IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijaeri/333826.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects Of Different Tillage Practices On Soil Fertility Properties: A Review

Author

Listed:
  • OKORIE, Benedict Odinaka
  • NIRAJ, Yadav

Abstract

Soil tillage is an important factor affecting soil fertility properties and crop yield. Tillage impact certain soil physical and chemical properties such as bulk density, soil porosity and waterholding capacity, infiltration rates, hydraulic conductivity, soil temperature, soil organic carbon, pH, CEC, available nitrogen, phosphorus and exchangeable potassium amongst others. The main objective of the present work was to compare the effect of no-tillage systems and the conventional tillage systems. Tillage systems can be generally categorized into plow tillage (conventional tillage), reduced tillage using chisel plow, disc plow, harrow disc or cultivators and no-till systems. Conservation tillage and its various types generally improve the soil quality indicators including soil organic carbon (SOC) storage. Whereas, conventional tillage practices give birth to a finer and loose-setting soil structure with a modified soil bulk density and soil moisture content, hence, causing loss of soil organic carbon and deterioration in other soil properties. Generally, soil fertility properties are more favourable with no-till than tillage-based systems. However, some researchers observed no significant effect of tillage methods (no-tillage and plow till) on bulk density (BD), pH and total porosity, while others found otherwise. The magnitude of these discrepancies could be due to the differences in crop species, soil properties, climatic characteristics and their complex interactions as well as tillage system adopted.

