IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/tpr/inntgg/v2y2007i3p97-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

The Principles of Distributed Innovation

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Wegner, Douglas & Hölsgens, Rick & Bitencourt, Claudia Cristina, 2023. "Orchestrating collaborative networks for social innovation: Orchestrators' roles in socially innovative initiatives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
  2. Isabelle Liotard & Valérie Revest, 2022. "Open innovation and prizes: is the European Commission really comitted?," CEPN Working Papers hal-03524203, HAL.
  3. Scott, Susan V., 2010. "Understanding the characteristics of techno-innovation in an era of self-regulated financial services," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 37867, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  4. Philipp Tuertscher & Raghu Garud & Arun Kumaraswamy, 2014. "Justification and Interlaced Knowledge at ATLAS, CERN," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 1579-1608, December.
  5. Lingling Qin & Weihong Xie & Peiyi Jia, 2024. "Value Chain Digitalization, Global Value Chain Embeddedness, and Distributed Innovation in Value Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-23, March.
  6. Viktoria Boss & Robin Kleer & Alexander Vossen, 2017. "Walking Parallel Paths Or Taking The Same Road? The Effect Of Collaborative Incentives In Innovation Contests," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(03), pages 1-34, April.
  7. Gabriele Santoro & Alberto Ferraris & Elisa Giacosa & Guido Giovando, 2018. "How SMEs Engage in Open Innovation: a Survey," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 9(2), pages 561-574, June.
  8. Ofer Arazy & Johannes Daxenberger & Hila Lifshitz-Assaf & Oded Nov & Iryna Gurevych, 2016. "Turbulent Stability of Emergent Roles: The Dualistic Nature of Self-Organizing Knowledge Coproduction," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 792-812, December.
  9. Maria Roszkowska-Menkes, 2017. "User Innovation: State of the Art and Perspectives for Future Research," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 13(2), pages 127-154.
  10. Powell, Walter W. & Giannella, Eric, 2010. "Collective Invention and Inventor Networks," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 575-605, Elsevier.
  11. Aljona Zorina & William H. Dutton, 2021. "Theorizing Actor Interactions Shaping Innovation in Digital Infrastructures: The Case of Residential Internet Development in Belarus," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(1), pages 156-180, January.
  12. Gafari Lukumon & Mark Klein, 2023. "Crowd-sourced idea filtering with Bag of Lemons: the impact of the token budget size," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 50(2), pages 205-219, June.
  13. Kubiak Katarzyna & Wziątek-Kubiak Anna, 2019. "Business models innovation based on crowds: a comparative study," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 55(2), pages 127-147, June.
  14. Prpić, John & Shukla, Prashant P. & Kietzmann, Jan H. & McCarthy, Ian P., 2015. "How to work a crowd: Developing crowd capital through crowdsourcing," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 77-85.
  15. Henri Simula & Mervi Vuori, 2012. "Benefits And Barriers Of Crowdsourcing In B2b Firms: Generating Ideas With Internal And External Crowds," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(06), pages 1-19.
  16. Smirnova, Inna & Reitzig, Markus & Alexy, Oliver, 2022. "What makes the right OSS contributor tick? Treatments to motivate high-skilled developers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
  17. Rullani, Francesco & Haefliger, Stefan, 2013. "The periphery on stage: The intra-organizational dynamics in online communities of creation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 941-953.
  18. Yasser Alizadeh & Antonie J. Jetter, 2019. "Pathways for Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Innovations: A Review and Expansion of Ambidexterity Theory," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(05), pages 1-33, August.
  19. Prpić, John, 2017. "A Geography of Participation in IT-Mediated Crowds," SocArXiv a7k27, Center for Open Science.
  20. Cynthia Weiyi Cai & Jennifer Gippel & Yushu Zhu & Abhay Kumar Singh, 2019. "The power of crowds: Grand challenges in the Asia-Pacific region," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 44(4), pages 551-570, November.
  21. Mróz-Gorgoń Barbara & Szymański Grzegorz, 2018. "The Impact of the Ropo Effect in the Clothing Industry," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 4(3), pages 24-35, July.
