IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aerrae/47880.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contract farming and its implications for input-supply, linkages between markets and farmers in Karnataka

Author

Listed:
  • Nagaraj, N.
  • Chandrakanth, Mysore G.
  • Chengappa, P.G.
  • Roopa, H.S.
  • Chandakavate, Pramod M.

Abstract

This study is focused on the economic analysis of contract farming with a comparison of income, access to technology and credit of contract and non-contract farmers. The advantages of contract farming for smallholders have also been evaluated. In contract farming, quality inputs such as seeds, fertilizers and plant protection chemicals are provided to the farmers at their farm gate, coupled with the technical advice on production aspects. This not only reduces the working capital needs of farmers but also substantially reduces their transaction cost per unit of output. Borrowing of crop loans has been found 33 per cent higher by non-contract farmers than contract farmers, as the former have to buy material inputs. The net returns have been found higher for contract than non-contract farmers. Within contract farming, net returns have been recorded higher under domestic than foreign contracts for both baby corn and chilli. In the case of non-contract farmers, the net returns (Rs 3,035) have been found less than one-third of domestic contract farmers (Rs 10,610) and slightly more than one-third of foreign contract farmers (Rs 8,050). In the case of chilli also, the net returns realized per acre have been recorded maximum under domestic contract farmers, followed by foreign contract farmers and non-contract farmers. The returns per rupee invested have been noted higher in farming of baby corn in all the three categories than those of chilli farming. The constraints identified in the study include delay in payment and delivery of inputs, delay in lifting the produce, access to seeds, manupulation of grades by the buyers, and high cost of inputs in contract farming. Factors inducing farmers into contract are: low initial investment, better price for the produce, access to market, technical support on package of practices, access to inputs and easy transportation facilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Nagaraj, N. & Chandrakanth, Mysore G. & Chengappa, P.G. & Roopa, H.S. & Chandakavate, Pramod M., 2008. "Contract farming and its implications for input-supply, linkages between markets and farmers in Karnataka," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 21(Conferenc).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aerrae:47880
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.47880
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/47880/files/1-N-Nagaraj.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.47880?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Asokan, S.R. & Singh, Gurdev, 2003. "Role and Constraints of Contract Farming in Agro-Processing Industry," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 58(3), September.
    2. Dileep, B.K. & Grover, R.K. & Rai, K.N., 2002. "Contract Farming in Tomato: An Economic Analysis," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 57(2), June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Verena Preusse & Nils Nölke & Meike Wollni, 2024. "Urbanization and adoption of sustainable agricultural practices in the rural‐urban interface of Bangalore, India," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 72(2), pages 167-198, June.
    2. Schipmann, Christin & Qaim, Matin, 2011. "Supply chain differentiation, contract agriculture, and farmers’ marketing preferences: the case of sweet pepper in Thailand," GlobalFood Discussion Papers 108349, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, GlobalFood, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development.
    3. Vamsidhar Reddy, T.S. & Hall, Andy & Sulaiman V., Rasheed, 2010. "New Organisational and Institutional Vehicles for Managing Innovation in South Asia: Opportunities for Using Research for Technical Change and Social Gain," MERIT Working Papers 2010-054, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    4. N Harish, 2019. "Cost and Benefit Analysis of Contract Farming," Shanlax International Journal of Economics, Shanlax Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 37-46, December.
    5. Thomas Kopp & Ashok K. Mishra, 2022. "Perishability and market power in Nepalese food crop production," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 518-540, June.
    6. Ebata, Ayako & Velasco, Pamela & von Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan, 2015. "Distance to market and farm-gate prices of staple beans in rural Nicaragua," GlobalFood Discussion Papers 197540, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, GlobalFood, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development.
    7. Kumar, A. & Mishra, A. & Joshi, P. & D'Souza, A., 2018. "Impact of Contract Farming and Risk Preference on Food Security: The Case of Organic Basmati Rice Smallholders," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277008, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Schipmann, Christin & Qaim, Matin, 2011. "Supply chain differentiation, contract agriculture, and farmers’ marketing preferences: The case of sweet pepper in Thailand," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 667-677.
    9. Yiming Zhang & Rui Yang & Kai Zhao & Xiangzhi Kong, 2023. "Fertilizer Application in Contract Farming: A Risk Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, July.
    10. Mishra, Ashok K. & Kumar, Anjani & Joshi, Pramod K. & D'Souza, Alwin & Tripathi, Gaurav, 2018. "How can organic rice be a boon to smallholders? Evidence from contract farming in India," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 147-157.
