IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i11p1881-d951133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Conventional Tillage and No-Tillage Systems on Maize ( Zea mays L.) Growth and Yield, Soil Structure, and Water in Loess Plateau of China: Field Experiment and Modeling Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Shuang Liu

    (Shanxi Subalpine Grassland Ecosystem Field Observation and Research Station of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Loess Plateau, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China)

  • Yuru Gao

    (Shanxi Subalpine Grassland Ecosystem Field Observation and Research Station of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Loess Plateau, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China)

  • Huilin Lang

    (Shanxi Subalpine Grassland Ecosystem Field Observation and Research Station of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Loess Plateau, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China)

  • Yong Liu

    (Shanxi Subalpine Grassland Ecosystem Field Observation and Research Station of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Loess Plateau, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China)

  • Hong Zhang

    (College of Environment and Resources, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China)

Abstract

Cropping system models can be useful tools for assessing tillage systems, which are both economically and environmentally viable. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the decision support system for agrotechnology transfer (DSSAT) CERES-Maize model’s ability to predict maize growth and yield, as well as soil water dynamics, and to apply the evaluated model to predict evapotranspiration processes under conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT) systems in a semi-arid loess plateau area of China from 2014 to 2016. The field experiment results showed that NT increased the surface soil bulk density and water-holding capacity but decreased the total porosity for the surface soil and the maize grain yield. Model calibration for maize cultivar was achieved using grain yield measurements from 2014 to 2016 for CT, and model evaluation was achieved using soil and crop measurements from both CT and NT for the same 3 yr period. Good agreement was reached for CT grain yields for model calibration (nRMSE = 4.02%; d = 0.87), indicating that the model was successfully calibrated. Overall, the results of model evaluation were acceptable, with good agreement for NT grain yields (nRMSE = 4.26%; d = 0.86); the agreement for LAI ranged from good to moderate (RMSE = 0.30‒0.31; d = 0.84‒0.85); the agreement for soil water content was good for NT (RMSE = 0.03‒0.08; d = 0.81‒0.95), but ranged from good to poor for CT (RMSE = 0.06‒0.09; d = 0.42‒0.88); the overall agreement between measured and simulated soil water varied from poor to good depending on soil depth and tillage. It was concluded that the DSSAT CERES-Maize model provided generally good-to-moderate simulations of continuous maize production (yield and LAI) for a short-term tillage experiment in the loess plateau, China, but generally good-to-poor simulations of soil water content.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuang Liu & Yuru Gao & Huilin Lang & Yong Liu & Hong Zhang, 2022. "Effects of Conventional Tillage and No-Tillage Systems on Maize ( Zea mays L.) Growth and Yield, Soil Structure, and Water in Loess Plateau of China: Field Experiment and Modeling Studies," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-14, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:11:p:1881-:d:951133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/11/1881/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/11/1881/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gan, Y. & Campbell, C.A. & Liu, L. & Basnyat, P. & McDonald, C.L., 2009. "Water use and distribution profile under pulse and oilseed crops in semiarid northern high latitude areas," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 337-348, February.
    2. Mailhol, Jean Claude & Olufayo, Ayorinde A. & Ruelle, Pierre, 1997. "Sorghum and sunflower evapotranspiration and yield from simulated leaf area index," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(1-2), pages 167-182, December.
    3. Liu, S. & Yang, J.Y. & Zhang, X.Y. & Drury, C.F. & Reynolds, W.D. & Hoogenboom, G., 2013. "Modelling crop yield, soil water content and soil temperature for a soybean–maize rotation under conventional and conservation tillage systems in Northeast China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 32-44.
    4. Khaledian, M.R. & Mailhol, J.C. & Ruelle, P. & Rosique, P., 2009. "Adapting PILOTE model for water and yield management under direct seeding system: The case of corn and durum wheat in a Mediterranean context," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(5), pages 757-770, May.
    5. M.R. Khaledian & J.C. Mailhol & P. Ruelle & J.L. Rosique, 2009. "Adapting PILOTE model for water and yield management under direct seeding system: The case of corn and durum wheat in a Mediterranean context," Post-Print hal-00454543, HAL.
    6. Su, Ziyou & Zhang, Jinsong & Wu, Wenliang & Cai, Dianxiong & Lv, Junjie & Jiang, Guanghui & Huang, Jian & Gao, Jun & Hartmann, Roger & Gabriels, Donald, 2007. "Effects of conservation tillage practices on winter wheat water-use efficiency and crop yield on the Loess Plateau, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 307-314, February.
