IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ifaamr/93557.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Product Life Cycles and Innovation in the US Seed Corn Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Magnier, Alexandre
  • Kalaitzandonakes, Nicholas G.
  • Miller, Douglas J.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate potential changes in the length of product life cycles in the US seed corn industry. We use the observed survival time on the market for hybrids sold during 1997-2009 to conduct a survival analysis. Our empirical results show that the expected lifetimes for corn hybrids with single biotech traits are 5-15% longer than for hybrids with multiple (stacked) traits, and the expected lifetimes for conventional corn are 13-17% longer than stacked hybrids. Also, the product life cycles for all types of hybrids have decreased over the past twelve years (especially after 2004), but the rate of decline is roughly similar across hybrid types. Based on this evidence, we conclude that the shorter product life cycles are closely linked to the accelerated levels of biotech product innovation in the US seed corn industry over the period of analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Magnier, Alexandre & Kalaitzandonakes, Nicholas G. & Miller, Douglas J., 2010. "Product Life Cycles and Innovation in the US Seed Corn Industry," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifaamr:93557
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.93557
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/93557/files/2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.93557?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pilar Useche & Bradford L. Barham & Jeremy D. Foltz, 2006. "Integrating Technology Traits and Producer Heterogeneity: A Mixed-Multinomial Model of Genetically Modified Corn Adoption," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 91(2), pages 444-461.
    2. Barry L. Bayus, 1998. "An Analysis of Product Lifetimes in a Technologically Dynamic Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(6), pages 763-775, June.
    3. Shane M. Greenstein & James B. Wade, 1998. "The Product Life Cycle in the Commercial Mainframe Computer Market, 1968-1982," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 29(4), pages 772-789, Winter.
    4. Dooley, Frank J. & Kurtz, Matthew M., 2001. "The Effect Of A Changing Market Mix In Seed Corn On Inventory Costs," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20741, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Olshavsky, Richard W, 1980. "Time and the Rate of Adoption of Innovations," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 6(4), pages 425-428, March.
    6. Philip C. Jones & Timothy J. Lowe & Rodney D. Traub, 2002. "Matching Supply and Demand: The Value of a Second Chance in Producing Seed Corn," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 24(1), pages 222-238.
    7. Philip C. Jones & Timothy J. Lowe & Rodney D. Traub, 2002. "Matching Supply and Demand: The Value of a Second Chance in Producing Seed Corn," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 24(1), pages 222-238.
    8. Klepper, Steven, 1996. "Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(3), pages 562-583, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Seungki Lee & GianCarlo Moschini, 2020. "Estimating the Value of Innovation and Extension Information: SCNResistant Soybean Varieties," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 20-wp603, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    2. Bastgen, A. & Holzner, C.L., 2017. "Employment protection and the market for innovations," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 77-93.
    3. MacDonald, James M. & Dong, Xiao & Fuglie, Keith O., 2023. "Concentration and Competition in U.S. Agribusiness," Economic Information Bulletin 337566, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Shakya, Sumadhur & Wilson, William W. & Dahl, Bruce L., 2012. "Valuing New Random GM Traits: The Case of Drought Tolerant Wheat," Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report 128033, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    5. Perry, Edward & Hennessy, David A. & Moschini, GianCarlo, 2018. "Planting Rates in U.S. Maize: Improved Varieties and Learning," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274341, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Kalaitzandonakes, Nicholas & Magnier, Alexandre, 2013. "The economics of adventitious presence thresholds in the EU seed market," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 237-247.
    7. Shakya, Sumadhur & Wilson, William W. & Dahl, Bruce L., 2013. "Valuing New Random Genetically Modified (GM) Traits in Corn," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 38(1), pages 1-17, April.
    8. Feeney, Roberto Juan & Harmath, Pedro & Clay, Pablo Mac, 2020. "Brand Loyalty in Argentine Commercial Crop Seed Markets," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 9, April.
    9. Federico Ciliberto & GianCarlo Moschini & Edward D. Perry, 2019. "Valuing product innovation: genetically engineered varieties in US corn and soybeans," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 50(3), pages 615-644, September.
