for group variable selection," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 147-157.
    4. Olivier Collignon & Jeongseop Han & Hyungmi An & Seungyoung Oh & Youngjo Lee, 2018. "Comparison of the modified unbounded penalty and the LASSO to select predictive genes of response to chemotherapy in breast cancer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, October.
    5. Randy C. S. Lai & Jan Hannig & Thomas C. M. Lee, 2015. "Generalized Fiducial Inference for Ultrahigh-Dimensional Regression," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(510), pages 760-772, June.
    6. Wei Wang & Shou‐En Lu & Jerry Q. Cheng & Minge Xie & John B. Kostis, 2022. "Multivariate survival analysis in big data: A divide‐and‐combine approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 852-866, September.
    7. Eunyoung Park & Sookhee Kwon & Jihoon Kwon & Richard Sylvester & Il Do Ha, 2020. "Penalized h‐likelihood approach for variable selection in AFT random‐effect models," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 74(1), pages 52-71, February.
    8. Tang, Lu & Zhou, Ling & Song, Peter X.-K., 2020. "Distributed simultaneous inference in generalized linear models via confidence distribution," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    9. Zhixuan Fu & Chirag R. Parikh & Bingqing Zhou, 2017. "Penalized variable selection in competing risks regression," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 353-376, July.
    10. Tutz, Gerhard & Pößnecker, Wolfgang & Uhlmann, Lorenz, 2015. "Variable selection in general multinomial logit models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 207-222.
    11. Guan, Wei & Gray, Alexander, 2013. "Sparse high-dimensional fractional-norm support vector machine via DC programming," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 136-148.
    12. Margherita Giuzio, 2017. "Genetic algorithm versus classical methods in sparse index tracking," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 40(1), pages 243-256, November.
    13. Chang, Jinyuan & Chen, Song Xi & Chen, Xiaohong, 2015. "High dimensional generalized empirical likelihood for moment restrictions with dependent data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 283-304.
    14. Xu, Yang & Zhao, Shishun & Hu, Tao & Sun, Jianguo, 2021. "Variable selection for generalized odds rate mixture cure models with interval-censored failure time data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    15. Delbianco Fernando & Tohmé Fernando, 2023. "What is a relevant control?: An algorithmic proposal," Asociación Argentina de Economía Política: Working Papers 4643, Asociación Argentina de Economía Política.
    16. Alexandre Belloni & Victor Chernozhukov & Denis Chetverikov & Christian Hansen & Kengo Kato, 2018. "High-dimensional econometrics and regularized GMM," CeMMAP working papers CWP35/18, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    17. Emmanouil Androulakis & Christos Koukouvinos & Kalliopi Mylona & Filia Vonta, 2010. "A real survival analysis application via variable selection methods for Cox's proportional hazards model," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(8), pages 1399-1406.
    18. Meng An & Haixiang Zhang, 2023. "High-Dimensional Mediation Analysis for Time-to-Event Outcomes with Additive Hazards Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-11, December.
    19. Singh, Rakhi & Stufken, John, 2024. "Factor selection in screening experiments by aggregation over random models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    20. Hao Wang & Hao Zeng & Jiashan Wang, 2022. "An extrapolated iteratively reweighted $$\ell _1$$ ℓ 1 method with complexity analysis," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 83(3), pages 967-997, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:istatr:v:88:y:2020:i:2:p:380-395. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isiiinl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.