IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adi/ijbess/v3y2021i2p73-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bureaucratic and humanistic management styles and organizational citizenship behavior: A study of divine word college of Laoag

Author

Listed:
  • Damianus Abun

    (School of Business Administration, Divine Word College of Laoag, Ilocos Norte, Philippines)

  • Theogenia Magallanes

    (Saint Benedict College of Northern Luzon, Ilocos Sur, Philippines)

  • Libertine G.R. Macaspac

    (School of Arts, Sciences and Education, Divine Word College of Laoag, Ilocos Norte, Philippines)

  • Artemio P. Seatriz

    (School of Arts, Sciences and Education, Divine Word College of Laoag, Ilocos Norte, Philippines)

  • T. Nicolas Marlene

    (School of Arts, Sciences and Education, Divine Word College of Laoag, Ilocos Norte, Philippines)

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the effect of bureaucratic and humanistic management styles of administrators on the organizational citizenship behaviours of employees. To deepen the study, literature was reviewed and theories were established. The study used a descriptive correlational research design and used questionnaires to gather the data. The study found that the bureaucratic management style is higher than the humanistic management style. The higher the bureaucratic management style, the lower the humanistic management style becomes. Based on the correlational analysis, it found that management styles of administrators correlate to the organizational citizenship behaviours of employees. Therefore, the hypothesis of the study is accepted.

Suggested Citation

  • Damianus Abun & Theogenia Magallanes & Libertine G.R. Macaspac & Artemio P. Seatriz & T. Nicolas Marlene, 2021. "Bureaucratic and humanistic management styles and organizational citizenship behavior: A study of divine word college of Laoag," International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), Bussecon International Academy, vol. 3(2), pages 73-84, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:adi:ijbess:v:3:y:2021:i:2:p:73-84
    DOI: 10.36096/ijbes.v3i2.262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://bussecon.com/ojs/index.php/ijbes/article/view/262/108
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.36096/ijbes.v3i2.262
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.36096/ijbes.v3i2.262?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dorota Grego-Planer, 2019. "The Relationship between Organizational Commitment and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors in the Public and Private Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Damianus Abun & Theogenia Magallanes & Editha B. Acidera & Mary Joy Encarnacion & Carol U. Domingcil, 2021. "Work Environment and work Engagement of Employees of the Catholic Colleges in the Ilocos Region, Philippines," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 19(1), pages 439-464, May.
    3. Rose-Ackerman, Susan, 1986. "Reforming Public Bureaucracy through Economic Incentives?," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 2(1), pages 131-161, Spring.
    4. Robert W. Zmud, 1982. "Diffusion of Modern Software Practices: Influence of Centralization and Formalization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(12), pages 1421-1431, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mahdi Omidi & Qingfei Min & Ali Omidi, 2017. "Multi-level analysis framework for reviewing IDT-based studies," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1339338-133, January.
    2. Laurent Franckx & Isabelle Brose, 2004. "A theoretical framework for incentives in the public sector," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 10(2), pages 1-8.
    3. Lin, Han & Zeng, Saixing & Liu, Haijian & Li, Chao, 2020. "Bridging the gaps or fecklessness? A moderated mediating examination of intermediaries’ effects on corporate innovation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 94.
    4. Damianus Abun & Gladys Jean Q. Basilio & Julian P. Fredolin & Theogenia Magallanes, 2022. "The effect of entrepreneurial mindset, work environment on employees' work performance," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(4), pages 77-94, June.
    5. Cavalluzzo, Ken S. & Ittner, Christopher D., 2004. "Implementing performance measurement innovations: evidence from government," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(3-4), pages 243-267.
    6. Paul, Samuel, 1994. "Does voice matter? : for public accountability, yes," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1388, The World Bank.
    7. Pilar Ficapal-Cusí & Mihaela Enache-Zegheru & Joan Torrent-Sellens, 2020. "Linking Perceived Organizational Support, Affective Commitment, and Knowledge Sharing with Prosocial Organizational Behavior of Altruism and Civic Virtue," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Gosselin, Maurice, 1997. "The effect of strategy and organizational structure on the adoption and implementation of activity-based costing," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 105-122, February.
    9. Pullig, Chris & Maxham, James III & Hair, Joseph Jr., 2002. "Salesforce automation systems: an exploratory examination of organizational factors associated with effective implementation and salesforce productivity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(5), pages 401-415, May.
    10. Raaj Kumar Sah, 1991. "Fallibility in Human Organizations and Political Systems," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 5(2), pages 67-88, Spring.
    11. YoungKi Park & Paul A. Pavlou & Nilesh Saraf, 2020. "Configurations for Achieving Organizational Ambidexterity with Digitization," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 1376-1397, December.
    12. Tzokas, Nikolaos & Hart, Susan & Argouslidis, Paris & Saren, Michael, 2000. "Strategic pricing in export markets: empirical evidence from the UK," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 95-117, February.
    13. Widodo & Chandrawaty, 2021. "Exploring The Principals' Visionary Leaderships' Effect on School Organizational Culture and Teachers' Affective Commitment," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 18(1), pages 21-30, April.
    14. Indounas, Kostis & Roth, Stefan, 2012. "Antecedents and consequences of strategic price management: An analysis in the New Zealand industrial service context," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 113-121.
    15. Duvanova, Dinissa, 2014. "Economic Regulations, Red Tape, and Bureaucratic Corruption in Post-Communist Economies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 298-312.
    16. Imran Rasul & Daniel Rogger, 2018. "Management of Bureaucrats and Public Service Delivery: Evidence from the Nigerian Civil Service," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 128(608), pages 413-446, February.
    17. Makris, Miltiadis, 2009. "Incentives for motivated agents under an administrative constraint," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 428-440, August.
    18. Teng, James TC & Fiedler, Kirk D & Grover, Varun, 1998. "An exploratory study of the influence of the IS function and organizational context on business process reengineering project initiatives," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 679-698, December.
    19. Thakur, Ramendra & Hsu, Sonya H.Y. & Fontenot, Gwen, 2012. "Innovation in healthcare: Issues and future trends," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(4), pages 562-569.
    20. Minoo Ghoreishi & Xiaobo Fang & Anita Nikzad, 2022. "Employees Changing Attitude Toward Work," RAIS Conference Proceedings 2022-2024 0195, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adi:ijbess:v:3:y:2021:i:2:p:73-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibihutr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.