    10. Saavoss, Monica & Capehart, Tom & McBride, William & Effland, Anne, 2021. "Trends in Production Practices and Costs of the U.S. Corn Sector," USDA Miscellaneous 312954, United States Department of Agriculture.
    11. Melinda Smale & John Olwande, 2014. "Demand for maize hybrids and hybrid change on smallholder farms in Kenya," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 45(4), pages 409-420, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Camerani, Roberto & Corrocher, Nicoletta & Fontana, Roberto, 2020. "It's never too late (to enter)… till it is! Firms’ entry and exit in the digital audio player industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    2. Christophe Van den Bulte, 2000. "New Product Diffusion Acceleration: Measurement and Analysis," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 366-380, June.
    3. Euy-Young Jung & Chulwoo Baek & Jeong-Dong Lee, 2012. "Product survival analysis for the App Store," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 929-941, December.
    4. Mô José Moral & Jordi Jaumandreu, "undated". "Automobile demand, model cycle and price effects," Studies on the Spanish Economy 64, FEDEA.
    5. Karen Ruckman & Nilesh Saraf & Vallabh Sambamurthy, 2015. "Market Positioning by IT Service Vendors Through Imitation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 100-126, March.
    6. Barry L. Bayus & Rajshree Agarwal, 2007. "The Role of Pre-Entry Experience, Entry Timing, and Product Technology Strategies in Explaining Firm Survival," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(12), pages 1887-1902, December.
    7. Harrington, David H. & Jefferson-Moore, Kenrett Y., 2006. "The Distribution of Rents in Supply Chain Industries: The Case of High Oil Corn," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25579, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Olga M. Khessina & Glenn R. Carroll, 2008. "Product Demography of De Novo and De Alio Firms in the Optical Disk Drive Industry, 1983--1999," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 25-38, February.
    9. Bonaccorsi, Andrea & Giuri, Paola, 2000. "When shakeout doesn't occur: The evolution of the turboprop engine industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(7-8), pages 847-870, August.
    10. J. Cameron Verhaal & Olga M. Khessina & Stanislav D. Dobrev, 2015. "Oppositional Product Names, Organizational Identities, and Product Appeal," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 1466-1484, October.
    11. Ma, Xingliang & Shi, Guanming, 2010. "GM vs. Non-GM: A Survival Analysis of Hybrid Seed Corn in the US," Staff Paper Series 553, University of Wisconsin, Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    12. L. Kamran Bilir, 2014. "Patent Laws, Product Life-Cycle Lengths, and Multinational Activity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(7), pages 1979-2013, July.
    13. Pinçe, Çerağ & Yücesan, Enver & Bhaskara, Prithveesha Govinda, 2021. "Accurate response in agricultural supply chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    14. Carree, M.A., 2000. "Interest and Hazard Rates of Russian Saving Banks," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2000-26-STR, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    15. Marcel Bednarz & Tom Broekel, 2020. "Pulled or pushed? The spatial diffusion of wind energy between local demand and supply," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 29(4), pages 893-916.
    16. Hideki Murakami & Yukari Matsuse & Koji Mukaigawa & Yushi Tsunoda, 2013. "Product lifecycle and choice of transportation modes: Japan' s evidence of import and export," Discussion Papers 2013-28, Kobe University, Graduate School of Business Administration.
    17. Francesco Fallucchi & Jan Niederreiter & Massimo Riccaboni, 2021. "Learning and dropout in contests: an experimental approach," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 90(2), pages 245-278, March.
    18. Krishna B. Kumar & Raghuram G. Rajan & Luigi Zingales, "undated". "What Determines Firm Size?," CRSP working papers 496, Center for Research in Security Prices, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago.
    19. Wagner, Rodrigo & Zahler, Andrés, 2015. "New exports from emerging markets: Do followers benefit from pioneers?," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 203-223.
    20. Mohamed Ayadi & Wided Mattoussi, 2014. "From Productivity to Exporting or Vice Versa? Evidence from Tunisian Manufacturing Sector," Working Papers 852, Economic Research Forum, revised Nov 2014.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifaamr:93557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifamaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.