IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/agreko/348003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land redistribution in South Africa’s land reform policy: a better way to select beneficiaries

Author

Listed:
  • Zantsi, Siphe
  • Greyling, Jan C.

Abstract

South Africa’s land reform policy might succeed better if it had clear criteria for selecting beneficiaries for land redistribution. The National Development Plan identifies the intended beneficiaries and states how they should be selected, but implementation of the plan is haphazard. A 2019 report by the Presidency’s Land Reform and Agriculture Advisory Panel recommends that the beneficiary selection process be clear and transparent. In this paper, we respond to the report and expand on a proposal in the 2020 draft Beneficiary Selection Policy. Our study is based on a review of the relevant policies and the literature on beneficiary selection, and a profile of 833 potential land redistribution beneficiaries randomly selected from three provinces in South Africa. We highlight the flaws in the existing selection methods. Building on the suggestion of Vink and Kirsten (2019) of a tender or job application process, we suggest improvements we suggest improvements that could reduce inefficiencies and make the selection process inclusive and transparent.

Suggested Citation

  • Zantsi, Siphe & Greyling, Jan C., 2021. "Land redistribution in South Africa’s land reform policy: a better way to select beneficiaries," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 60(2), April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:348003
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.348003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/348003/files/Land%20redistribution%20in%20South%20Africa%20s%20land%20reform%20policy%20%20a%20better%20way%20to%20select%20beneficiaries.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.348003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yann de Mey & Frankwin van Winsen & Erwin Wauters & Mark Vancauteren & Ludwig Lauwers & Steven Van Passel, 2014. "Farm-level evidence on risk balancing behavior in the EU-15," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 74(1), pages 17-37, April.
    2. Kevin Mearns, 2011. "Ekaluka Farmers' Association and the Land Reform Programme: Expectations and success factors," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 241-254.
    3. Karaan, Mohammad, 2006. "Re-imagining a future for South African agriculture," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 45(3), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Yann de Mey & Frankwin van Winsen & Erwin Wauters & Mark Vancauteren & Ludwig Lauwers & Steven Van Passel, 2014. "Farm-level evidence on risk balancing behavior in the EU-15," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 74(1), pages 17-37, April.
    5. Groenewald, J. A., 1971. "The State of South African agriculture- A Diagnosis," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 10(01), January.
    6. Johann Kirsten & Charles Machethe & Talent Ndlovu & Pascalina Lubambo, 2016. "Performance of land reform projects in the North West province of South Africa: Changes over time and possible causes," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 442-458, July.
    7. Keswell, Malcolm & Carter, Michael R., 2014. "Poverty and land redistribution," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 250-261.
    8. Binswanger-Mkhize, Hans P., 2014. "From failure to success in South African land reform," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 9(4), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Christoph R. Weiss, 1999. "Farm Growth and Survival: Econometric Evidence for Individual Farms in Upper Austria," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 81(1), pages 103-116.
    10. Vink, N., 1993. "Entrepreneurs And The Political Economy Of Reform In South African Agriculture," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 32(4), December.
    11. repec:ags:ijag24:345043 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. John Knight & Sharada Weir & Tassew Woldehanna, 2003. "The role of education in facilitating risk-taking and innovation in agriculture," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(6), pages 1-22.
    13. Thula S. Dlamini & Aart-Jan Verschoor & Gavin C.G. Fraser, 2013. "Exploring options in reforming South African land ownership: Opportunities for sharing land, labour and expertise," Agrekon, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(sup1), pages 24-45, March.
    14. Burger, P. J., 1971. "The Measurement of managerial inputs in agriculture III: the construction and evaluation of a scale," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 10(4), October.
    15. Ruth Hall & Thembela Kepe, 2017. "Elite capture and state neglect: new evidence on South Africa’s land reform," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(151), pages 122-130, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarker, Rakhal, 2024. "Farm Policy Support Payments and Risk Balancing Phenomenon in Grain and Oilseed Sector in Ontario, Canada," IAAE 2024 Conference, August 2-7, 2024, New Delhi, India 344398, International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE).
