IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ifaamr/34277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Should Imports Free-Ride Or Help Pay-- Decisions About Generic Promotion Programs For Agricultural Commodities

Author

Listed:
  • Sterns, James A.
  • Ricks, Donald J.

Abstract

Many U.S. agricultural commodity industries are currently considering if and how they might implement a mandatory national generic promotion program. As U.S. industries consider how to finance these programs, one of the key decisions they face is the choice to include or exempt imported products from promotional assessment fees. Free-riders, unwilling riders, exclusion costs, economies of scale, market share, seasonality of production, storage constraints, and the role of government are reviewed within the context of this choice. The paper concludes that perceptions of fairness and ownership of decision processes, commonly held objectives, and effective communication links are key factors affecting decisions about the structures of generic commodity promotion programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Sterns, James A. & Ricks, Donald J., 2000. "Should Imports Free-Ride Or Help Pay-- Decisions About Generic Promotion Programs For Agricultural Commodities," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 3(2), pages 1-17.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifaamr:34277
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.34277
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/34277/files/03020227.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.34277?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alston, Julian M. & Carman, Hoy F. & Chalfant, James A., 1994. "EVALUATING PRIMARY PRODUCT PROMOTION: The Returns to Generic Advertising by a Producer Cooperative in a Small, Open Economy," Promotion in the Marketing Mix: What Works, Where and Why, April 28-29, 1994, Toronto, Canada 279601, Regional Research Projects > NECC-63: Research Committee on Commodity Promotion.
    2. Goddard, E.W., 1994. "Nec-63 Conference On Promotion In The Marketing Mix: What Works Where And Why," Promotion in the Marketing Mix: What Works, Where and Why, April 28-29, 1994, Toronto, Canada 279588, Regional Research Projects > NECC-63: Research Committee on Commodity Promotion.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julian M. Alston & John M. Crespi & Harry M. Kaiser & Richard J. Sexton, 2007. "An Evaluation of California's Mandated Commodity Promotion Programs," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 29(1), pages 40-63.
    2. Piggott, Roley R., 1995. "Returns To Incremental Advertising Expenditure in the Presence of Cross-Commodity Impacts and Inseparable Markets: An Equilibrium Displacement Modeling Approach," New Methodologies for Commodity Promotion Economics, October 5-6, 1995, Sacramento, California 279624, Regional Research Projects > NECC-63: Research Committee on Commodity Promotion.
    3. Holloway, Garth J. & Peyton, L. James & Griffith, Garry R., 2000. "Was the Australian Meat and Live-stock Corporation's advertising efficient?," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 44(1), pages 1-27.
    4. Julian M. Alston & John W. Freebairn & Jennifer S. James, 2003. "Distributional issues in check-off funded programs," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(3), pages 277-287.
    5. Crespi, John M. & Marette, Stephan, 2001. "Are Assessments For Generic Advertising Optimal If Products Are Differentiated?," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20762, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    6. Freebairn, John W. & Alston, Julian M., 2001. "Generic advertising without supply control: implications of funding mechanisms for advertising intensities in competitive industries," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 45(1), pages 1-29.
    7. Kinnucan, Henry W., 2003. "Optimal generic advertising in an imperfectly competitive food industry with variable proportions," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 143-158, October.
    8. J. A. L. Cranfield, 2003. "Optimal Collective Investment in Generic Advertising, Export Market Promotion and Cost-of-Production-Reducing Research," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 51(3), pages 299-321, November.
    9. Alston, Julian M. & Carman, Hoy F. & Chalfant, James A. & Crespi, John M. & Sexton, Richard J. & Venner, Raymond J., 1998. "The California Prune Board's Promotion Program: An Evaluation," Research Reports 11926, University of California, Davis, Giannini Foundation.
    10. John M. Crespi, 2003. "The Generic Advertising Controversy: How Did We Get Here and Where Are We Going?," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 25(2), pages 294-315.
    11. Alston, Julian M. & Chalfant, James A. & Piggott, Nicholas E., 1995. "Demand Response And Returns To Incremental Advertising In The Australian Meat Industry," Economic Analysis of Meat Promotion, June 2-3, 1995, Denver, Colorado 279609, Regional Research Projects > NECC-63: Research Committee on Commodity Promotion.
    12. John M. Crespi & Stéphan Marette, 2003. "Are uniform assessments for generic advertising optimal if products are differentiated?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(3), pages 367-377.
    13. Julian M. Alston & James A. Chalfant & Jennifer S. James, 1999. "Doing well by doing a body good: An evaluation of the industry-funded nutrition education program conducted by the Dairy Council of California," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(3), pages 371-392.
    14. Hill, Debbie J. & Piggott, Roley R. & Griffith, Garry R., 1999. "Profitability Of Incremental Generic Promotion Expenditure By Australian Dairy Farmers," Working Papers 12913, University of New England, School of Economics.
    15. Kinnucan, Henry W., 1997. "Middlemen behaviour and generic advertising rents in competitive interrelated industries," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 41(2), pages 1-17.
    16. Kinnucan, Henry W. & Christian, Jason E., 1997. "A Method For Measuring Returns To Nonprice Export Promotion With Application To Almonds," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 22(1), pages 1-13, July.
    17. Reberte, J. Carlos & Schmit, Todd M. & Kaiser, Harry M., 1996. "An Ex Post Evaluation of Generic Egg Advertising in the U.S," Economic Evaluation of Commodity Promotion Programs in the Current Legal and Political Environment, October 7-8, 1996, Monterey, California 279662, Regional Research Projects > NECC-63: Research Committee on Commodity Promotion.
    18. Ding, Lily & Kinnucan, Henry W., 1996. "Market Allocation Rules For Nonprice Promotion With Farm Programs: U.S. Cotton," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 21(2), pages 1-17, December.
    19. Kinnucan, Henry W. & Ding, Lily & Xiao, Hui, 1996. "Nonprice Export Promotion with Market Distortions and Spillovers: The Case of IWS Wool Promotion in the United States," Agricultural Commodity Promotion Policies and Programs in the Global Agri-Food System, May 26-27, 1996, Cancun, Mexico 279650, Regional Research Projects > NECC-63: Research Committee on Commodity Promotion.
    20. Paul M. Patterson & Hans Olofsson & Timothy J. Richards & Sharon Sass, 1999. "An empirical analysis of state agricultural product promotions: A case study on Arizona Grown," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(2), pages 179-196.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Marketing;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifaamr:34277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifamaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.