IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v41y2023i1ne12631.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Growth, innovation, and policy for chicken in Latin America 1961–2019

Author

Listed:
  • Gregory J. Scott
  • Enrique Vigo

Abstract

Motivation Latin America has witnessed massive increases in production and consumption of chicken meat over the last 60 years and well beyond its share of the developing world's population. Chicken is now a major source of livestock protein in regional diets; leads livestock production in 25 out of the region's 33 countries; production, slaughtering, and sales provide millions of jobs. Purpose To analyse growth rates for chicken meat in Latin America, why they have differed, how the role of innovation and development policies contributed to bringing about this growth, in turn leading to the patterns of governance of these activities today. Methods and approach This study used a modified value chain framework along with FAO statistics, national data, published and unpublished studies to analyse macro‐level developments and their linkages to shifts in the organization of activities in the value chain for chicken from pre‐production through to consumption and trade from past to present. Findings Different natural resource endowments, demographics, and dietary preferences combined with frequent innovations and an array of policy measures led to a spectacular surge in output and productivity, lower costs, and facilitated a steady rise in consumption. As part of that growth, these activities became increasingly concentrated in Brazil, Mexico, and Peru and within those countries in a few very large firms. Their operations expanded in the value chain beyond the farm gate, across the region, and in some cases around the world. Policy implications This paper has implications for greater transparency in grower contracts, better working conditions for slaughterhouse workers and bird catchers, more environmentally and bird‐friendly chicken production, accelerated adoption of practices as per Principles for Responsible Investment in Agriculture and Food Systems in the value chain for broilers in Latin America and the Caribbean, and improved enforcement of laws and regulations governing the technical and financial operations of value chains for chicken, along with renewed collaboration among government authorities to that effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Gregory J. Scott & Enrique Vigo, 2023. "Growth, innovation, and policy for chicken in Latin America 1961–2019," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(1), January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:41:y:2023:i:1:n:e12631
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12631
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.12631?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francisco Martinez-Gomez & Gilberto Aboites-Manrique & Douglas Constance, 2013. "Neoliberal restructuring, neoregulation, and the Mexican poultry industry," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 30(4), pages 495-510, December.
    2. Graham, Douglas H & Gauthier, Howard & de Barros, Jose Roberto Mendonca, 1987. "Thirty Years of Agricultural Growth in Brazil: Crop Performance, Regional Profile, and Recent Policy Review," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 36(1), pages 1-34, October.
    3. Ureta, Carolina & González, Edgar J. & Espinosa, Alejandro & Trueba, Alejandro & Piñeyro-Nelson, Alma & Álvarez-Buylla, Elena R., 2020. "Maize yield in Mexico under climate change," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    4. Unveren, Hakan & Luckstead, Jeff, 2020. "Comprehensive Broiler Supply Chain Model with Vertical and Horizontal Linkages: Impact of US–China Trade War and USMCA," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(3), pages 368-384, August.
    5. Valdes, Constanza & Hallahan, Charlie & Harvey, David, 2015. "Brazil’s Broiler Industry: Increasing Efficiency and Trade," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(A), pages 1-13, July.
    6. Melissa Schumacher & Pamela Durán-Díaz & Anne Kristiina Kurjenoja & Eduardo Gutiérrez-Juárez & David A. González-Rivas, 2019. "Evolution and Collapse of Ejidos in Mexico—To What Extent Is Communal Land Used for Urban Development?," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-21, October.
    7. Eduardo Assad & Hilton S. Pinto & Andre Nassar & Leila Harfuch & Saulo Freitas & Barbara Farinelli & Mark Lundell & Erick C.M. Fernandes, 2013. "Impacts of Climate Change on Brazilian Agriculture," World Bank Publications - Reports 18740, The World Bank Group.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abel Saldivia-Tejeda & Simon Fonteyne & Taiyu Guan & Nele Verhulst, 2021. "Permanent Bed Width Has Little Effect on Crop Yield under Rainfed and Irrigated Conditions across Central Mexico," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-12, September.
