IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bit/bsrysr/v13y2022i1p66-83n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Categorisation of Open Government Data Literature

Author

Listed:
  • Ferencek Aljaž

    (Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Maribor, Slovenia)

  • Borštnar Mirjana Kljajić

    (Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Maribor, Slovenia)

  • Žagar Ajda Pretnar

    (Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Abstract

Background: Due to the emerging global interest in Open Government Data, research papers on various topics in this area have increased. Objectives: This paper aims to categorise Open government data research. Methods/Approach: A literature review was conducted to provide a complete overview and classification of open government data research. Hierarchical clustering, a cluster analysis method, was used, and a hierarchy of clusters on selected data sets emerged. Results: The results of this study suggest that there are two distinct clusters of research, which either focus on government perspectives and policies on OGD, initiatives, and portals or focus on regional studies, adoption of OGD, platforms, and barriers to implementation. Further findings suggest that research gaps could be segmented into many thematic areas, focusing on success factors, best practices, the impact of open government data, barriers/challenges in implementing open government data, etc. Conclusions: The extension of the paper, which was first presented at the Entrenova conference, provides a comprehensive overview of research to date on the implementation of OGD and points out that this topic has already received research attention, which focuses on specific segments of the phenomenon and signifies in which direction new research should be made.

Suggested Citation

  • Ferencek Aljaž & Borštnar Mirjana Kljajić & Žagar Ajda Pretnar, 2022. "Categorisation of Open Government Data Literature," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 66-83, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bit:bsrysr:v:13:y:2022:i:1:p:66-83:n:6
    DOI: 10.2478/bsrj-2022-0005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2022-0005
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/bsrj-2022-0005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haridimos Tsoukas & Robert Chia, 2002. "On Organizational Becoming: Rethinking Organizational Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(5), pages 567-582, October.
    2. Marčeta Milja & Bojnec Štefan, 2020. "Drivers of Global Competitiveness in the European Union Countries in 2014 and 2017," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 53(1), pages 37-52, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Burt, George & Mackay, David J. & van der Heijden, Kees & Verheijdt, Charlotte, 2017. "Openness disposition: Readiness characteristics that influence participant benefits from scenario planning as strategic conversation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 16-25.
    2. Shahzad Khurram & Sandra Charreire Petit, 2017. "Investigating the Dynamics of Stakeholder Salience: What Happens When the Institutional Change Process Unfolds?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(3), pages 485-515, July.
    3. Gary T. Burke & Carola Wolf, 2021. "The Process Affordances of Strategy Toolmaking when Addressing Wicked Problems," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 359-388, March.
    4. Guiette, Alain & Vandenbempt, Koen, 2017. "Change managerialism and micro-processes of sensemaking during change implementation," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 65-81.
    5. Marina Fiedler & Isabell Welpe & Arnold Picot, 2010. "Understanding Radical Change: An Examination of Management Departments in German-speaking Universities," management revue. Socio-economic Studies, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 21(2), pages 111-134.
    6. Maria Margarida Avillez & Andrew Greenman & Susan Marlow, 2020. "Ethical Judgments About Social Entrepreneurship in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Influence of Spatio-Cultural Meanings," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(4), pages 877-892, February.
    7. Jing Zeng & Yunlu Yang & Soo Hee Lee, 2023. "Resource Orchestration and Scaling‐up of Platform‐Based Entrepreneurial Firms: The Logic of Dialectic Tuning," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 605-638, May.
    8. Mikko Vesa & Frank den Hond & J. Tuomas Harviainen, 2019. "On the Possibility of a Paratelic Initiation of Organizational Wrongdoing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(1), pages 1-15, November.
    9. Risien, Julie, 2019. "Curators and sojourners in learning networks: Practices for transformation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 71-79.
    10. Dean A. Shepherd & Trenton A. Williams, 2023. "Different response paths to organizational resilience," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 23-58, June.
    11. Miozzo, Marcela & DiVito, Lori, 2016. "Growing fast or slow?: Understanding the variety of paths and the speed of early growth of entrepreneurial science-based firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 964-986.
    12. Antonio SANDU, 2017. "Some Considerations on the Social Construction of Multiple Intelligence. Appreciative Intelligence," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 8(2), pages 22-39, September.
    13. Lise Arena & Anthony Hussenot, 2021. "From Innovations at Work to Innovative Ways of Conceptualizing Organization: A Brief History of Organization Studies," Post-Print hal-03290300, HAL.
    14. Beth A. Bechky, 2006. "Gaffers, Gofers, and Grips: Role-Based Coordination in Temporary Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 3-21, February.
    15. Dragos Vieru & Pierre-Emmanuel Arduin, 2016. "Sharing Knowledge in a Shared Services Center Context: An Explanatory Case Study of the Dialectics of Formal and Informal Practices," Post-Print hal-01458031, HAL.
    16. Lorino, Philippe & Mourey, Damien & Schmidt, Géraldine, 2017. "Goffman's theory of frames and situated meaning-making in performance reviews. The case of a category management approach in the French retail sector," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 32-49.
    17. Domagoj Hru?ka, 0000. "Leading with Purpose: Framework for Recontextualizing Organizations Through Metaphors," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 11313240, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    18. Albert Marouani, 2013. "The Management Of Strategic Change In Public Organisations In The Light Of The Experience Of Autonomy Of French Universities: An Attempt At Critical Appraisal [Le management du changement stratégiq," Post-Print hal-02108163, HAL.
    19. Francesco Virili & Cristiano Ghiringhelli, 2021. "Uncertainty and Emerging Tensions in Organizational Change: A Grounded Theory Study on the Orchestrating Role of the Change Leader," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, April.
    20. François-Xavier de Vaujany & Stefan Haefliger & Paula Ungureanu, 2022. "From Collaborative Spaces to New Modes of Organizing: Society, Democracy and Commons on the Way to Novelty [Des espaces collaboratifs aux nouvelles formes d'organisation : société, démocratie et co," Post-Print hal-03827462, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bit:bsrysr:v:13:y:2022:i:1:p:66-83:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.