IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/apb/jabsss/2019p47-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Results Based Management (RBM): An antidote to program management

Author

Listed:
  • Bongs Lainjo

    (Cybermatic International, Montreal, Canada)

Abstract

Results Based Management (RBM) is an important concept in the strategic system approach. It is systematic coalesce of efforts consciously made to achieve a desired result. It is a management approach purely shaped by the results. This study seeks to explore RBM in strategic system approach through the analysis of a life case study. This section discusses the results-based management logical framework and the theory of change. The logical framework of RBM evidently resides on the structured, logical model, which identifies the expected outputs and consequently the inputs as well as activities required to accomplish the outcomes. The logical framework is struc- tured around five items: assess, think, plan, do and review. The philosophical assumptions underlying this study are based on critical realism. This study seeks to establish the mechanisms applied in results-based management and the structures that are required via a life case study of the United Nations Organizations. In critical realism ontology, three aspects are considered, the real, the actual and the empirical. To understand the application of RBM in the case study, this study combines all the three aspects of an insightful analysis. The study draws important lessons in the implementation of results-based management model stemming from the introduction of changes in the RBM framework and the incentives for motivating the management to adopt results-based management. The study notes the existence of RBM on policy papers, but there is the minimal impetus to implement it practically despite its potential benefits in achieving the organizational performance. In occasional cases where the frame- work is implemented, there exists an inadequate degree of inclusivity, participatory and enabling environment. The life case study focused on the United Nation Organization and the modalities for the implementation of RBM. As a critical step in the evolution of logical framework approaches, RBM attempts to respond to some issues of the Project Cycle Management (PCM) and Logical Framework Approach (LFA) methods. People often ask what the difference is between PCM or LFA and Results Based Management. In a sense, RBM is PCM done right. It provides more tools and directives on what should be done to ensure that project design is performed in a participatory way, and to make sure that one takes into consideration any assumptions and risks. In conclusion, this work has explored the concept of results-based management as a management approach that targets at the improving re- sults in a three-thronged model constituted of Short-, medium-, and long-term types of results, outputs, outcomes, and impacts. The concept is particularly prevalent in the public and not-for-profit organizations. The study has focused on getting insight on the results-based approach in program management and its application in a selected case study. The study explored the application of RBM in the United Nations Organizations such as UNESCO, UNDP among others with a focus on the global, regional and country-based implementation of RBM.

Suggested Citation

  • Bongs Lainjo, 2019. "Results Based Management (RBM): An antidote to program management," Journal of Administrative and Business Studies, Professor Dr. Usman Raja, vol. 5(1), pages 47-64.
  • Handle: RePEc:apb:jabsss:2019:p:47-64
    DOI: 10.20474/jabs-5.1.5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://tafpublications.com/platform/Articles/full-jabs5.1.5.php
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://tafpublications.com/gip_content/paper/Jabs-5.1.5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20474/jabs-5.1.5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Layyinaturrobaniyah & Dian Masyita & Gilang Sekartadjie, 2016. "Fundamental and technical analyses for stock investment decision making," Journal of Administrative and Business Studies, Professor Dr. Usman Raja, vol. 2(1), pages 1-7.
    2. Donald F. Kettl, 1997. "The global revolution in public management: Driving themes, missing links," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(3), pages 446-462.
    3. Pollitt, Christopher & Bouckaert, Geert, 2004. "Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780199268498.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Regina Pacheco, 2013. "Arm’s Length Bodies in Brazil: Contradictions and Challenges," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 131-141, June.
    2. Cioclea, Alexandra Ema, 2011. "Critical considerations on defining and measuring performance in public organizations," MPRA Paper 33642, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Asif Mohammad Shahan & Ferdous Jahan & Rizwan Khair, 2021. "A glimpse of light in darkness: Performance‐based accountability in Bangladesh public administration," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(4), pages 191-202, October.
    4. Tamara Guerrero-Gómez & Andrés Navarro-Galera & David Ortiz-Rodríguez, 2021. "Promoting Online Transparency to Help Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals: An Empirical Study of Local Governments in Latin America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Dietrich Budäus & Dennis Hilgers, 2009. "Reform des öffentlichen Haushalts- und Rechnungswesens in Deutschland," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 377-396, January.
    6. Dixon, Keith, 2009. "Calculative practices in higher education: a retrospective analysis of curricular accounting about learning," MPRA Paper 18295, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Kemmerling, Achim & Bruttel, Oliver, 2005. "New politics in German labour market policy? The implications of the recent Hartz reforms for the German welfare state," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Labor Market Policy and Employment SP I 2005-101, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    8. Claudiu CICEA, 2020. "Performance In Public Management. A Research Agenda With Bibliometric Approach," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2020(35), pages 109-123, December.
    9. Budäus, Dietrich, 2009. "Manifest zum öffentlichen Haushalts- und Rechnungswesen in Deutschland – Mehr Transparenz, Effektivität und Effizienz in Politik und Verwaltungen durch ein einheitliches doppisches Haushalts- und Rech," ZögU - Zeitschrift für öffentliche und gemeinwirtschaftliche Unternehmen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 32(3), pages 282-318.
    10. Jari Stenvall & Petri Virtanen, 2017. "Intelligent Public Organisations," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 195-209, June.
    11. Tóth, Balázs, 2021. "Milyen kapcsolatban állnak a közszféra reformjai a gazdaságpolitikai paradigmákkal? [How reforms of the public sector relate to the paradigms of economic policy]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 205-222.
    12. Leroux, Erick & Pupion, Pierre-Charles, 2022. "Smart territories and IoT adoption by local authorities: A question of trust, efficiency, and relationship with the citizen-user-taxpayer," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    13. John Wanna, 2010. "Investigating the Reality of Reform in Modern Budgeting," Chapters, in: John Wanna & Lotte Jensen & Jouke de Vries (ed.), The Reality of Budgetary Reform in OECD Nations, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Cipolletta, Germano & Fiorani, Gloria & Matei, Ani & Matei, Lucica & Meneguzzo, Marco & Mititelu, Cristina, 2010. "Public Sector Modernization Trends of the Member States of European Union.Trajectories of reforms in Italy and Romania," Apas Papers 267, Academic Public Administration Studies Archive - APAS.
    15. repec:aif:journl:v:31:y:2024:i:1:p:64-75 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Naumenko, Raisa, 2016. "Study Of The Current Status Of Training Of Applicants For Higher Education On The Specialty “Public Management And Administration”," EUREKA: Social and Humanities, Scientific Route OÜ, issue 3, pages 21-28.
    17. Bellò, Benedetta & Spano, Alessandro, 2015. "Governing the purple zone: How politicians influence public managers," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 354-365.
    18. Halstead, John M. & Mohr, Robert D. & Deller, Steven C., 2010. "Service Delivery in Rural Municipalities: Privatize, Cooperate, or Go It Alone?," 2010 Annual Meeting, July 25-27, 2010, Denver, Colorado 60991, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Deborah Wilson, 2011. "Comparative Analysis in Public Management," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 293-308, February.
    20. Bryan DUFOUR & Francesca PETRELLA & Nadine RICHEZ-BATTESTI, 2020. "Understanding social impact assessment through public value theory: A comparative analysis on work integration social enterprises (WISEs) in France and Denmark," CIRIEC Working Papers 2012, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    21. Independent Evaluation Group, 2008. "Public Sector Reform: What Works and Why? An IEG evaluation of World Bank Support," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6484.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:apb:jabsss:2019:p:47-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Professor Dr. Usman Raja (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://tafpublications.com/platform/published_papers/9 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.