IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/agreko/31711.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the determinants of pork consumption in Bloemfontein, Central South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Oyewumi, Olubukola Ayodeju
  • Jooste, Andre

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to investigate the determinants of households' pork consumption using a logistic regression procedure. The model was initially fitted with ten variables, selected from factors identified by precious studies, that affect meat consumption in South Africa. Six of these variables were found to be significant at the 10 per cent significance level and all had the expected signs. These include household monthly income, current household monthly expenditure on meat, relative price of pork, preference for value-added pork products, prices of substitutes (the most preferred household meat type), and response of household to change in pork quality. The result obtained was further analyzed to compute partial effects and to conduct simulations for significant factors. Analysis of partial effects revealed that quality assurance and value-adding lead to much greater probability of pork consumption by households. Simulation conducted on the base category of pork-consuming households revealed that quality assurance and value-adding have relatively high potential to almost double and more than double household pork consumption respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Oyewumi, Olubukola Ayodeju & Jooste, Andre, 2006. "Measuring the determinants of pork consumption in Bloemfontein, Central South Africa," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 45(2), pages 1-13, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:31711
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.31711
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/31711/files/45020185.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.31711?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van Heereden, A. F. & van Zyl, J. & Vivier, F. L., 1989. "Price Inter-Relationships In The South African Meat Market Ii: An Empirical Application," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 28(01), February.
    2. Goldsmith, Peter D. & Gow, Hamish R., 2005. "Strategic Positioning Under Agricultural Structural Change: A Critique of Long Jump Co-operative Ventures," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 8(2), pages 1-21.
    3. David Dickinson & Jill Hobbs & DeeVon Bailey, 2003. "A Comparison of US and Canadian Consumers’ Willingness To Pay for Red-Meat Traceability," Working Papers 2003-06, Utah State University, Department of Economics.
    4. Rantho, Lillian, 2003. "Demographics of South African Households - 1995," Background Paper Series 15608, PROVIDE Project.
    5. Conrado M. Gempesaw & Richard Bacon & Cathy R. Wessells & Alberto Manalo, 1995. "Consumer Perceptions of Aquaculture Products," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 77(5), pages 1306-1312.
    6. McGuigan, S.M. & Nieuwoudt, W.L., 2002. "The Expected Consumption Of Protein Feed In South Africa By 2020," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 41(01).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:ags:ijag24:345075 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Botha, F. & Taljaard, P. & Alemu, Z. & Jooste, A. & Pelser, A., 2013. "Segmenting food consumption in the Free State province of South Africa," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 51(3), February.
    3. Bureau for Food and Agricultural Policy, 2013. "Evaluating the South African Pork Value Chain," BFAP Reports 279773, Bureau for Food and Agricultural Policy (BFAP), BFAP Reports.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bignon Yves Jean & Kwiatkowski Fabrice & Serlet Laurent, 2018. "What Selection Pressure Does to Mutations Favoring Cancer? Highlights of A Simulation Approach," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 10(4), pages 7987-7995, November.
    2. Charity, Nabwire Ephamia Juma, 2016. "Economic Analysis Of Consumers’ Awareness And Willingness To Pay For Geographical Indicators And Other Quality Attributes Of Honey In Kenya," Research Theses 265574, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    3. Whitacre, Rick C. & Winter, J. Randy, 2004. "Agguild Of Illinois: A New Generation Cooperative Without The Bricks And Mortar," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20321, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Micheels, Eric T. & Nolan, James F., 2016. "Examining the effects of absorptive capacity and social capital on the adoption of agricultural innovations: A Canadian Prairie case study," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 127-138.
    5. Goldsmith, Peter D. & Bender, Karen, 2003. "Ten Conversations about Identity Preservation: Implications for Cooperatives," 2003 Annual Meeting, October 29 31803, NCERA-194 Research on Cooperatives.
    6. Jasper Grashuis, 2018. "An Exploratory Study of Cooperative Survival: Strategic Adaptation to External Developments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, February.
    7. Brenes, Esteban R. & Montoya, Daniel & Ciravegna, Luciano, 2014. "Differentiation strategies in emerging markets: The case of Latin American agribusinesses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 847-855.
    8. Chao-Chien Chen & Hsiu-Ping Yueh & Chaoyun Liang, 2016. "Strategic Management of Agribusiness: Determinants and Trends," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 12(4), pages 69-97.
    9. Caswell, Julie A. & Joseph, Siny, 2007. "Consumer Demand for Quality: Major Determinant for Agricultural and Food Trade in the Future?," Working Paper Series 7390, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Department of Resource Economics.
    10. Schulz, Lee L. & Tonsor, Glynn T., 2010. "Cow-Calf Producer Perceptions Regarding Individual Animal Traceability," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(4), pages 659-677, November.
    11. Mueller Loose, Simone & Peschel, Anne & Grebitus, Carola, 2012. "Influence of convenience on healthy food choice: The case of seafood," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124715, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Rezgar Mohammed, 2020. "The Impact of Income on Household Expenditure on Dairy Products: Evidence from the United States Dairy Market," Eurasian Journal of Economics and Finance, Eurasian Publications, vol. 8(1), pages 16-23.
    13. Manglai & Micheels, Eric, 2017. "Pr - Returns To Record-Keeping And Benchmarking For Canadian Cow-Calf Producers," 21st Congress, Edinburgh, Scotland, July 2-7, 2017 345797, International Farm Management Association.
    14. Cao, Kay & Gibson, John & Scrimgeour, Frank G., 2005. "An Experimental Approach To Estimating Willingess-Topay For Improvements In Food Safety," 2005 Conference (49th), February 9-11, 2005, Coff's Harbour, Australia 137802, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    15. Wang, Shuxian & Wu, Linhai & Zhu, Dian & Wang, Hongsha & Xu, Lingling, 2014. "Chinese consumers’ preferences and willingness to pay for traceable food attributes: The case of pork," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 165639, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Yang Yang & Jill E. Hobbs, 2020. "Food values and heterogeneous consumer responses to nanotechnology," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 68(3), pages 289-313, September.
    17. Sigurdsson, Valdimar & Larsen, Nils Magne & Alemu, Mohammed Hussen & Gallogly, Joseph Karlton & Menon, R. G. Vishnu & Fagerstrøm, Asle, 2020. "Assisting sustainable food consumption: The effects of quality signals stemming from consumers and stores in online and physical grocery retailing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 458-471.
    18. Salavou, Helen E. & Sergaki, Panagiota, 2013. "Generic Business Strategies in Greece: Private Food Firms versus Agricultural Cooperatives," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 41(01), pages 1-17.
    19. Wu, Linhai & Wang, Shuxian & Zhu, Dian & Hu, Wuyang & Wang, Hongsha, 2015. "Chinese consumers’ preferences and willingness to pay for traceable food quality and safety attributes: The case of pork," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 121-136.
    20. Shi Zheng & Pei Xu & Zhigang Wang & Shunfeng Song, 2012. "Willingness to pay for traceable pork: evidence from Beijing, China," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 4(2), pages 200-215, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:31711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeasaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.