  22. Julia Bauer & Nikolaus Franke & Philipp Tuertscher, 2016. "Intellectual Property Norms in Online Communities: How User-Organized Intellectual Property Regulation Supports Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 724-750, December.
  23. Ram Bala & Kumar R. Sarangee & Shuhan He & Grace Jin, 2022. "Get Us PPE: A Self-Organizing Platform Ecosystem for Supply Chain Optimization during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-16, March.
  24. Bengtsson, Lars & Ryzhkova, Natalia, 2013. "Managing a strategic source of innovation: Online users," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 655-662.
  25. Peter Svensson & Lars Bengtsson, 2010. "Users' Influence in Social-service Innovations: Two Swedish Case Studies," Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 190-212, October.
  26. Isabelle Liotard, 2012. "Les plateformes d'innovation sur Internet : arrangements contractuels, intermédiation et gestion de la propriété intellectuelle," Post-Print hal-00680366, HAL.
  27. Isabelle Liotard & Valérie Revest, 2015. "Innocentive Un modèle hybride d'innovation basé sur l'appel à la foule et l'Innovation Ouverte," Post-Print halshs-01302451, HAL.
  28. Prpić, John, 2017. "How To Work A Crowd: Developing Crowd Capital Through Crowdsourcing," SocArXiv jer9k, Center for Open Science.
  29. Ben Robaeyst & Bastiaan Baccarne & Wout Duthoo & Dimitri Schuurman, 2021. "The City as an Experimental Environment: The Identification, Selection, and Activation of Distributed Knowledge in Regional Open Innovation Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, June.
  30. Isabelle Liotard & Valérie Revest, 2022. "Open innovation and prizes: is the European Commission really comitted?," Working Papers hal-03524203, HAL.
  31. Lars BENGTSSON & Natalia RYZHKOVA, 2013. "Managing Online Users in Open Innovation: The Case of a Nordic Telecom Company," Communications & Strategies, IDATE, Com&Strat dept., vol. 1(89), pages 37-53, 1st quart.
  32. Prpić, John, 2017. "Experiments on Crowdsourcing Policy Assessment," SocArXiv qznpk, Center for Open Science.
  33. Isabelle Liotard & Valerie Revest, 2021. "Open innovation and prizes: is the European Commission really committed?," LEM Papers Series 2021/14, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
  34. Nikolaus Franke & Peter Keinz & Katharina Klausberger, 2013. "“Does This Sound Like a Fair Deal?”: Antecedents and Consequences of Fairness Expectations in the Individual’s Decision to Participate in Firm Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 1495-1516, October.
  35. Chenhui (Julian) Guo & Tae Hun Kim & Anjana Susarla & Vallabh Sambamurthy, 2020. "Understanding Content Contribution Behavior in a Geosegmented Mobile Virtual Community: The Context of Waze," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 1398-1420, December.
  36. Ommen, Nils O. & Blut, Markus & Backhaus, Christof & Woisetschläger, David M., 2016. "Toward a better understanding of stakeholder participation in the service innovation process: More than one path to success," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 2409-2416.
  37. Julien Pénin, 2008. "More open than open innovation? Rethinking the concept of openness in innovation studies," Working Papers of BETA 2008-18, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
  38. Yoshiaki Fukami, 2021. "Open and Clarified Process of Compatibility Standards for Promoting Data Exchange," The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 535-555, November.
  39. Jiao, Yuanyuan & Wu, Yepeng & Lu, Steven, 2021. "The role of crowdsourcing in product design: The moderating effect of user expertise and network connectivity," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
  40. Prpić, John, 2017. "Crowd Science: Measurements, Models, and Methods," SocArXiv ujx8j, Center for Open Science.
  41. Täuscher, Karl, 2017. "Leveraging collective intelligence: How to design and manage crowd-based business models," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 237-245.
  42. Katharina Fellnhofer, 2017. "Facilitating entrepreneurial discovery in smart specialisation via stakeholder participation within online mechanisms for knowledge-based policy advice," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1296802-129, January.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.