IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/joaaec/15186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analysis Of Farmers' Policy Attitudes And Preferences For Free Trade

Author

Listed:
  • Kastens, Terry L.
  • Goodwin, Barry K.

Abstract

This study evaluates the attitudes of U.S. (Kansas) farmers regarding "free-trade" and "free-market" policy environments. In contrast to earlier studies, non-specific policy attitudes are evaluated. A direct measure of farm program benefits is also included. Attitudes vary significantly with farm and operator characteristics. Support for free trade was shown to decrease with education and experience, to increase for farms with relatively more rented land, and to increase as total farm wealth increased. Support for free-trade was also higher for crop farms. Farms receiving more government payments are less likely to favor a free-trade policy environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Kastens, Terry L. & Goodwin, Barry K., 1994. "An Analysis Of Farmers' Policy Attitudes And Preferences For Free Trade," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 26(2), pages 1-9, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:joaaec:15186
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.15186
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/15186/files/26020497.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.15186?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark A. Edelman & Paul Lasley, 1988. "An Analysis of the Agricultural and Trade Policy Preferences of Iowa Farm Operators," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 10(2), pages 243-254.
    2. Andrew P. Barkley & Barry L. Flinchbaugh, 1990. "Farm Operator Opinion and Agricultural Policy; Kansas Survey Results," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 12(2), pages 223-239.
    3. Jayachandran N. Variyam & Jeffrey L. Jordan & James E. Epperson, 1990. "Preferences of Citizens for Agricultural Policies: Evidence from a National Survey," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 72(2), pages 257-267.
    4. Edelman, Mark & Lasley, Paul, 1988. "An Analysis of Agricultural and Trade Policy Preferences of Iowa Farm Operators," Staff General Research Papers Archive 11041, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Heo, Seong-Yoon & Kim, Sanghyo & Zulauf, Carl & Lee, Kye-Im, 2016. "Satisfaction with Food Policies for Consumer: A Case Study of South Korea," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 236145, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Keith H. Coble & Thomas O. Knight & George F. Patrick & Alan E. Baquet, 2002. "Understanding the Economic Factors Influencing Farm Policy Preferences," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 24(2), pages 309-321.
    3. Wolf, Christopher A. & Tonsor, Glynn T., 2012. "Dairy Farmer Preferences for 2012 Farm Bill," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124866, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Abele Kuipers & Agata Malak-Rawlikowska & Aldona Stalgienė & Anita Ule & Marija Klopčič, 2021. "European Dairy Farmers’ Perceptions and Responses towards Development Strategies in Years of Turbulent Market and Policy Changes," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, March.
    5. Li, Ho-Shui & Houston, Jack E., 2001. "Factors Affecting Consumer Preferences For Major Food Markets In Taiwan," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 32(1), pages 1-13, March.
    6. Efthalia Dimara & Dimitris Skuras, 1999. "Importance and Need for Rural Development Instruments Under the CAP: A Survey of Farmers' Attitudes in Marginal Areas of Greece," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(2), pages 304-315, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keith H. Coble & Thomas O. Knight & George F. Patrick & Alan E. Baquet, 2002. "Understanding the Economic Factors Influencing Farm Policy Preferences," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 24(2), pages 309-321.
    2. Orazem, Peter F. & Otto, Daniel M. & Edelman, Mark A., 1988. "An Analysis of Farmers' Agricultural Policy Preferences: An Ordered Probit Approach," 1988 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Knoxville, Tennessee 270399, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Makus, Larry D. & Guenthner, Joseph F. & Lin, Biing-Hwan, 1992. "Factors Influencing Producer Support For A State Mandatory Seed Law: An Empirical Analysis," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 17(2), pages 1-8, December.
    4. Olsen, Douglas Ray, 1990. "An analysis of the use of farm marketing and crop insurance risk transfer tools by Iowa farm characteristics," ISU General Staff Papers 1990010108000018157, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    5. Wolf, Christopher A. & Tonsor, Glynn T., 2012. "Dairy Farmer Preferences for 2012 Farm Bill," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124866, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Tatyana Deryugina & Barrett Kirwan, 2018. "Does The Samaritan'S Dilemma Matter? Evidence From U.S. Agriculture," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 56(2), pages 983-1006, April.
    7. Lusk, Jayson L., 2012. "The political ideology of food," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 530-542.
    8. Kalaitzandonakes, Maria & Ellison, Brenna & Coppess, Jonathan, 2022. "Public Perception of Government Support for Farmers: Gardner Survey Results, Part 3," farmdoc daily, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, vol. 12(91), June.
    9. Johnston, Robert J., 2003. "Forecasting Support For Rural Land Use Policies: The Role Of Preference Asymmetries," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22156, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    10. Carreira, Rita I. & Mane, R. & Danforth, Diana M. & Wailes, Eric J., 2008. "Attitudes of College Students towards Agriculture, Food and the Role of Government," 2008 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2008, Dallas, Texas 6806, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    11. Reich, Denis Andrew, 2007. "Evaluating the Conservation Security Program utilizing the perceptions and economics of producer participation: implications for land stewardship in Iowa agriculture," ISU General Staff Papers 2007010108000016024, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    12. Peter Howley & Stephen Hynes & Cathal O’Donoghue, 2009. "Countryside Preferences: Exploring individuals’ WTP for the protection of traditional rural landscapes," Working Papers 0906, Rural Economy and Development Programme,Teagasc.
    13. Conley, Dennis M. & Wade, Mark A., 2007. "Consumer Responses to Food Safety Information from Print Media," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22.
    14. Onianwa, Okwudili O. & Wesson, Betty & Wheelock, Gerald, 2000. "An Analysis Of The Retail-Level Market Potential For Locally Grown Shiitake Mushrooms In North Alabama," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 31(1), pages 1-10, March.
    15. Klaus Mittenzwei & Stefan Mann & Karen Refsgaard & Valborg Kvakkestad, 2016. "Hot cognition in agricultural policy preferences in Norway?," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 33(1), pages 61-71, March.
    16. Lori Lynch & Wesley N. Musser, 2001. "A Relative Efficiency Analysis of Farmland Preservation Programs," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 77(4), pages 577-594.
    17. Johnston, Robert J. & Roheim, Cathy A. & Donath, Holger & Asche, Frank, 2001. "Measuring Consumer Preferences For Ecolabeled Seafood: An International Comparison," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 26(1), pages 1-20, July.
    18. Peter Howley & Stephen Hynes & Cathal O’Donoghue, 2009. "The citizen versus consumer hypothesis: Do welfare estimates differ?," Working Papers 0911, Rural Economy and Development Programme,Teagasc.
    19. Gomez-Limon, J.A. & Atance, I., 2004. "Identification of public objectives related to agricultural sector support," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 26(8-9), pages 1045-1071, December.
    20. Hellerstein, Daniel & Nickerson, Cynthia J. & Cooper, Joseph C. & Feather, Peter & Gadsby, Dwight M. & Mullarkey, Daniel J. & Tegene, Abebayehu & Barnard, Charles H., 2002. "Farmland Protection: The Role Of Public Preferences For Rural Amenities," Agricultural Economic Reports 33963, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International Relations/Trade;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:joaaec:15186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.