IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v24y2022i60p525.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Good Practices in Reforming the Common Agricultural Policy to Support the European Green Deal – A Perspective on the Consumption of Pesticides and Fertilizers

Author

Listed:
  • Alina Petronela Alexoaei

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Raluca Georgiana Robu

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Valentin Cojanu

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Dumitru Miron

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Ana-Maria Holobiuc

    (Romanian-American University, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Against the background of the goals of the European Green Deal to reduce the use of pesticides by 50% and fertilizers by 20% by 2030, the current analysis aims to: (1) identify key economic, institutional, and legislative levers that can play an important role in the agricultural specialization of the EU according to the European Green Deal and the reform of the Common Agricultural Policy; (2) analyze representative variables of the European agricultural environment during the 2000-2019 period concerning the alignment of Member States with the objectives of the Green Deal and the overall performance of the agricultural sector; (3) present a set of good practices to reduce the use of fertilizers and pesticides in agricultural systems based on the documentation of the impact of these substances on human health and the environment. The results show that available agricultural solutions, in line with the objectives of the Green Deal and the Common Agricultural Policy, are effective in practice. Our findings can help define national sustainable production policies and develop practical measures for farmers and companies in the agricultural industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Alina Petronela Alexoaei & Raluca Georgiana Robu & Valentin Cojanu & Dumitru Miron & Ana-Maria Holobiuc, 2022. "Good Practices in Reforming the Common Agricultural Policy to Support the European Green Deal – A Perspective on the Consumption of Pesticides and Fertilizers," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(60), pages 525-525, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:24:y:2022:i:60:p:525
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_3115.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schimmelpfennig, David & Ebel, Robert, 2011. "On the Doorstep of the Information Age: Recent Adoption of Precision Agriculture," Economic Information Bulletin 291945, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Valborg Kvakkestad & Åsmund Lægreid Steiro & Arild Vatn, 2021. "Pesticide Policies and Farm Behavior: The Introduction of Regulations for Integrated Pest Management," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Ebel, Robert M. & Schimmelpfennig, David E., 2011. "The Information Age and Adoption of Precision Agriculture," Amber Waves:The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, pages 1-1.
    4. Lohr, Luanne & Salomonsson, Lennart, 2000. "Conversion subsidies for organic production: results from Sweden and lessons for the United States," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 22(2), pages 133-146, March.
    5. Vasile Dinu, 2018. "Food Safety in the Context of the European Union," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 20(47), pages 1-5, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Raluca Georgiana Robu & Ana-Maria Holobiuc & Alina Petronela Alexoaei & Valentin Cojanu & Dumitru Miron, 2023. "Regional Patterns of Pesticide Consumption Determinants in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Irina Pilvere & Aleksejs Nipers & Aija Pilvere, 2022. "Evaluation of the European Green Deal Policy in the Context of Agricultural Support Payments in Latvia," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Madhu Khanna, 2021. "Digital Transformation of the Agricultural Sector: Pathways, Drivers and Policy Implications," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(4), pages 1221-1242, December.
    2. McFadden, Jonathan & Njuki, Eric & Griffin, Terry, 2023. "Precision Agriculture in the Digital Era: Recent Adoption on U.S. Farms," USDA Miscellaneous 333550, United States Department of Agriculture.
    3. J Blasch & B van der Kroon & P van Beukering & R Munster & S Fabiani & P Nino & S Vanino, 2022. "Farmer preferences for adopting precision farming technologies: a case study from Italy," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 49(1), pages 33-81.
    4. Katherine Lacy & Peter F. Orazem & Skyler Schneekloth, 2023. "Measuring the American farm size distribution," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(1), pages 219-242, January.
    5. Jonathan R. McFadden & Alicia Rosburg & Eric Njuki, 2022. "Information inputs and technical efficiency in midwest corn production: evidence from farmers' use of yield and soil maps," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(2), pages 589-612, March.
    6. MacDonald, James M. & Korb, Penni & Hoppe, Robert A., 2013. "Farm Size and the Organization of U.S. Crop Farming," Economic Research Report 262221, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Ebel, Robert M. & Schimmelpfennig, David E., 2012. "Production Cost and the Sequential Adoption of Precision Technology," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124393, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Canales, Elizabeth & Bergtold, Jason S. & Williams, Jeffery & Peterson, Jeffrey, 2015. "Estimating farmers’ risk attitudes and risk premiums for the adoption of conservation practices under different contractual arrangements: A stated choice experiment," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205640, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. Kangogo, Daniel & Dentoni, Domenico & Bijman, Jos, 2021. "Adoption of climate‐smart agriculture among smallholder farmers: Does farmer entrepreneurship matter?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    10. Schimmelpfennig, David & Lowenberg-DeBoer, James, 2020. "Farm types and precision agriculture adoption: crops, regions, soil variability, and farm size," Agri-Tech Economics Papers 304070, Harper Adams University, Land, Farm & Agribusiness Management Department.
    11. Griffin, Terry W. & Mark, Tyler B. & Ferrell, Shannon & Janzen, Todd & Ibendahl, Gregory & Bennett, Jeff D. & Maurer, Jacob L. & Shanoyan, Aleksan, 2016. "Big Data Considerations for Rural Property Professionals," Journal of the ASFMRA, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, vol. 2015, pages 1-14.
    12. Schimmelpfennig, David, 2016. "Farm Profits and Adoption of Precision Agriculture," Economic Research Report 249773, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    13. Luís Loures & Alejandro Chamizo & Paulo Ferreira & Ana Loures & Rui Castanho & Thomas Panagopoulos, 2020. "Assessing the Effectiveness of Precision Agriculture Management Systems in Mediterranean Small Farms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, May.
    14. Rejesus, Roderick M. & Marra, Michele C. & Roberts, Roland K. & English, Burton C. & Larson, James A. & Paxton, Kenneth W, 2013. "Changes in Producers’ Perceptions of Within-Field Yield Variability after Adoption of Cotton Yield Monitors," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 45(2), pages 1-18, May.
    15. Fausti, Scott W. & Erickson, Bruce & Clay, David E. & Clay, Sharon A., 2021. "The Custom Service Industry’s Role in Precision Agriculture Adoption: A Literature Review," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 19(2), December.
    16. Schimmelpfennig, David & Ebel, Robert, 2016. "Sequential Adoption and Cost Savings from Precision Agriculture," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 41(1), pages 1-19, January.
    17. Lambert, Dayton M. & Paudel, Krishna P. & Larson, James A., 2015. "Bundled Adoption of Precision Agriculture Technologies by Cotton Producers," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 40(2), pages 1-21, May.
    18. Griffin, Terry W. & Mark, Tyler B. & Dobbins, Craig L. & Lowenberg-DeBoer, James M., 2014. "Estimating whole farm costs of conducting on-farm research on midwestern US corn and soybean farms: A linear programming approach," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 4(1), October.
    19. Lambert, Dayton M. & English, Burton C. & Harper, David C. & Larkin, Sherry L. & Larson, James A. & Mooney, Daniel F. & Roberts, Roland K. & Velandia, Margarita & Reeves, Jeanne M., 2014. "Adoption and Frequency of Precision Soil Testing in Cotton Production," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 39(1), pages 1-18, April.
    20. Cuong Le Van & Nguyen To The, 2019. "Farmers’ adoption of organic production," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 33-59, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    best practices; European Green Deal; pesticides; inorganic fertilizers; sustainable crop production.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:24:y:2022:i:60:p:525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.