IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/canjag/v72y2024i2p167-198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urbanization and adoption of sustainable agricultural practices in the rural‐urban interface of Bangalore, India

Author

Listed:
  • Verena Preusse
  • Nils Nölke
  • Meike Wollni

Abstract

Urban expansion often takes place on the most productive agricultural lands, affecting how the remaining agricultural land is used. Evidence on the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices in urbanizing areas is scarce and mostly based on cross‐sectional data. Cross‐sectional studies, however, cannot reflect the dynamics of urbanization and adoption. We use household panel data from 2017 and 2020 to analyze the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices among peri‐urban farmers in Bangalore, India, a rapidly urbanizing region. We focus on practices for water and erosion management, integrated pest management and soil fertility management, and an integrated package of sustainable practices. Using random effects probit models with the Mundlak approach, we consider various factors besides urbanization, including exposure to weather variability, awareness of climate change, connection with institutional actors, and household and farm characteristics. Results show that urbanization, measured as changes in the percentage of built‐up area, reduces the probability that farmers adopt sustainable agricultural practices. Like prior studies, we find that wealth indicators, market access, knowledge of climate change, and rainfall variability facilitate adoption. However, contact with institutional actors largely reduces farmers’ probability of adoption. Policies should promote the integration of sustainable farming technologies at the institutional level and in information and training programs to achieve sustainable intensification of peri‐urban agriculture. L'expansion urbaine a souvent lieu sur les terres agricoles les plus productives, ce qui affecte la façon dont les terres agricoles restantes sont utilisées. Les preuves de l'adoption de pratiques agricoles durables dans les zones urbanisées sont rares et reposent principalement sur des données transversales. Toutefois, les études transversales ne peuvent pas refléter la dynamique de l'urbanisation et de l'adoption. Nous utilisons des données de panel de ménages de 2017 et 2020 pour analyser l'adoption de pratiques agricoles durables parmi les agriculteurs périurbains de Bangalore, en Inde, une région à urbanisation rapide. Nous nous concentrons sur les pratiques de gestion de l'eau et de l’érosion, la lutte intégrée contre les ravageurs et la gestion de la fertilité des sols, ainsi que sur un ensemble intégré de pratiques durables. En utilisant des modèles probit à effets aléatoires avec l'approche Mundlak, nous prenons en compte divers facteurs autres que l'urbanisation, notamment l'exposition à la variabilité météorologique, la conscience du changement climatique, les liens avec les acteurs institutionnels et les caractéristiques des ménages et des exploitations agricoles. Les résultats montrent que l'urbanisation, mesurée par les changements dans le pourcentage de zone bâtie, réduit la probabilité que les agriculteurs adoptent des pratiques agricoles durables. À l'instar d’études antérieures, nous constatons que les indicateurs de richesse, l'accès aux marchés, la connaissance du changement climatique et la variabilité des précipitations facilitent l'adoption. Cependant, le contact avec les acteurs institutionnels réduit largement la probabilité d'adoption par les agriculteurs. Les politiques devraient promouvoir l'intégration de technologies agricoles durables au niveau institutionnel et dans les programmes d'information et de formation pour parvenir à une intensification durable de l'agriculture périurbaine.

