IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea12/124715.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Influence of convenience on healthy food choice: The case of seafood

Author

Listed:
  • Mueller Loose, Simone
  • Peschel, Anne
  • Grebitus, Carola

Abstract

Although seafood is considered to be a healthy food choice, the recommended consumption level of two servings per week is still not reached in most countries. Previous research has identified potential barriers of seafood consumption, including purchase and consumption convenience, but it is still unclear to what degree consumer choice is affected by convenience relative to known choice drivers such as price, species and region of origin. This study contributes to filling this research gap by analyzing how consumers’ in-store choice of readypackaged aquaculture oysters is driven by convenience factors (opened versus unopened presentation format, packaging format and accompaniments with or without visual serving suggestions) relative to traditionally examined demand factors of price, origin, species, health, environmental and quality claims. A total of 1,718 Australian oyster consumers participated in an online choice experiment with visual product stimuli to simulate their choice of oysters in a retail store. Considering preference heterogeneity respondents’ choices were analyzed with a scale adjusted latent class model and six different consumer segments differing in their preferences were identified. Over all respondents price, presentation format and species were the most important choice drivers, while packaging format and claims only had a minor impact on consumer choice. Origin and accompaniments were found to be important for some consumer segments. These results provide recommendations for policy makers as well as seafood marketers and are in line with the presented literature in that convenience seems to be an important driver which can be manipulated in order to increase seafood consumption. Consumers strongly prefer the ‘ready to eat’ half shell open oysters over closed oysters, although those are saver and keep fresh longer. Visual serving suggestions and accompaniments in form of easy to prepare flavor sachets were found to positively increase choice likelihood.

Suggested Citation

  • Mueller Loose, Simone & Peschel, Anne & Grebitus, Carola, 2012. "Influence of convenience on healthy food choice: The case of seafood," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124715, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea12:124715
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.124715
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/124715/files/Loose2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.124715?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Conrado M. Gempesaw & Richard Bacon & Cathy R. Wessells & Alberto Manalo, 1995. "Consumer Perceptions of Aquaculture Products," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 77(5), pages 1306-1312.
    2. K. Dhanda & Laura Hartman, 2011. "The Ethics of Carbon Neutrality: A Critical Examination of Voluntary Carbon Offset Providers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 100(1), pages 119-149, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elisabeth Albertini, 2019. "The Contribution of Management Control Systems to Environmental Capabilities," Post-Print halshs-02007194, HAL.
    2. Sigurdsson, Valdimar & Larsen, Nils Magne & Alemu, Mohammed Hussen & Gallogly, Joseph Karlton & Menon, R. G. Vishnu & Fagerstrøm, Asle, 2020. "Assisting sustainable food consumption: The effects of quality signals stemming from consumers and stores in online and physical grocery retailing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 458-471.
    3. Zola Berger‐Schmitz & Douglas George & Cameron Hindal & Richard Perkins & Maria Travaille, 2023. "What explains firms' net zero adoption, strategy and response?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5583-5601, December.
    4. Katrina Lintukangas & Heli Arminen & Anni-Kaisa Kähkönen & Elina Karttunen, 2023. "Determinants of Supply Chain Engagement in Carbon Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 87-104, August.
    5. Talbot, David & Boiral, Olivier, 2013. "Can we trust corporates GHG inventories? An investigation among Canada's large final emitters," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1075-1085.
    6. Joseph A. Johnson & Jochen Theis & Adam Vitalis & Donald Young, 2020. "The Influence of Firms' Emissions Management Strategy Disclosures on Investors' Valuation Judgments†," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(2), pages 642-664, June.
    7. Tingko Lee & Wei‐Tsung Liu & Jun‐Xian Yu, 2021. "Does TMT composition matter to environmental policy and firm performance? The role of organizational slack," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 196-213, January.
    8. Foltz, John & Dasgupta, Sid, 1998. "Perceptions Of Trout: Results Of A Consumer Study Usda/Fsmip Grant University Of Idaho In Cooperation With The Idaho Department Of Agriculture," A.E. Research Series 305154, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    9. Shepherd, Jack, 2024. "Tourism in Oppressed Destinations: Political responsibility and the prospect of oppression offsetting," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    10. Meenakshi Sharma & Rajesh Kaushal & Prashant Kaushik & Seeram Ramakrishna, 2021. "Carbon Farming: Prospects and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, October.
    11. Liu, Quanyou & Zhu, Dongya & Jin, Zhijun & Tian, Hailong & Zhou, Bing & Jiang, Peixue & Meng, Qingqiang & Wu, Xiaoqi & Xu, Huiyuan & Hu, Ting & Zhu, Huixing, 2023. "Carbon capture and storage for long-term and safe sealing with constrained natural CO2 analogs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    12. Spash, Clive L. & Theine, Hendrik, 2016. "Voluntary Individual Carbon Trading," SRE-Discussion Papers 2016/04, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
      • Clive L. Spash & Hendrik Theine, 2016. "Voluntary Individual Carbon Trading," SRE-Disc sre-disc-2016_04, Institute for Multilevel Governance and Development, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    13. Iker Larrea & Jose Manuel Correa & Rafaella López & Lidia Giménez & Kepa Solaun, 2022. "A Multicriteria Methodology to Evaluate Climate Neutrality Claims—A Case Study with Spanish Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, April.
    14. Pii‐Tuulia Nikula, 2022. "Beyond compliance – Voluntary climate mitigation by New Zealand firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1456-1464, September.
    15. Anderson, Brilé & Bernauer, Thomas, 2016. "How much carbon offsetting and where? Implications of efficiency, effectiveness, and ethicality considerations for public opinion formation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 387-395.
    16. Bui, Binh & de Villiers, Charl, 2017. "Business strategies and management accounting in response to climate change risk exposure and regulatory uncertainty," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 4-24.
    17. Jared L. Peifer & David R. Johnson & Elaine Howard Ecklund, 2019. "The Moral Limits of the Market: Science Commercialization and Religious Traditions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 183-197, June.
    18. Wu, Haijiang & Wang, Yu, 2024. "Integrating green resources and mineral dependency to address the urban-rural divide in China's carbon neutrality transition," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    19. Foltz, John C. & Dasgupta, Siddhartha & Devadoss, Stephen, 1999. "Consumer Perceptions Of Trout As A Food Item," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 2(01), pages 1-19.
    20. Britwum, Kofi & Noblet, Caroline L. & Evans, Keith S., 2018. "More Farms on The Water? U.S Consumers’ Perceptions of Aquaculture Practices and Products," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 273824, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety; Health Economics and Policy;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea12:124715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.