    7. Jin, Y.H. & Zhou, D.W. & Jiang, S.C., 2010. "Comparison of soil water content and corn yield in furrow and conventional ridge sown systems in a semiarid region of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 326-332, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laike Kebede & Melesse Temesgen & Abebe Fanta & Asfaw Kebede & Johan Rockström & Assefa M. Melesse, 2023. "Effect of Locally Adapted Conservation Tillage on Runoff, Soil Erosion, and Agronomic Performance in Semiarid Rain-Fed Farming in Ethiopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, S. & Yang, J.Y. & Zhang, X.Y. & Drury, C.F. & Reynolds, W.D. & Hoogenboom, G., 2013. "Modelling crop yield, soil water content and soil temperature for a soybean–maize rotation under conventional and conservation tillage systems in Northeast China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 32-44.
    2. Shuang Liu & Jianye Li & Xingyi Zhang, 2022. "Simulations of Soil Water and Heat Processes for No Tillage and Conventional Tillage Systems in Mollisols of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Mubarak, Ibrahim & Mailhol, Jean Claude & Angulo-Jaramillo, Rafael & Bouarfa, Sami & Ruelle, Pierre, 2009. "Effect of temporal variability in soil hydraulic properties on simulated water transfer under high-frequency drip irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 1547-1559, November.
    4. Elamri, Y. & Cheviron, B. & Lopez, J.-M. & Dejean, C. & Belaud, G., 2018. "Water budget and crop modelling for agrivoltaic systems: Application to irrigated lettuces," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 440-453.
    5. M.R. Khaledian & J.C. Mailhol & P. Ruelle & C. Dejean, 2013. "Effect of cropping strategies on the irrigation water productivity of durum wheat," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 59(1), pages 29-36.
    6. Albasha, Rami & Mailhol, Jean-Claude & Cheviron, Bruno, 2015. "Compensatory uptake functions in empirical macroscopic root water uptake models – Experimental and numerical analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 22-39.
    7. Sebastian Kloss & Raji Pushpalatha & Kefasi Kamoyo & Niels Schütze, 2012. "Evaluation of Crop Models for Simulating and Optimizing Deficit Irrigation Systems in Arid and Semi-arid Countries Under Climate Variability," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(4), pages 997-1014, March.
    8. Wei, Zheng & Paredes, Paula & Liu, Yu & Chi, Wei Wei & Pereira, Luis S., 2015. "Modelling transpiration, soil evaporation and yield prediction of soybean in North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 43-53.
    9. Popova, Zornitsa & Pereira, Luis S., 2011. "Modelling for maize irrigation scheduling using long term experimental data from Plovdiv region, Bulgaria," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(4), pages 675-683, February.
    10. Yang, Xuan & Zheng, Lina & Yang, Qian & Wang, Zikui & Cui, Song & Shen, Yuying, 2018. "Modelling the effects of conservation tillage on crop water productivity, soil water dynamics and evapotranspiration of a maize-winter wheat-soybean rotation system on the Loess Plateau of China using," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 111-123.
    11. Richard, Bastien & Bonté, Bruno & Delmas, Magalie & Braud, Isabelle & Cheviron, Bruno & Veyssier, Julien & Barreteau, Olivier, 2022. "A co-simulation approach to study the impact of gravity collective irrigation constraints on plant dynamics in Southern France," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    12. Mailhol, J.-C. & Albasha, R. & Cheviron, B. & Lopez, J.-M. & Ruelle, P. & Dejean, C., 2018. "The PILOTE-N model for improving water and nitrogen management practices: Application in a Mediterranean context," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 162-179.
    13. Mathobo, Rudzani & Marais, Diana & Steyn, Joachim Martin, 2018. "Calibration and validation of the SWB model for dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) at different drought stress levels," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 113-121.
    14. Surendran, U. & Madhava Chandran, K., 2022. "Development and evaluation of drip irrigation and fertigation scheduling to improve water productivity and sustainable crop production using HYDRUS," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    15. Shi, Jianchu & Wu, Xun & Zhang, Mo & Wang, Xiaoyu & Zuo, Qiang & Wu, Xiaoguang & Zhang, Hongfei & Ben-Gal, Alon, 2021. "Numerically scheduling plant water deficit index-based smart irrigation to optimize crop yield and water use efficiency," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    16. Mailhol, Jean Claude & Ruelle, Pierre & Walser, Sabine & Schütze, Niels & Dejean, Cyril, 2011. "Analysis of AET and yield predictions under surface and buried drip irrigation systems using the Crop Model PILOTE and Hydrus-2D," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(6), pages 1033-1044, April.
    17. Dutta, S. K & Laing, Alison M. & Kumar, S. & Gathala, Mahesh K. & Singh, Ajoy K. & Gaydon, D.S. & Poulton, P., 2020. "Improved water management practices improve cropping system profitability and smallholder farmers’ incomes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    18. Kang, Fenni & Cournède, Paul-Henry & Lecoeur, Jérémie & Letort, Véronique, 2014. "SUNLAB: A functional–structural model for genotypic and phenotypic characterization of the sunflower crop," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 290(C), pages 21-33.
    19. OKORIE, Benedict Odinaka & NIRAJ, Yadav, 2022. "Effects Of Different Tillage Practices On Soil Fertility Properties: A Review," International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, Malwa International Journals Publication, vol. 8(1), February.
    20. Wu, Lin & Le Dimet, François-Xavier & de Reffye, Philippe & Hu, Bao-Gang & Cournède, Paul-Henry & Kang, Meng-Zhen, 2012. "An optimal control methodology for plant growth—Case study of a water supply problem of sunflower," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 82(5), pages 909-923.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:11:p:1881-:d:951133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.