Suggested Citation

  • Verena Preusse & Nils Nölke & Meike Wollni, 2024. "Urbanization and adoption of sustainable agricultural practices in the rural‐urban interface of Bangalore, India," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 72(2), pages 167-198, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:canjag:v:72:y:2024:i:2:p:167-198
    DOI: 10.1111/cjag.12355
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12355
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/cjag.12355?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Subir Bairagi & Samarendu Mohanty & Sampriti Baruah & Huong Trinh Thi, 2020. "Changing food consumption patterns in rural and urban Vietnam: Implications for a future food supply system," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(3), pages 750-775, July.
    2. Tambo, Justice A. & Mockshell, Jonathan, 2018. "Differential Impacts of Conservation Agriculture Technology Options on Household Income in Sub-Saharan Africa," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 95-105.
    3. Robert, Marion & Thomas, Alban & Sekhar, Muddu & Badiger, Shrinivas & Ruiz, Laurent & Raynal, Hélène & Bergez, Jacques-Eric, 2017. "Adaptive and dynamic decision-making processes: A conceptual model of production systems on Indian farms," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 279-291.
    4. Haggblade, Steven & Hazell, Peter & Reardon, Thomas, 2010. "The Rural Non-farm Economy: Prospects for Growth and Poverty Reduction," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 1429-1441, October.
    5. David Blakeslee & Ram Fishman & Veena Srinivasan, 2020. "Way Down in the Hole: Adaptation to Long-Term Water Loss in Rural India," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(1), pages 200-224, January.
    6. Tambo, J. & Mockshell, J., 2018. "Differential impacts of conservation agriculture technology options on household welfare in sub-Saharan Africa," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277035, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Cazzuffi, Chiara & McKay, Andy & Perge, Emilie, 2020. "The impact of agricultural commercialisation on household welfare in rural Vietnam," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    8. Vagneron, Isabelle, 2007. "Economic appraisal of profitability and sustainability of peri-urban agriculture in Bangkok," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2-3), pages 516-529, March.
    9. Joachim Vandercasteelen & Bart Minten & Seneshaw Tamru, 2021. "Urban proximity, access to value chains, and dairy productivity in Ethiopia," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(4), pages 665-678, July.
    10. Negi, Digvijay S. & Birthal, Pratap S. & Roy, Devesh & Khan, Md. Tajuddin, 2018. "Farmers’ choice of market channels and producer prices in India: Role of transportation and communication networks," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 106-121.
    11. Graeme S. Cumming & Andreas Buerkert & Ellen M. Hoffmann & Eva Schlecht & Stephan von Cramon-Taubadel & Teja Tscharntke, 2014. "Implications of agricultural transitions and urbanization for ecosystem services," Nature, Nature, vol. 515(7525), pages 50-57, November.
    12. Jeffrey M Wooldridge, 2010. "Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262232588, April.
    13. Purushothaman, Seema & Patil, Sheetal & Patil, Iswar & Francis, Ierene & Nesheim, Ingrid, 2013. "Research Note: Policy and Governance for Sustaining Livelihoods and Natural Resources in Small Farms - A Case Study in Karnataka," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 68(2), pages 1-18.
    14. Nagaraj, N. & Chandrakanth, Mysore G. & Chengappa, P.G. & Roopa, H.S. & Chandakavate, Pramod M., 2008. "Contract farming and its implications for input-supply, linkages between markets and farmers in Karnataka," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 21(Conferenc).
    15. Guillermo Montt & Trang Luu, 2020. "Does Conservation Agriculture Change Labour Requirements? Evidence of Sustainable Intensification in Sub‐Saharan Africa," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(2), pages 556-580, June.
    16. Priscilla Wainaina & Songporne Tongruksawattana & Matin Qaim, 2016. "Tradeoffs and complementarities in the adoption of improved seeds, fertilizer, and natural resource management technologies in Kenya," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 47(3), pages 351-362, May.
    17. Pham, Huong-Giang & Chuah, Swee-Hoon & Feeny, Simon, 2021. "Factors affecting the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices: Findings from panel data for Vietnam," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    18. David R. Lee, 2005. "Agricultural Sustainability and Technology Adoption: Issues and Policies for Developing Countries," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 87(5), pages 1325-1334.
    19. Florian Zabel & Ruth Delzeit & Julia M. Schneider & Ralf Seppelt & Wolfram Mauser & Tomáš Václavík, 2019. "Global impacts of future cropland expansion and intensification on agricultural markets and biodiversity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    20. Knowler, Duncan & Bradshaw, Ben, 2007. "Farmers' adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 25-48, February.
    21. Makaiko G. Khonje & Julius Manda & Petros Mkandawire & Adane Hirpa Tufa & Arega D. Alene, 2018. "Adoption and welfare impacts of multiple agricultural technologies: evidence from eastern Zambia," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(5), pages 599-609, September.
    22. Hailemariam Teklewold & Menale Kassie & Bekele Shiferaw, 2013. "Adoption of Multiple Sustainable Agricultural Practices in Rural Ethiopia," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(3), pages 597-623, September.
    23. Richard Damania & Claudia Berg & Jason Russ & A. Federico Barra & John Nash & Rubaba Ali, 2017. "Agricultural Technology Choice and Transport," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 99(1), pages 265-284.
    24. Bart Minten & Bethlehem Koru & David Stifel, 2013. "The last mile(s) in modern input distribution: Pricing, profitability, and adoption," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 44(6), pages 629-646, November.
    25. Poulton, Colin & Dorward, Andrew & Kydd, Jonathan, 2010. "The Future of Small Farms: New Directions for Services, Institutions, and Intermediation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 1413-1428, October.
