IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jafrec/v25y2016i5p637-669..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agricultural Technology Adoption under Climate Change in the Sahel: Micro-evidence from Niger

Author

Listed:
  • Solomon Asfaw
  • Federica Di Battista
  • Leslie Lipper

Abstract

In this article, we assess the determinants of adoption of agricultural technologies under climate risk and evaluate their impact on food security using data from Niger, together with a set of novel weather variation indicators. We employ multivariate probit and instrumental variable techniques to model adoption decisions and their impact. We find that the adoption of both modern inputs (inorganic fertiliser and improved seed) and organic fertiliser is positively associated with crop productivity and crop income. The use of crop residues does not seem to correlate positively with crop productivity and could even have a negative effect. We find a strong negative association on crop productivity among households reporting that they had experienced a delayed onset of the rainy season. We also find that factors driving modern input use are different from those of crop residues and organic fertiliser. While the latter can be characterised as low-investment capital requirements, more labour requirements and longer times for results, the former includes higher investment capital requirements, fewer labour requirements and shorter times for returns. Furthermore, we find that weather variability is one of the strongest determinants of the type of practice adopted. In regions with greater rainfall and temperature variability, crop residue incorporation into soils is more widely adopted. The probability of using modern inputs and organic fertiliser is negatively and strongly correlated with variability in rainfall and temperature. Households with higher levels of wealth, education and labour are most likely to adopt modern inputs. Distance to the nearest market and extension service also plays a strong role in adoption; the greater the distance, the less likely they are to use modern inputs. The converse holds true for organic fertiliser use: the greater distance the farm household is from the market and the extension centre, the more likely it is to use organic fertiliser.

Suggested Citation

  • Solomon Asfaw & Federica Di Battista & Leslie Lipper, 2016. "Agricultural Technology Adoption under Climate Change in the Sahel: Micro-evidence from Niger," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 25(5), pages 637-669.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jafrec:v:25:y:2016:i:5:p:637-669.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jae/ejw005
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    weather variability; adaptation; food security; multivariate probit; instrumental variable; Niger; Africa;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
    • Q16 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - R&D; Agricultural Technology; Biofuels; Agricultural Extension Services
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jafrec:v:25:y:2016:i:5:p:637-669.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csaoxuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.