    2. SM Helfand, 2000. "Interest Groups And Economic Policy: Explaining The Pattern Of Protection In The Brazilian Agricultural Sector," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 18(4), pages 462-476, October.
    3. Díaz Baca, Manuel Francisco & Moreno Lerma, Leonardo & Triana Ángel, Natalia & Burkart, Stefan, 2024. "The relationships between land tenure, cattle production, and climate change – A systematic literature review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    4. Giacomo Luca & Petros Sekeris, 2012. "Land inequality and conflict intensity," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 119-135, January.
    5. Andrew Allan & Ali Soltani & Mohammad Hamed Abdi & Melika Zarei, 2022. "Driving Forces behind Land Use and Land Cover Change: A Systematic and Bibliometric Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    6. Konstandinos Mattas & Charalampos Charalampous, 1998. "Assessing development plans performance in a free market state," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 4(1), pages 83-94, February.
    7. repec:ags:aaea22:335852 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Douglas H. Constance & Jin Young Choi & Mary K. Hendrickson, 2023. "The Southern Model Revisited: The Intersection of Race, Ethnicity, Immigration, and Health and Safety in Poultry Processing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-17, September.
    9. Martinez-Bravo, Monica & Ferraz, Claudio & Finan, Frederico, 2020. "Political Power, Elite Control, and Long-Run Development: Evidence from Brazil," CEPR Discussion Papers 14912, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    10. Thiesenhusen, William C. & Melmed-Sanjak, Jolyne, 1989. "Agrarian Change in Brazil and in Three "Representative" States in the 1970s," Staff Papers 200474, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    11. Pamela Durán-Díaz & Adriana Armenta-Ramírez & Anne Kristiina Kurjenoja & Melissa Schumacher, 2020. "Community Development through the Empowerment of Indigenous Women in Cuetzalan Del Progreso, Mexico," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-25, May.
    12. William Ridley & Stephen Devadoss, 2023. "Competition and trade policy in the world cotton market: Implications for US cotton exports," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(5), pages 1365-1387, October.
    13. Mauricio R. Bellon & Alicia Mastretta-Yanes & Alejandro Ponce-Mendoza & Daniel Ortiz-Santa María & Oswaldo Oliveros-Galindo & Hugo Perales & Francisca Acevedo & José Sarukhán, 2021. "Beyond subsistence: the aggregate contribution of campesinos to the supply and conservation of native maize across Mexico," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 13(1), pages 39-53, February.
    14. Bacha, C. & Carvalho, L., 2018. "The Evolution of Brazilian Production and Exportation of Agro-based Products from 1990 thru 2013," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277740, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Steven M. Helfand & Gervásio Castro de Rezende, 2004. "The Impact of Sector‐Specific and Economy‐Wide Policy Reforms on the Agricultural Sector in Brazil: 1980–98," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 22(2), pages 194-212, April.
    16. Yazdekhasti, Amin & Wang, Jun & Zhang, Li & Ma, Junfeng, 2021. "A multi-period multi-modal stochastic supply chain model under COVID pandemic: A poultry industry case study in Mississippi," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    17. Jacquelyn Chase, 2003. "Regional prestige: Cooperatives and agroindustrial identity in southwest Goiás, Brazil," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 20(1), pages 37-51, March.
    18. Victor Hugo Flores-Armillas & Xavier López-Medellín & Raúl García Barrios & Ian MacGregor-Fors & David Valenzuela-Galván, 2020. "Landscape Features Associated with Damage to Maize ( Zea mays ) Fields in Central México: A Comparison of Wind and Wildlife Damage," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
    19. Eduardo Gutiérrez Juárez & Anne Kristiina Kurjenoja & Melissa Schumacher & María Guizar Villalvazo & Edwin Gonzalez Meza & Pamela Durán-Díaz, 2022. "Neoliberal Urban Development vs. Rural Communities: Land Management Challenges in San Andrés Cholula, Mexico," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, July.
    20. Li, Na & Li, Yi & Yang, Qiliang & Biswas, Asim & Dong, Hezhong, 2024. "Simulating climate change impacts on cotton using AquaCrop model in China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    21. Douglas H. Constance, 2023. "The doctors of agrifood studies," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(1), pages 31-43, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:41:y:2023:i:1:n:e12631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.