    26. Bairagi, Subir & Mohanty, Samarendu & Baruah, Sampriti & Trinh Thi, Huong, 2020. "Changing food consumption patterns in rural and urban Vietnam: Implications for a future food supply system," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(3), July.
    27. Teklewold, Hailemariam & Kassie, Menale & Shiferaw, Bekele & Köhlin, Gunnar, 2013. "Cropping system diversification, conservation tillage and modern seed adoption in Ethiopia: Impacts on household income, agrochemical use and demand for labor," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 85-93.
    28. Hans P. Binswanger & Sudhir K. Singh, 2018. "Wages, Prices and Agriculture: How Can Indian Agriculture Cope with Rising Wages?," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(2), pages 281-305, June.
    29. M.R. Narayana, 2011. "Globalization and Urban Economic Growth: Evidence for Bangalore, India," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(6), pages 1284-1301, November.
    30. Berdegué, Julio A. & Carriazo, Fernando & Jara, Benjamín & Modrego, Félix & Soloaga, Isidro, 2015. "Cities, Territories, and Inclusive Growth: Unraveling Urban–Rural Linkages in Chile, Colombia, and Mexico," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 56-71.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Preusse, Verena & Wollni, Meike, 2021. "Adoption of Sustainable Agricultural Practices in the Context of Urbanisation and Environmental Stress – Evidence from Farmers in the Rural-Urban Interface of Bangalore, India," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315159, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Marenya, Paswel P. & Gebremariam, Gebrelibanos & Jaleta, Moti & Rahut, Dil B., 2020. "Sustainable intensification among smallholder maize farmers in Ethiopia: Adoption and impacts under rainfall and unobserved heterogeneity," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    3. Wondimagegn Tesfaye & Garrick Blalock & Nyasha Tirivayi, 2021. "Climate‐Smart Innovations and Rural Poverty in Ethiopia: Exploring Impacts and Pathways," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(3), pages 878-899, May.
    4. Wilckyster Nyateko Nyarindo & Amin Mugera & Atakelty Hailu & Gideon Aiko Obare, 2024. "Do combined sustainable agricultural intensification practices improve smallholder farmers welfare? Evidence from eastern and western Kenya," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 55(2), pages 296-312, March.
    5. Ali M. Oumer & Michael Burton & Atakelty Hailu & Amin Mugera, 2020. "Sustainable agricultural intensification practices and cost efficiency in smallholder maize farms: Evidence from Ethiopia," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(6), pages 841-856, November.
    6. Virna Estefania Moran-Rodas & Verena Preusse & Christine Wachendorf, 2022. "Agricultural Management Practices and Decision-Making in View of Soil Organic Matter in the Urbanizing Region of Bangalore," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-27, May.
    7. Khushbu Mishra & Abdoul G. Sam & Gracious M. Diiro & Mario J. Miranda, 2020. "Gender and the dynamics of technology adoption: Empirical evidence from a household‐level panel data," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(6), pages 857-870, November.
    8. Martey, Edward & Etwire, Prince Maxwell & Abdoulaye, Tahirou, 2020. "Welfare impacts of climate-smart agriculture in Ghana: Does row planting and drought-tolerant maize varieties matter?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    9. Hörner, Denise & Wollni, Meike, 2021. "Integrated soil fertility management and household welfare in Ethiopia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    10. Oumer, Ali M. & Burton, Michael, 2018. "Drivers and Synergies in the Adoption of Sustainable Agricultural Intensification Practices: A Dynamic Perspective," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 273871, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    11. Ruzzante, Sacha & Labarta, Ricardo & Bilton, Amy, 2021. "Adoption of agricultural technology in the developing world: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    12. Eleni Yitbarek & Wondimagegn Tesfaye, 2022. "Climate-Smart Agriculture, Non-Farm Employment and Welfare: Exploring Impacts and Options for Scaling Up," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, November.
    13. Banchayehu Tessema Assefa & Jordan Chamberlin & Martin K. van Ittersum & Pytrik Reidsma, 2021. "Usage and Impacts of Technologies and Management Practices in Ethiopian Smallholder Maize Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, September.
    14. Theriault, Veronique & Smale, Melinda & Haider, Hamza, 2016. "Gender Differences in the Adoption of Cereal Intensification Strategy Sets in Burkina Faso," Food Security International Development Working Papers 245896, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    15. Teklewold, Hailemariam & Mekonnen, Alemu, 2017. "The Tilling of Land in a Changing Climate: Panel Data Evidence from the Nile Basin of Ethiopia," EfD Discussion Paper 17-3, Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg.
    16. Kazushi Takahashi & Rie Muraoka & Keijiro Otsuka, 2020. "Technology adoption, impact, and extension in developing countries’ agriculture: A review of the recent literature," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(1), pages 31-45, January.
    17. Oyetunde-Usman, Zainab & Shee, Apurba & Abdoulaye, Tahirou, 2021. "Does Simultaneous Adoption of Drought Tolerant Maize Varieties and Organic Manure Impact Productivity and Welfare Outcomes of Farm-households in Nigeria?," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 313954, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Zhu, Zhen & Zhou, Jun & Li, Bowei & Shen, Yueqin & Zhang, Yaoqi, 2020. "How feminization of forest management drives households' adoption of technologies: Evidence from non-timber forest products operations in China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    19. Abdul-Hanan Abdallah & Awal Abdul-Rahaman & Gazali Issahaku, 2021. "Sustainable agricultural practices, farm income and food security among rural households in Africa," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(12), pages 17668-17701, December.
    20. Olson, David W. & Mason, Nicole M., 2017. "Maize Marketing Boards and Sustainable Intensification: Panel Survey Evidence from Kenya," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258093, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:canjag:v:72:y:2024:i:2:p:167-198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caefmea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.