IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v27y2023i11544.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of Photography in Organizational Research: Legitimacy and Potential

Author

Listed:
  • Henrique Muzzio

Abstract

Objective: to discuss the use of the photographic method to produce evidence in organizational research and contribute to the debate so that the method achieves greater legitimacy from the nuances that delimit the organizational field. Proposal: present characteristics, approaches of the photographic method, limitations, and possibilities of its application as a means of producing evidence in organizational research with rigor, relevance, accuracy, and impact, discussing practical aspects of photographic analysis and the dilemmas that accompany the researcher in its use. Examples of reflections helpful to researchers when using photographic analysis are also presented. Conclusions: given the restricted use of photography in organizational research, the reduced scope of articles published with photographic analysis, and the potential that the method has to produce evidence, the essay encourages actors in the field to expand the use of photography. Moreover, the article discusses how photography can achieve more significant space among researchers, editors, reviewers, and readers. Given the broad theoretical and methodological scope in which photography can be applied and the contemporary technological facilities, overcoming this reduced use is more related to the need for greater legitimacy of photography by peers than the specifics of the method.

Suggested Citation

  • Henrique Muzzio, 2023. "Use of Photography in Organizational Research: Legitimacy and Potential," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 27(Vol. 27 N), pages 220012-2200.
  • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:27:y:2023:i:1:1544
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1544
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1544/1812
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dustin J. Bluhm & Wendy Harman & Thomas W. Lee & Terence R. Mitchell, 2011. "Qualitative Research in Management: A Decade of Progress," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(8), pages 1866-1891, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Clauss & Ricarda B. Bouncken & Sven Laudien & Sascha Kraus, 2019. "BUSINESS MODEL RECONFIGURATION AND INNOVATION IN SMEs: A MIXED-METHOD ANALYSIS FROM THE ELECTRONICS INDUSTRY," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(02), pages 1-35, April.
    2. Shaw, Sally, 2019. "The chaos of inclusion? Examining anti-homophobia policy development in New Zealand sport," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 247-262.
    3. Yingying Zhang-Zhang & Sylvia Rohlfer & Jay Rajasekera, 2020. "An Eco-Systematic View of Cross-Sector Fintech: The Case of Alibaba and Tencent," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-25, October.
    4. Sharma, Amalesh & Soni, Mauli & Borah, Sourav Bikash & Saboo, Alok R., 2020. "Identifying the drivers of luxury brand sales in emerging markets: An exploratory study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 25-40.
    5. Waldron, Theodore L. & McMullen, Jeffery S. & Petrenko, Oleg V. & Tribble Trudell, Lori & Aronson, Olivia, 2022. "Entrepreneur-investor rivalry over new venture control: The battle for Balcones Distilling," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4).
    6. Lisa-Marie Semke & Victor Tiberius, 2020. "Corporate Foresight and Dynamic Capabilities: An Exploratory Study," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-14, June.
    7. Flowers, Stephen & Meyer, Martin, 2020. "How can entrepreneurs benefit from user knowledge to create innovation in the digital services sector?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 122-130.
    8. David R. Hannah & Kirsten Robertson, 2015. "Why and How Do Employees Break and Bend Confidential Information Protection Rules?," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 381-413, May.
    9. Marco Brand & Victor Tiberius & Peter M. Bican & Alexander Brem, 2021. "Agility as an innovation driver: towards an agile front end of innovation framework," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 157-187, January.
    10. Martina Toni & Maria Francesca Renzi & Laura Di Pietro & Roberta Guglielmetti Mugion & Giovanni Mattia, 2021. "The Relation between Collaborative Consumption and Subjective Well-Being: An Analysis of P2P Accommodation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, May.
    11. Othmar Manfred Lehner & Alex Nicholls & Sarah Beatrice Kapplmüller, 2022. "Arenas of Contestation: A Senian Social Justice Perspective on the Nature of Materiality in Impact Measurement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(4), pages 971-989, September.
    12. Sven M. Laudien & Robin Pesch, 2019. "Understanding the influence of digitalization on service firm business model design: a qualitative-empirical analysis," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 575-587, June.
    13. Cassell, Catherine, 2016. "European qualitative research: A celebration of diversity and a cautionary tale," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 453-456.
    14. Laudien, Sven M. & Reuter, Ute & Sendra Garcia, Francisco Javier & Botella-Carrubi, Dolores, 2024. "Digital advancement and its effect on business model design: Qualitative-empirical insights," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    15. Sven M. Laudien & Birgit Daxböck, 2016. "The Influence Of The Industrial Internet Of Things On Business Model Design: A Qualitative-Empirical Analysis," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(08), pages 1-28, December.
    16. Sven M. Laudien & Birgit Daxböck, 2016. "Path dependence as a barrier to business model change in manufacturing firms: insights from a multiple-case study," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 86(6), pages 611-645, August.
    17. Lutz Preuss & Ralf Barkemeyer & Bimal Arora & Shilpi Banerjee, 2024. "Sensemaking along global supply chains: implications for the ability of the MNE to manage sustainability challenges," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 55(4), pages 492-514, June.
    18. Sundarakani, Balan & Ajaykumar, Aneesh & Gunasekaran, Angappa, 2021. "Big data driven supply chain design and applications for blockchain: An action research using case study approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    19. Runfola, Andrea & Perna, Andrea & Baraldi, Enrico & Gregori, Gian Luca, 2017. "The use of qualitative case studies in top business and management journals: A quantitative analysis of recent patterns," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 116-127.
    20. Kasper, Helmut & Lehrer, Mark & Mühlbacher, Jürgen & Müller, Barbara, 2013. "On the different “worlds” of intra-organizational knowledge management: Understanding idiosyncratic variation in MNC cross-site knowledge-sharing practices," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 326-338.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:27:y:2023:i:1:1544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.