IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/tse/wpaper/29715.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

A Pseudo-Market Approach to Allocation with Priorities

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Aziz, Haris & Brandl, Florian, 2022. "The vigilant eating rule: A general approach for probabilistic economic design with constraints," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 168-187.
  2. Daniel Kornbluth & Alexey Kushnir, 2024. "Undergraduate Course Allocation through Competitive Markets," Papers 2412.05691, arXiv.org.
  3. Josu'e Ortega, 2018. "The Losses from Integration in Matching Markets can be Large," Papers 1810.10287, arXiv.org.
  4. Schlegel, Jan Christoph & Mamageishvili, Akaki, 2020. "Welfare theorems for random assignments with priorities," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 62-81.
  5. Brown, Patrick R. & O’Sullivan, Francis M., 2019. "Shaping photovoltaic array output to align with changing wholesale electricity price profiles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
  6. Gabrielle Fack & Julien Grenet & Yinghua He, 2019. "Beyond Truth-Telling: Preference Estimation with Centralized School Choice and College Admissions," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(4), pages 1486-1529, April.
  7. Julien Combe & Vladyslav Nora & Olivier Tercieux, 2021. "Dynamic assignment without money: Optimality of spot mechanisms," Working Papers 2021-11, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
  8. He, Yinghua & Li, Sanxi & Yan, Jianye, 2015. "Evaluating assignment without transfers: A market perspective," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 40-44.
  9. Jan Christoph Schlegel, 2016. "Ex-Ante Stable Lotteries," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie 16.23, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.
  10. Akyol, Ethem, 2023. "Inefficiency of Random Serial Dictatorship under incomplete information," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
  11. Dasgupta, Sulagna, 2024. "Designing information to improve welfare in matching markets," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 5-16.
  12. Jugal Garg & Thorben Trobst & Vijay V. Vazirani, 2020. "One-Sided Matching Markets with Endowments: Equilibria and Algorithms," Papers 2009.10320, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
  13. Ortega, Josué, 2019. "The losses from integration in matching markets can be large," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 48-51.
  14. Miralles, Antonio & Pycia, Marek, 2021. "Foundations of pseudomarkets: Walrasian equilibria for discrete resources," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
  15. Haris Aziz & Florian Brandl, 2020. "The Vigilant Eating Rule: A General Approach for Probabilistic Economic Design with Constraints," Papers 2008.08991, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
  16. Hashimoto, Tadashi, 2018. "The generalized random priority mechanism with budgets," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 708-733.
  17. Antonio Miralles, 2017. "Ex-ante efficiency in assignments with seniority rights," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 21(1), pages 33-48, March.
  18. Anna Bogomolnaia & Hervé Moulin & Fedor Sandomirskiy & Elena Yanovskaya, 2017. "Competitive Division of a Mixed Manna," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 85(6), pages 1847-1871, November.
  19. Combe, Julien & Nora, Vladyslav & Tercieux, Olivier, 2025. "Dynamic assignment without money: optimality of spot mechanisms," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 20(1), January.
  20. Yusuke Narita, 2018. "Toward an Ethical Experiment," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2127, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
  21. Caterina Calsamiglia & Francisco Martínez-Mora & Antonio Miralles, 2021. "Random assignments and outside options," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 57(3), pages 557-566, October.
  22. Federico Echenique & Antonio Miralles & Jun Zhang, 2021. "Constrained Pseudo-Market Equilibrium," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(11), pages 3699-3732, November.
  23. Caterina Calsamiglia & Francisco Martinez-Mora & Antonio Miralles, 2020. "Cardinal Assignment Mechanisms: Money Matters More than it Should," Working Papers 1150, Barcelona School of Economics.
  24. Yusuke Narita, 2018. "Experiment-as-Market: Incorporating Welfare into Randomized Controlled Trials," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2127r, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, revised May 2019.
  25. Schlegel, J. C. & Mamageishvili, A., 2017. "Welfare theorems for random assignments with priorities," Working Papers 17/05, Department of Economics, City University London.
  26. Grover, Piyush & Babar, Zaheer-Ud-Din & Oehmen, Raoul & Vitry, Agnes, 2018. "Medicines access programs to cancer medicines in Australia and New Zealand: An exploratory study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(3), pages 243-249.
  27. Echenique, Federico & Miralles, Antonio & Zhang, Jun, 2023. "Balanced equilibrium in pseudo-markets with endowments," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 428-443.
  28. Andrea Canidio, 2023. "Auctions with Tokens: Monetary Policy as a Mechanism Design Choice," Papers 2301.13794, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2023.
  29. Ioannis Panageas & Thorben Trobst & Vijay V. Vazirani, 2021. "Time-Efficient Algorithms for Nash-Bargaining-Based Matching Market Models," Papers 2106.02024, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.
  30. Federico Echenique & Antonio Miralles & Jun Zhang, 2018. "Fairness and Efficiency for Probabilistic Allocations with Endowments," Working Papers 1055, Barcelona School of Economics.
  31. Dogan, Mustafa & Uyanik, Metin, 2020. "Welfare maximizing allocation without transfers," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
  32. Fedor Sandomirskiy & Philip Ushchev, 2024. "The geometry of consumer preference aggregation," Papers 2405.06108, arXiv.org.
  33. Schlegel, Jan Christoph, 2018. "A note on ex-ante stable lotteries," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 90-93.
  34. Manjunath, Vikram, 2016. "Fractional matching markets," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 321-336.
  35. Nesterov, Alexander S., 2017. "Fairness and efficiency in strategy-proof object allocation mechanisms," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 145-168.
  36. Schlegel, J. C., 2017. "A Note on Ex-Ante Stable Lotteries," Working Papers 17/06, Department of Economics, City University London.
  37. Jingsheng Yu & Jun Zhang, 2020. "Efficient and fair trading algorithms in market design environments," Papers 2005.06878, arXiv.org, revised May 2021.
  38. Vijay V. Vazirani & Mihalis Yannakakis, 2020. "Computational Complexity of the Hylland-Zeckhauser Scheme for One-Sided Matching Markets," Papers 2004.01348, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2020.
  39. Basteck, Christian, 2018. "Fair solutions to the random assignment problem," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 163-172.
  40. Aram Grigoryan & Markus Möller, 2024. "A Theory of Auditability for Allocation Mechanisms," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 308, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.