    2. Netshipale, A.J. & Raidimi, E.N. & Mashiloane, M.L. & de Boer, I.J.M. & Oosting, S.J., 2022. "Farming system diversity and its drivers in land reform farms of the Waterberg District, South Africa," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    3. Boubacar, Inoussa & Nene, Gibson, 2024. "Land to the landless: Does the type of approach matter?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    4. Verschoor, Aart-Jan & Gandidzanwa, Colleta & Newby, Terence & Collett, Anneliza & Venter, Sonja, 2023. "Proposing a farm assessment toolkit: evaluating a South African land reform case study," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 62(3-4), December.
    5. Authors Femi Michael Oluwatusin, 2014. "The Perception of and Adaptation to Climate Change among Cocoa Farm Households in Ondo State, Nigeria," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 3, March.
    6. Lovemore C. Gwiriri & James Bennett & Cletos Mapiye & Sara Burbi, 2021. "Emerging from Below? Understanding the Livelihood Trajectories of Smallholder Livestock Farmers in Eastern Cape Province, South Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-24, February.
    7. Elias Giannakis & Sophia Efstratoglou & Artemis Antoniades, 2018. "Off-Farm Employment and Economic Crisis: Evidence from Cyprus," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-11, March.
    8. B Kelsey Jack, "undated". "Market Inefficiencies and the Adoption of Agricultural Technologies in Developing Countries," CID Working Papers 50, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    9. Kindie, Getnet & Verbeke, Wim & Viaene, Jacques, 2006. "Stochastic Producer Prices and Shock Persistence in Agriculture: Implications for Food Policy and Price Information," Ethiopian Journal of Economics, Ethiopian Economics Association, vol. 12(2), pages 1-81, November.
    10. Yann de Mey & Erwin Wauters & Dierk Schmid & Markus Lips & Mark Vancauteren & Steven Van Passel, 2016. "Farm household risk balancing: empirical evidence from Switzerland," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 43(4), pages 637-662.
    11. Colleta Gandidzanwa & Aart Jan Verschoor & Thabo Sacolo, 2021. "Evaluating Factors Affecting Performance of Land Reform Beneficiaries in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-15, August.
    12. repec:ags:ijag24:346820 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Hong, Yan-Zhen & Chang, Hung-Hao & Dai, Yong-Wu, 2018. "Is deregulation of forest land use rights transactions associated with economic well-being and labor allocation of farm households? Empirical evidence in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 694-701.
    14. Tocco, Barbara & Bailey, Alastair & Davidova, Sophia & Raimondi, Valentina, 2015. "Women and Part-Time Farming: Understanding Labor Supply Decisions in Italian Farm Households," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211932, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Klaus Deininger & Songqing Jin & Yanyan Liu & Sudhir K. Singh, 2018. "Can Labor-Market Imperfections Explain Changes in the Inverse Farm Size–Productivity Relationship? Longitudinal Evidence from Rural India," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 94(2), pages 239-258.
    16. Thiermann, Insa & Schroeer, Daniel & Latacz-Lohmann, Uwe, 2022. "Are German farmers ready for ‘warm restructuring’ of the pig sector?," 96th Annual Conference, April 4-6, 2022, K U Leuven, Belgium 321201, Agricultural Economics Society - AES.
    17. Holden, Stein T. & Westberg, Nina Bruvik, 2016. "Exploring technology use under climate risk and shocks through an experimental lens," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 11(01), pages 1-16, March.
    18. Clemence Rusenga, 2019. "The Agribusiness Model in South African Land Reform? Land Use Implications for the Land Reform Beneficiaries," Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, Centre for Agrarian Research and Education for South, vol. 8(3), pages 440-461, December.
    19. Lovén, Ida & Nordin, Martin, 2020. "Are agri-environmental schemes boosting farm survival?," AgriFood-WP 2020:2, Lund University, AgriFood Economics Centre.
    20. Freudenreich, Hanna & Musshoff, Oliver & Wiercinski, Ben, 2017. "The Relationship between Farmers' Shock Experiences and their Uncertainty Preferences - Experimental Evidence from Mexico," GlobalFood Discussion Papers 256212, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, GlobalFood, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development.
    21. Magali Aubert & Geoffroy Enjolras, 2015. "Are short food supply chains a solution for farms facing financial difficulties?," Post-Print hal-02800273, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Farm Management; Land Economics/Use;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:348003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeasaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.