IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v79y2023i4p3895-3906.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constructing time‐invariant dynamic surveillance rules for optimal monitoring schedules

Author

Listed:
  • Xinyuan Dong
  • Yingye Zheng
  • Daniel W. Lin
  • Lisa Newcomb
  • Ying‐Qi Zhao

Abstract

Dynamic surveillance rules (DSRs) are sequential surveillance decision rules informing monitoring schedules in clinical practice, which can adapt over time according to a patient's evolving characteristics. In many clinical applications, it is desirable to identify and implement optimal time‐invariant DSRs, where the parameters indexing the decision rules are shared across different decision points. We propose a new criterion for DSRs that accounts for benefit‐cost tradeoff during the course of disease surveillance. We develop two methods to estimate the time‐invariant DSRs optimizing the proposed criterion, and establish asymptotic properties for the estimated parameters of biomarkers indexing the DSRs. The first approach estimates the optimal decision rules for each individual at every stage via regression modeling, and then estimates the time‐invariant DSRs via a classification procedure with the estimated time‐varying decision rules as the response. The second approach proceeds by optimizing a relaxation of the empirical objective, where a surrogate function is utilized to facilitate computation. Extensive simulation studies are conducted to demonstrate the superior performances of the proposed methods. The methods are further applied to the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study (PASS).

Suggested Citation

  • Xinyuan Dong & Yingye Zheng & Daniel W. Lin & Lisa Newcomb & Ying‐Qi Zhao, 2023. "Constructing time‐invariant dynamic surveillance rules for optimal monitoring schedules," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3895-3906, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:79:y:2023:i:4:p:3895-3906
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.13911
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13911
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.13911?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lixing Zhu & Liugen Xue, 2006. "Empirical likelihood confidence regions in a partially linear single‐index model," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 68(3), pages 549-570, June.
    2. Tracey L. Marsh & Holly Janes & Margaret S. Pepe, 2020. "Statistical inference for net benefit measures in biomarker validation studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(3), pages 843-852, September.
    3. Cain Lauren E. & Robins James M. & Lanoy Emilie & Logan Roger & Costagliola Dominique & Hernán Miguel A., 2010. "When to Start Treatment? A Systematic Approach to the Comparison of Dynamic Regimes Using Observational Data," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 1-26, April.
    4. Bibhas Chakraborty & Palash Ghosh & Erica E. M. Moodie & A. John Rush, 2016. "Estimating optimal shared-parameter dynamic regimens with application to a multistage depression clinical trial," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 72(3), pages 865-876, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jianhong Shi & Qian Yang & Xiongya Li & Weixing Song, 2017. "Effects of measurement error on a class of single-index varying coefficient regression models," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 977-1001, September.
    2. Jelena Bradic & Weijie Ji & Yuqian Zhang, 2021. "High-dimensional Inference for Dynamic Treatment Effects," Papers 2110.04924, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    3. Liugen Xue, 2010. "Empirical Likelihood Local Polynomial Regression Analysis of Clustered Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 37(4), pages 644-663, December.
    4. Huang, Zhensheng & Pang, Zhen & Zhang, Riquan, 2013. "Adaptive profile-empirical-likelihood inferences for generalized single-index models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 70-82.
    5. Lai, Peng & Wang, Qihua, 2014. "Semiparametric efficient estimation for partially linear single-index models with responses missing at random," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 33-50.
    6. Yang, Hu & Guo, Chaohui & Lv, Jing, 2014. "A robust and efficient estimation method for single-index varying-coefficient models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 119-127.
    7. Kangning Wang & Lu Lin, 2017. "Robust and efficient direction identification for groupwise additive multiple-index models and its applications," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 26(1), pages 22-45, March.
    8. Ruidong Han & Xinghui Wang & Shuhe Hu, 2018. "Asymptotics of the weighted least squares estimation for AR(1) processes with applications to confidence intervals," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 27(3), pages 479-490, August.
    9. Hongxia Wang & Zihan Zhao & Hongxia Hao & Chao Huang, 2023. "Estimation and Inference for Spatio-Temporal Single-Index Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-32, October.
    10. Kai Yang & Xue Ding & Xiaohui Yuan, 2022. "Bayesian empirical likelihood inference and order shrinkage for autoregressive models," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 97-121, February.
    11. Wei Yu & Cuizhen Niu & Wangli Xu, 2014. "An empirical likelihood inference for the coefficient difference of a two-sample linear model with missing response data," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 77(5), pages 675-693, July.
    12. Zhensheng Huang, 2011. "Statistical estimation in partially linear single-index models with error-prone linear covariates," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 339-350.
    13. Lai, Peng & Wang, Qihua & Lian, Heng, 2012. "Bias-corrected GEE estimation and smooth-threshold GEE variable selection for single-index models with clustered data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 422-432.
    14. Yukitoshi Matsushita & Taisuke Otsu, 2018. "Likelihood Inference on Semiparametric Models: Average Derivative and Treatment Effect," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 69(2), pages 133-155, June.
    15. Lai, Peng & Li, Gaorong & Lian, Heng, 2013. "Quadratic inference functions for partially linear single-index models with longitudinal data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 115-127.
    16. Hua Liang & Yongsong Qin & Xinyu Zhang & David Ruppert, 2009. "Empirical Likelihood‐Based Inferences for Generalized Partially Linear Models," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 36(3), pages 433-443, September.
    17. Gueuning, Thomas & Claeskens, Gerda, 2016. "Confidence intervals for high-dimensional partially linear single-index models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 13-29.
    18. Liugen Xue, 2009. "Empirical Likelihood Confidence Intervals for Response Mean with Data Missing at Random," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 36(4), pages 671-685, December.
    19. Jianglin Fang & Wanrong Liu & Xuewen Lu, 2018. "Empirical likelihood for heteroscedastic partially linear single-index models with growing dimensional data," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 81(3), pages 255-281, April.
    20. Yunan Wu & Lan Wang, 2021. "Resampling‐based confidence intervals for model‐free robust inference on optimal treatment regimes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(2), pages 465-476, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:79:y:2023:i:4:p:3895-3906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.