    11. repec:oup:apecpp:v:40:y:2018:i:3:p:353-378. is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Tripathi, G. & Kumar, A. & Roy, D. & Joshi, P., 2018. "Profits from participation in contract farming: Evidence from cultivators of onion, okra and pomegranate in Maharashtra, India," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277106, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Daisy Delsile Dlamini & Jethro Zuwarimwe & Joseph Francis & Godwin R. A. Mchau, 2022. "Risk Factor Assessment of the Smallholder Baby Vegetable Production in Eswatini," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-11, April.
    14. Ebata, Ayako & Hüttel, Silke, 2015. "Do development projects link smallholders to markets?," GlobalFood Discussion Papers 204326, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, GlobalFood, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Swagato Sarkar, 2014. "Contract Farming and McKinsey’s Plan for Transforming Agriculture into Agribusiness in West Bengal," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 9(3), pages 235-251, December.
    2. Pandit, Arun & Pandey, N.K. & Rana, Rajesh K. & Lal, Barsati, 2009. "An Empirical Study of Gains from Potato Contract Farming," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 64(3), pages 1-12.
    3. Bharat Ramaswami & Shamika Ravi & S.D. Chopra, 2003. "Risk management in agriculture," Discussion Papers 03-08, Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi.
    4. Kumar, Jagdish & Kumar K., Prakash, 2008. "Contract Farming: Problems, Prospects and its Effect on Income and Employment," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 21(2).
    5. Zuomiao Xie & Shiqi Yuan & Jinjing Zhu & Weiming Li, 2023. "Contract farming led by a seed enterprise and incentives to produce high quality: Which contract design performs best?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 1173-1198, October.
    6. Motkuri, Venkatanarayana & Veslawatha, Suresh Naik, 2005. "On the Implications of Contract Farming on Agricultural and Rural Development in India : With Special Reference to Karanataka, India," MPRA Paper 48443, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Benmehaia, Amine Mohamed & Brabez, Fatima & Benharrath, Oualid, 2017. "Production Contract Performance In Tomato Processing Industry: Analysis Of Algerian Case," International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics and Finance, vol. 5(2), April.
    8. BEHERA, Deepak Kumar & SWAIN, Braja Bandhu, 2021. "Coperative-Led Contract Farming On Farm Productivity In India," Applied Econometrics and International Development, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 21(1), pages 49-58.
    9. Sandhyarani Patlolla & Rachael E. Goodhue & Richard J. Sexton, 2015. "Managing Quantity, Quality, and Timing in Indian Cane Sugar Production: Ex Post Marketing Permits or Ex Ante Production Contracts?," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 29(3), pages 606-630.
    10. Sudha Narayanan, 2012. "The Heterogeneous welfare impacts of participation in contract farming schemes: Evidence from Southern India," Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers 2012-019, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.
    11. Bellemare, Marc F. & Bloem, Jeffrey R., 2018. "Does contract farming improve welfare? A review," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 259-271.
    12. Thomas Kopp & Ashok K. Mishra, 2022. "Perishability and market power in Nepalese food crop production," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 518-540, June.
    13. Mishra, Ashok K. & Kumar, Anjani & Joshi, Pramod K. & D'Souza, Alwin & Tripathi, Gaurav, 2018. "How can organic rice be a boon to smallholders? Evidence from contract farming in India," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 147-157.
    14. repec:oup:apecpp:v:40:y:2018:i:3:p:353-378. is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Swain, B.B., 2016. "Does Technological Linkage in Contract Farming Increase Farm Productivity and Efficiency? The Case of Hybrid Paddy Seed Cultivation in Undivided Andhra Pradesh," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 29(2).
    16. Khan, Muhammad Fawad & Nakano, Yuko & Kurosaki, Takashi, 2019. "Impact of contract farming on land productivity and income of maize and potato growers in Pakistan," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 28-39.
    17. Kumar, A. & Mishra, A. & Joshi, P. & D'Souza, A., 2018. "Impact of Contract Farming and Risk Preference on Food Security: The Case of Organic Basmati Rice Smallholders," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277008, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Frasa, Stefanie & Carlberg, Jared & Hogan, Robert, 2015. "Use of Contracts by Prairie Agricultural Producers," Working Papers 232328, Structure and Performance of Agriculture and Agri-products Industry (SPAA).
    19. Ashok K. Mishra & Anjani Kumar & Pramod K. Joshi & Alwin D'Souza, 2018. "Impact of contract farming on yield, costs and profitability in low‐value crop: evidence from a low‐income country," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 62(4), pages 589-607, October.
    20. Sukhpal Singh, 2007. "Corporate Farming in India:Is it Must for Agricultural Development?," Working Papers id:871, eSocialSciences.
    21. Narayanan, Sudha, 2014. "Profits from participation in high value agriculture: Evidence of heterogeneous benefits in contract farming schemes in Southern India," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 142-157.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Farm Management;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aerrae:47880. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeraiea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.