Suggested Citation

  • OKORIE, Benedict Odinaka & NIRAJ, Yadav, 2022. "Effects Of Different Tillage Practices On Soil Fertility Properties: A Review," International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, Malwa International Journals Publication, vol. 8(1), February.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijaeri:333826
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.333826
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/333826/files/ijaer_08__12.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.333826?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David S. Powlson & Clare M. Stirling & M. L. Jat & Bruno G. Gerard & Cheryl A. Palm & Pedro A. Sanchez & Kenneth G. Cassman, 2014. "Limited potential of no-till agriculture for climate change mitigation," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 4(8), pages 678-683, August.
    2. Liu, S. & Yang, J.Y. & Zhang, X.Y. & Drury, C.F. & Reynolds, W.D. & Hoogenboom, G., 2013. "Modelling crop yield, soil water content and soil temperature for a soybean–maize rotation under conventional and conservation tillage systems in Northeast China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 32-44.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dutta, S. K & Laing, Alison M. & Kumar, S. & Gathala, Mahesh K. & Singh, Ajoy K. & Gaydon, D.S. & Poulton, P., 2020. "Improved water management practices improve cropping system profitability and smallholder farmers’ incomes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    2. Tiziano Gomiero, 2016. "Soil Degradation, Land Scarcity and Food Security: Reviewing a Complex Challenge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-41, March.
    3. Shuang Liu & Yuru Gao & Huilin Lang & Yong Liu & Hong Zhang, 2022. "Effects of Conventional Tillage and No-Tillage Systems on Maize ( Zea mays L.) Growth and Yield, Soil Structure, and Water in Loess Plateau of China: Field Experiment and Modeling Studies," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-14, October.
    4. Josue De Los Rios & Arne Poyda & Friedhelm Taube & Christof Kluß & Ralf Loges & Thorsten Reinsch, 2022. "No-Till Mitigates SOC Losses after Grassland Renovation and Conversion to Silage Maize," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Andrzej Woźniak, 2019. "Chemical Properties and Enzyme Activity of Soil as Affected by Tillage System and Previous Crop," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-8, December.
    6. Ruishi Si & Yumeng Yao & Xueqian Zhang & Qian Lu & Noshaba Aziz, 2022. "Exploring the Role of Contiguous Farmland Cultivation and Adoption of No-Tillage Technology in Improving Transferees’ Income Structure: Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-25, April.
    7. Huang, Yawen & Tao, Bo & Yang, Yanjun & Zhu, Xiaochen & Yang, Xiaojuan & Grove, John H. & Ren, Wei, 2022. "Simulating no-tillage effects on crop yield and greenhouse gas emissions in Kentucky corn and soybean cropping systems: 1980–2018," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    8. Veltman, Karin & Rotz, C. Alan & Chase, Larry & Cooper, Joyce & Ingraham, Pete & Izaurralde, R. César & Jones, Curtis D. & Gaillard, Richard & Larson, Rebecca A. & Ruark, Matt & Salas, William & Thoma, 2018. "A quantitative assessment of Beneficial Management Practices to reduce carbon and reactive nitrogen footprints and phosphorus losses on dairy farms in the US Great Lakes region," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 10-25.
    9. Ai, Pengrui & Ma, Yingjie & Hai, Ying, 2021. "Influence of jujube/cotton intercropping on soil temperature and crop evapotranspiration in an arid area," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    10. Kiani, Mina & Gheysari, Mahdi & Mostafazadeh-Fard, Behrouz & Majidi, Mohammad Mahdi & Karchani, Kazem & Hoogenboom, Gerrit, 2016. "Effect of the interaction of water and nitrogen on sunflower under drip irrigation in an arid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 162-172.
    11. Xiaolin Yang & Jinran Xiong & Taisheng Du & Xiaotang Ju & Yantai Gan & Sien Li & Longlong Xia & Yanjun Shen & Steven Pacenka & Tammo S. Steenhuis & Kadambot H. M. Siddique & Shaozhong Kang & Klaus But, 2024. "Diversifying crop rotation increases food production, reduces net greenhouse gas emissions and improves soil health," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Kim, Daesoo & Stoddart, Nick & Rotz, C. Alan & Veltman, Karin & Chase, Larry & Cooper, Joyce & Ingraham, Pete & Izaurralde, R. César & Jones, Curtis D. & Gaillard, Richard & Aguirre-Villegas, Horacio , 2019. "Analysis of beneficial management practices to mitigate environmental impacts in dairy production systems around the Great Lakes," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    13. Wang, Siang-Heng & Juang, Jehn-Yih, 2024. "Different management strategies exert distinct influences on microclimate of soil and canopy in tea fields through surface-atmosphere interactions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    14. Charlotte Y. Stanton & Katharine J. Mach & Peter A. Turner & Seth J. Lalonde & Daniel L. Sanchez & Christopher B. Field, 2018. "Managing cropland and rangeland for climate mitigation: an expert elicitation on soil carbon in California," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 147(3), pages 633-646, April.
    15. Ngoma, Hambulo & Angelsen, Arild, 2018. "Can conservation agriculture save tropical forests? The case of minimum tillage in Zambia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 153-162.
    16. Araya, A. & Prasad, P.V.V. & Gowda, P.H. & Afewerk, A. & Abadi, B. & Foster, A.J., 2019. "Modeling irrigation and nitrogen management of wheat in northern Ethiopia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 264-272.
    17. Jeetendra Prakash Aryal & Dil Bahadur Rahut & Tek B. Sapkota & Ritika Khurana & Arun Khatri-Chhetri, 2020. "Climate change mitigation options among farmers in South Asia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3267-3289, April.
    18. Juan Cruz Colazo & Juan de Dios Herrero & Ricardo Sager & Maria Laura Guzmán & Mohammad Zaman, 2022. "Contribution of Integrated Crop Livestock Systems to Climate Smart Agriculture in Argentina," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-11, November.
    19. Bos, Jules F.F.P. & ten Berge, Hein F.M. & Verhagen, Jan & van Ittersum, Martin K., 2017. "Trade-offs in soil fertility management on arable farms," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 292-302.
    20. Araya, A. & Kisekka, Isaya & Gowda, Prasanna H. & Prasad, P.V. Vara, 2017. "Evaluation of water-limited cropping systems in a semi-arid climate using DSSAT-CSM," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 86-98.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Agricultural and Food Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijaeri:333826. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ijaer.in/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.