IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metrik/v77y2014i5p675-693.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An empirical likelihood inference for the coefficient difference of a two-sample linear model with missing response data

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Yu
  • Cuizhen Niu
  • Wangli Xu

Abstract

In this paper, we use the empirical likelihood method to make inferences for the coefficient difference of a two-sample linear regression model with missing response data. The commonly used empirical likelihood ratio is not concave for this problem, so we append a natural and well-explained condition to the likelihood function and propose three types of restricted empirical likelihood ratios for constructing the confidence region of the parameter in question. It can be demonstrated that all three empirical likelihood ratios have, asymptotically, chi-squared distributions. Simulation studies are carried out to show the effectiveness of the proposed approaches in aspects of coverage probability and interval length. A real data set is analysed with our methods as an example. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Yu & Cuizhen Niu & Wangli Xu, 2014. "An empirical likelihood inference for the coefficient difference of a two-sample linear model with missing response data," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 77(5), pages 675-693, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:metrik:v:77:y:2014:i:5:p:675-693
    DOI: 10.1007/s00184-013-0459-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00184-013-0459-3
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00184-013-0459-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lixing Zhu & Liugen Xue, 2006. "Empirical likelihood confidence regions in a partially linear single‐index model," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 68(3), pages 549-570, June.
    2. Shi, Jian & Lau, Tai-Shing, 2000. "Empirical Likelihood for Partially Linear Models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 132-148, January.
    3. Qihua Wang & J. N. K. Rao, 2002. "Empirical Likelihood‐based Inference in Linear Models with Missing Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 29(3), pages 563-576, September.
    4. Toyoda, Toshihisa, 1974. "Use of the Chow Test under Heteroscedasticity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 42(3), pages 601-608, May.
    5. Xuemin Zi & Changliang Zou & Yukun Liu, 2012. "Two-sample empirical likelihood method for difference between coefficients in linear regression model," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 83-93, February.
    6. Su, Haiyan & Liang, Hua, 2010. "An empirical likelihood-based method for comparison of treatment effects--Test of equality of coefficients in linear models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(4), pages 1079-1088, April.
    7. Xue, Liugen, 2009. "Empirical likelihood for linear models with missing responses," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(7), pages 1353-1366, August.
    8. Wangli Xu & Xu Guo & Lixing Zhu, 2012. "Goodness-of-fitting for partial linear model with missing response at random," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 103-118.
    9. Stute, Winfried & Xue, Liugen & Zhu, Lixing, 2007. "Empirical Likelihood Inference in Nonlinear Errors-in-Covariables Models With Validation Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 102, pages 332-346, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gabriela Ciuperca & Zahraa Salloum, 2015. "Empirical likelihood test in a posteriori change-point nonlinear model," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 78(8), pages 919-952, November.
    2. Yu-Ye Zou & Han-Ying Liang & Jing-Jing Zhang, 2015. "Nonlinear wavelet density estimation with data missing at random when covariates are present," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 78(8), pages 967-995, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Yiping & Li, Gaorong & Peng, Heng, 2014. "Empirical likelihood of varying coefficient errors-in-variables models with longitudinal data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 1-18.
    2. Ruidong Han & Xinghui Wang & Shuhe Hu, 2018. "Asymptotics of the weighted least squares estimation for AR(1) processes with applications to confidence intervals," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 27(3), pages 479-490, August.
    3. Jianglin Fang & Wanrong Liu & Xuewen Lu, 2018. "Empirical likelihood for heteroscedastic partially linear single-index models with growing dimensional data," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 81(3), pages 255-281, April.
    4. Zhao, Yichuan & Chen, Feiming, 2008. "Empirical likelihood inference for censored median regression model via nonparametric kernel estimation," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 215-231, February.
    5. Xue, Liugen, 2009. "Empirical likelihood for linear models with missing responses," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(7), pages 1353-1366, August.
    6. Liugen Xue, 2009. "Empirical Likelihood Confidence Intervals for Response Mean with Data Missing at Random," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 36(4), pages 671-685, December.
    7. Xue, Liugen & Xue, Dong, 2011. "Empirical likelihood for semiparametric regression model with missing response data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(4), pages 723-740, April.
    8. Xue, Liugen & Zhang, Jinghua, 2020. "Empirical likelihood for partially linear single-index models with missing observations," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    9. Wang, Qihua & Lai, Peng, 2011. "Empirical likelihood calibration estimation for the median treatment difference in observational studies," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 1596-1609, April.
    10. Huang, Zhensheng & Pang, Zhen, 2012. "Corrected empirical likelihood inference for right-censored partially linear single-index model," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 276-284.
    11. Xu Guo & Wangli Xu & Lixing Zhu, 2015. "Model checking for parametric regressions with response missing at random," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 67(2), pages 229-259, April.
    12. Bravo, Francesco & Escanciano, Juan Carlos & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2015. "Wilks' Phenomenon in Two-Step Semiparametric Empirical Likelihood Inference," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2015016, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    13. Guo, Donglin & Xue, Liugen & Hu, Yuqin, 2017. "Covariate-balancing-propensity-score-based inference for linear models with missing responses," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 139-145.
    14. Qin, Yongsong & Li, Ling & Lei, Qingzhu, 2009. "Empirical likelihood for linear regression models with missing responses," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(11), pages 1391-1396, June.
    15. Qiang Chen & Lu Lin & Lixing Zhu, 2010. "Bias-corrected smoothed score function for single-index models," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 71(1), pages 45-58, January.
    16. Wangli Xu & Lixing Zhu, 2015. "Nonparametric check for partial linear errors-in-covariables models with validation data," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 67(4), pages 793-815, August.
    17. Liugen Xue, 2010. "Empirical Likelihood Local Polynomial Regression Analysis of Clustered Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 37(4), pages 644-663, December.
    18. Kai Yang & Xue Ding & Xiaohui Yuan, 2022. "Bayesian empirical likelihood inference and order shrinkage for autoregressive models," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 97-121, February.
    19. Lu, Xuewen, 2009. "Empirical likelihood for heteroscedastic partially linear models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(3), pages 387-396, March.
    20. Xiuli Wang & Gaorong Li & Lu Lin, 2011. "Empirical likelihood inference for semi-parametric varying-coefficient partially linear EV models," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 171-185, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metrik:v:77:y:2014:i:5:p:675-693. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.