IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/agreko/267564.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Political Economy Of The South African Dairy Industry: A Public Choice Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Wright, P. D.
  • Nieuwoudt, W. L.

Abstract

The political economic structure of the South African Dairy Industry is analyzed using public choice theory. The Industry is comprised of various interest groups which are found to be interdependent. Some groups have the ability to inflict internal and external effects on other groups as a result of political power they possess. Manufacturers are the most politically effective group, having the ability to inflict external effects on other interest groups. They can spread the costs of the 'milk is milk' system among interest groups in the Industry. Their political power is mainly due to the dominant position they attained under protection of the Board before deregulation. Extensions of the public choice theory were found to be beneficial in explaining certain actions within the Industry. A gradual phasing out of regulation is recommended. Policymakers can still play an important role in providing traditional public goods and services such as information, restricting monopoly control and marketing promotions. Freedom of entry of new dairies is essential to protect the interests of consumers and producers.

Suggested Citation

  • Wright, P. D. & Nieuwoudt, W. L., 1993. "The Political Economy Of The South African Dairy Industry: A Public Choice Analysis," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 32(1), March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:267564
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.267564
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/267564/files/agrekon-32-01-004.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/267564/files/agrekon-32-01-004.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.267564?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wolf, Charles, Jr, 1979. "A Theory of Nonmarket Failure: Framework for Implementation Analysis," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 22(1), pages 107-139, April.
    2. Zusman, Pinhas, 1976. "The Incorporation and Measurement of Social Power in Economic Models," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 17(2), pages 447-462, June.
    3. William J. Martin, 1990. "Public Choice Theory And Australian Agricultural Policy Reform," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 34(3), pages 189-211, December.
    4. Pinhas Zusman & Amotz Amiad, 1977. "A Quantitative Investigation of a Political Economy—The Israeli Dairy Program," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 59(1), pages 88-98.
    5. George R. McDowell, 1985. "The Political Economy of Extension Program Design: Institutional Maintenance Issues in the Organization and Delivery of Extension Programs," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 67(4), pages 717-725.
    6. Robert D. Tollison, 1982. "Rent Seeking: A Survey," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 575-602, November.
    7. Dahlman, Carl J, 1979. "The Problem of Externality," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 22(1), pages 141-162, April.
    8. Gary S. Becker, 1983. "A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 98(3), pages 371-400.
    9. Charles W. Baird, 1989. "James Buchanan and the Austrians: The Common Ground," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 9(1), pages 201-230, Spring/Su.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kamath Shyam J., 1994. "Privatization: A Market Prospect Perspective," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 53-104, March.
    2. J.A. den Hertog, 2010. "Review of economic theories of regulation," Working Papers 10-18, Utrecht School of Economics.
    3. Arye Hillman & Dov Samet, 1987. "Dissipation of contestable rents by small numbers of contenders," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 63-82, January.
    4. Marcin Kalinowski, 2005. "Ekonomiczne przesłanki lobbingu w świetle teorii public choice," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 7-8, pages 29-44.
    5. John C. Beghin & William E. Foster & Mylene Kherallah, 1996. "Institutions And Market Distortions: International Evidence For Tobacco," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1‐4), pages 355-365, January.
    6. SM Helfand, 2000. "Interest Groups And Economic Policy: Explaining The Pattern Of Protection In The Brazilian Agricultural Sector," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 18(4), pages 462-476, October.
    7. William C. Mitchell, 1990. "Interest Groups: Economic Perspectives and Contributions," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 2(1), pages 85-108, January.
    8. Zusman, Pinhas, 1990. "Political-Econometrics: The Quantitative Investigation of a Political-Economy," CUDARE Working Papers 198570, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    9. van Lent, L.A.G.M., 1995. "Pressure and politics in financial accounting regulation," Research Memorandum FEW 686, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. Klaus Mittenzwei & David S. Bullock & Klaus Salhofer, 2012. "Towards a theory of policy timing," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 56(4), pages 583-596, October.
    11. Robert W. Hahn & Robert N. Stavins, 2011. "The Effect of Allowance Allocations on Cap-and-Trade System Performance," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 54(S4), pages 267-294.
    12. de Janvry, Alain & Sadoulet, Elisabeth, 1989. "Path Dependent Policy Reforms: From Land Refrom to Rural Development in Colombia," CUDARE Working Papers 198493, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    13. Rausser, Gordon C., 1991. "Predatory versus productive government: the case of U.S. agricultural policies," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt21913950, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    14. D. MacLaren, 1991. "Agricultural Trade Policy Analysis And International Trade Theory: A Review Of Recent Developments," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 250-297, September.
    15. Louis Rouanet, 2021. "The interest group origins of the Bank of France," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 119-140, January.
    16. Gordon C. Rausser, 1992. "Predatory versus Productive Government: The Case of U.S. Agricultural Policies," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 6(3), pages 133-157, Summer.
    17. Fertő, Imre, 1998. "Az agrárpolitika politikai gazdaságtana I. A kormányzati politikák modellezése a mezőgazdaságban [The political economy of agrarian politics. Part I. Modeling of governmental policies in agricultur," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 223-246.
    18. Eduardo Zambrano, 1999. "Formal Models Of Authority," Rationality and Society, , vol. 11(2), pages 115-138, May.
    19. William McEachern, 1987. "Federal advisory commissions in an economic model of representative democracy," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 41-62, January.
    20. Potters, Jan & Sloof, Randolph, 1996. "Interest groups: A survey of empirical models that try to assess their influence," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 403-442, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:267564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeasaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.