IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v28y2024i31637.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Network as A Strategy to Break Silos and Promote Open Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Aurélio Martins Favarin
  • Cleidson Nogueira Dias
  • Bento Alves da Costa Filho
  • Martha Delphino Bambini

Abstract

Objectives: The central objective of this paper is to propose and test a model for the development of network governance structures to respond to the silo effect in the innovation management process in a large research organization. Method: A case study was used with the objective of building a governance model that could address the problems derived from the silo effect. To achieve the objective, validation workshops were held, with teams being challenged to reflect on the mechanisms and basic rules used to assemble the model. Results: The efforts made to inhibit the silo effect in the organization investigated were successful. Internal events were held to exchange knowledge between research centers, which resulted in greater stimulation of connections between these and other actors throughout the innovation ecosystem. Conclusions: The governance model adopted to mitigate the problems derived from the silo effect proved to be effective in promoting interaction between research centers on issues related to open innovation. The model, supported by mechanisms and basic rules inserted in the key actions, proved to be efficient in promoting a more intense relationship between the research units of the institution studied, resulting in new network actions.

Suggested Citation

  • Aurélio Martins Favarin & Cleidson Nogueira Dias & Bento Alves da Costa Filho & Martha Delphino Bambini, 2024. "Network as A Strategy to Break Silos and Promote Open Innovation," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 28(Vol. 28 N), pages 230241-2302.
    • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:28:y:2024:i:3:1637
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1637
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1637/2005
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Douglas Wegner & Clara Isabel Koetz & Eduardo De Oliveira Wilk, 2013. "Social capital in Brazilian small-firm networks: the influence on business performance," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 20(4), pages 446-461.
    2. Elodie Gardet & Shady Fraiha, 2012. "Coordination Modes Established by the Hub Firm of an Innovation Network: The Case of an SME Bearer," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(2), pages 216-238, April.
    3. Seung Ho Park & Gerardo R. Ungson, 2001. "Interfirm Rivalry and Managerial Complexity: A Conceptual Framework of Alliance Failure," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(1), pages 37-53, February.
    4. Douglas Wegner & Clara Isabel Koetz & Eduardo de Oliveira Wilk, 2013. "Social capital in Brazilian small-firm networks: the influence on business performance," Post-Print hal-04059921, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huynh Thi Minh Chau & Nguyen Manh Tuan & Hang Le Cam Phuong, 2017. "Knowledge sharing in virtual teams: A research in information technology companies in Vietnam," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 7(1), pages 75-88.
    2. Lee, Ho & Kim, Moon Sun & Kim, Kyung Kyu, 2014. "Interorganizational information systems visibility and supply chain performance," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 285-295.
    3. Heimeriks, K. & Duysters, G.M., 2004. "A study into the alliance capability development process," Working Papers 04.21, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies.
    4. Lokshin, Boris & Hagedoorn, John & Letterie, Wilko, 2011. "The bumpy road of technology partnerships: Understanding causes and consequences of partnership mal-functioning," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 297-308, March.
    5. Newburry, William & Zeira, Yoram & Yeheskel, Orly, 2003. "Autonomy and effectiveness of equity international joint ventures (IJVs) in China," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 395-419, August.
    6. Walter, Achim & Auer, Michael & Ritter, Thomas, 2006. "The impact of network capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation on university spin-off performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 541-567, July.
    7. Bérard, Céline & Perez, Marie, 2014. "Alliance dynamics through real options: The case of an alliance between competing pharmaceutical companies," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 337-349.
    8. Abimael Magno Do Ouro Filho & Maria Elena Leon Olave & Ikaro Daniel De Carvalho Barreto, 2015. "Factors that Disrupt Cooperation in Local Productive Arrangements: a Quantitative Study in the Clothing Sector in Tobias Barreto, Sergipe," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 12(5), pages 16-38, September.
    9. Bilal Anwar & Zhongdong Xiao & Sharmin Akter & Ramiz-Ur Rehman, 2017. "Sustainable Urbanization and Development Goals Strategy through Public–Private Partnerships in a South-Asian Metropolis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-26, October.
    10. Qin Yang, 2018. "Geographical Diversity of Alliance Portfolio and Firm Innovation: The Roles of Resource Characteristics and Governance Structures," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(06), pages 1-22, December.
    11. Fabian Reck & Alexander Fliaster & Michael Kolloch, 2022. "How to Build a Network that Facilitates Firm‐level Innovation: An Integration of Structural and Managerial Perspectives," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(4), pages 998-1031, June.
    12. Yu Liu & T. Ravichandran, 2015. "Alliance Experience, IT-Enabled Knowledge Integration, and Ex Ante Value Gains," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 511-530, April.
    13. Maria Benavides-Espinosa & Salvador Roig-Dobón, 2011. "The influence of cultural differences in cooperative learning through joint ventures," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 5(1), pages 69-85, March.
    14. Dai, Ye & Du, Kui & Byun, Gukdo & Zhu, Xi, 2017. "Ambidexterity in new ventures: The impact of new product development alliances and transactive memory systems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 77-85.
    15. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2964 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Akie Iriyama & Weilei Shi & John Prescott, 2014. "Frequency and directional reversal of equity ownership change in international joint ventures," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 215-243, March.
    17. Jae-Seung Han & Sang-Yong Lee, 2013. "The impact of technology transfer contract on a firm’s market value in Korea," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 38(5), pages 651-674, October.
    18. Abdul Azeez Badir Alnidawi & Fatimah Musa Omran, 2016. "Human Resources Management Activities Adopted in the Value Chain Model and their Impact on the Organizational Sustainability-An Empirical Study in the Jordanian Pharmaceutical Companies," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(8), pages 106-117, August.
    19. Cheriet, F., 2010. "L'utilisation des études de cas pour analyser les coopérations inter-entreprises : des justifications méthodologiques au pragmatisme empirique," Working Papers MoISA 201002, UMR MoISA : Montpellier Interdisciplinary center on Sustainable Agri-food systems (social and nutritional sciences): CIHEAM-IAMM, CIRAD, INRAE, L'Institut Agro, Montpellier SupAgro, IRD - Montpellier, France.
    20. Santini, Mateus Augusto Fassina & Faccin, Kadígia & Balestrin, Alsones & Volkmer Martins, Bibiana, 2021. "How the relational structure of universities influences research and development results," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 155-163.
    21. Prothit Sen & Phanish Puranam, 2022. "Do Alliance portfolios encourage or impede new business practice adoption? Theory and evidence from the private equity industry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(11), pages 2279-2312, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:28:y:2024:i:3:1637. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.