IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jlofdr/26515.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Affecting Consumer Preferences For Major Food Markets In Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Ho-Shui
  • Houston, Jack E.

Abstract

The Food Industry Research and Development Institute conducted a nationwide survey of food consumption in Taiwan in 1999. A sample of 1200 consumers responded to a questionnaire, which asked whether there was a use/visit experience in the past year for each of six types of food markets: traditional vegetable market, supermarket, hypermarket, consumer cooperative, chain convenience store, and grocery store. Questions also asked which types of food markets consumers used most frequently for the purchase of fresh foods, planned purchases or occasional purchases of processed foods, and what factors influenced consumers to choose their most frequently used market. Nearly 84 percent of surveyed consumers have used/visited traditional vegetable markets in the past year, while 47 percent choose traditional markets as their most frequented marketplace for buying fresh food in Taiwan. Some 81 percent of surveyed consumers have used or visited a supermarket in past year, while 17.7 percent and 29.0 percent choose supermarkets as the most frequented marketplace for planned and occasional purchases of processed foods, respectively. We apply stepwise logistic regression to identify significant sociodemographic factors (such as gender, age, and others) which influence the choice of each of the six major types of food markets and to identify the promotional factors which positively or negatively influence consumers' preferences for the most often used market. Female consumers have almost four times higher odds of frequently using traditional vegetable markets in the past year. The unmarried, divorced/widowed, and/or those who had higher family monthly incomes demonstrate lower odds of frequently using traditional markets. For purchases of fresh foods, female respondents, older consumers, and/or those living in northern Taiwan have higher odds of choosing traditional vegetable markets as the most frequently used market, while occupation "chief," and those with higher levels of education have lower odds of choosing traditional markets. Price level influences consumers positively in choosing traditional vegetable markets, while products with mark registrations, such as GMP or CAS, negatively influence this choice. For planned purchases of processed foods, older consumers are more likely than others to choose traditional vegetable markets, and price level is also a positive influence for choosing these markets. For occasional purchases of processed foods, manual laborers and/or those living in northern Taiwan have higher odds of choosing traditional vegetable markets, while unmarried respondents have lower odds. Price level and products with nutrition labeling are positive promotional factors influencing consumers to choose traditional vegetable markets. For the other five market types, sociodemographic factors influence consumers' choices of markets differently in each case, but marketing factors also influence choices of which type of marketplace to use most frequently.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Ho-Shui & Houston, Jack E., 2001. "Factors Affecting Consumer Preferences For Major Food Markets In Taiwan," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 32(1), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:26515
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.26515
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/26515/files/32010097.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.26515?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodolfo M. Nayga, 1996. "Sociodemographic Influences on Consumer Concern for Food Safety: The Case of Irradiation, Antibiotics, Hormones, and Pesticides," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 18(3), pages 467-475.
    2. Dickerson, Mary Dee & Gentry, James W, 1983. "Characteristics of Adopters and Non-Adopters of Home Computers," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 10(2), pages 225-235, September.
    3. Kastens, Terry L. & Goodwin, Barry K., 1994. "An Analysis of farmers' Policy Attitudes and Preferences for Free Trade," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(2), pages 497-505, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Koji Yasuda & Tomoko Kinugasa & Shigeyuki Hamori, 2019. "An Empirical Analysis Of Marital Status In Japan," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 64(03), pages 773-798, June.
    2. Craig Johns & Pamela Lyon & Randy Stringer & Wendy Umberger, 2017. "Changing urban consumer behaviour and the role of different retail outlets in the food industry of Fiji," Asia-Pacific Development Journal, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), vol. 24(1), pages 117-145, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. K. Sudhir & Ishani Tewari, 2015. "Long Term Effects of Experience During Youth: Evidence From Consumptions in China," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2025R, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, revised Mar 2016.
    2. Pepermans, Roland & Verleye, Gino & Van Cappellen, Sarah, 1996. "'Wallbanking', innovativeness and computer attitudes: 25-40-year-old ATM-users on the spot," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 17(6), pages 731-748, December.
    3. Desmichel, Perrine & Ordabayeva, Nailya & Kocher, Bruno, 2020. "What if diamonds did not last forever? Signaling status achievement through ephemeral versus iconic luxury goods," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 49-65.
    4. Baker, Gregory A., 2003. "Food Safety And Fear: Factors Affecting Consumer Response To Food Safety Risk," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11.
    5. Lokesh Jasrai, 2014. "Measuring Mobile Telecom Service Innovativeness Among Youth," Paradigm, , vol. 18(1), pages 103-116, June.
    6. Leroux, Erick & Pupion, Pierre-Charles, 2022. "Smart territories and IoT adoption by local authorities: A question of trust, efficiency, and relationship with the citizen-user-taxpayer," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    7. Kupeli, Birgul & Salman, Gulberk Gultekin & Karaosmanoglu, Elif & Daim, Tugrul, 2024. "Exploring self-service technology adoption: Case of airline check in," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    8. Mai, Li-Wei & Ness, Mitchell, 1997. "Consumers' Perceptions of Speciality Foods and the Rural Mail Order Business," 52nd Seminar, June 19-21, 1997, Parma, Italy 231416, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Joe Cox, 2011. "The Economics of the Video-gaming Leisure Market," Chapters, in: Samuel Cameron (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of Leisure, chapter 19, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Wolf, Christopher A. & Tonsor, Glynn T., 2012. "Dairy Farmer Preferences for 2012 Farm Bill," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124866, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    11. Abele Kuipers & Agata Malak-Rawlikowska & Aldona Stalgienė & Anita Ule & Marija Klopčič, 2021. "European Dairy Farmers’ Perceptions and Responses towards Development Strategies in Years of Turbulent Market and Policy Changes," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, March.
    12. Chakravarty, Sugato & Dubinsky, Alan, 2005. "Individual investors' reactions to decimalization: Innovation diffusion in financial markets," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 89-103, February.
    13. Lee, Chang Hwan & Rhee, Byong-Duk, 2007. "Channel coordination using product returns for a supply chain with stochastic salvage capacity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 214-238, February.
    14. Bikram Jit Singh Mann & Sunpreet Kaur Sahni, 2012. "Profiling Adopter Categories of Internet Banking in India: An Empirical Study," Vision, , vol. 16(4), pages 283-295, December.
    15. Vellini, Nicolás Andrés & Lupín, Beatriz, 2021. "Aceptación de un sello de calidad hortícola. Una aplicación de tablas de contingencia a tres vías," Nülan. Deposited Documents 3498, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Centro de Documentación.
    16. Barrenar, Ramo & García, Teresa & Camarena, María, 2015. "An Analysis of the Decision Structure for Food Innovation on the Basis of Consumer Age," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(3), pages 1-22, September.
    17. Huh, Young Eun & Kim, Sang-Hoon, 2008. "Do early adopters upgrade early? Role of post-adoption behavior in the purchase of next-generation products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 40-46, January.
    18. Abdolrazagh Madahi & Inda Sukati, 2016. "An Empirical Study of Malaysian Consumers’ Channel-switching Intention: Using theory of Planned Behaviour," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(3), pages 489-523, June.
    19. Arzdar Kiracı, 2015. "The Impact of Innovative New Economy Products on Market Competition: Competition Might Decrease," EY International Congress on Economics II (EYC2015), November 5-6, 2015, Ankara, Turkey 304, Ekonomik Yaklasim Association.
    20. Tellis, Gerard J. & Chandrasekaran, Deepa, 2010. "Extent and impact of response biases in cross-national survey research," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 329-341.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Consumer/Household Economics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:26515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fdrssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.