IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/taf/pubmgr/v8y2006i4p493-501.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Jacob Torfing & Eva Sørensen, 2019. "Interactive Political Leadership in Theory and Practice: How Elected Politicians May Benefit from Co-Creating Public Value Outcomes," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-18, July.
  2. Bobby Macaulay, 2016. "Considering social enterprise involvement in the commissioning of health services in Shetland," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 31(5), pages 650-659, August.
  3. Benjamin FRIEDLÄNDER & Christina SCHAEFER, 2022. "Co-production of Public Goods in Shrinking Rural Regions in Germany: Why Does Public Action Still Matter?," CIRIEC Studies Series, in: Philippe BANCE & Marie-J. BOUCHARD & Dorothea GREILING & CIRIEC (ed.), New perspectives in the co-production of public policies, public services and common goods, volume 3, chapter 6, pages 125-142, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
  4. John Hagedoorn & Helen Haugh & Paul Robson & Kate Sugar, 2023. "Social innovation, goal orientation, and openness: insights from social enterprise hybrids," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 173-198, January.
  5. Manila Bonciani & Ilaria Corazza & Sabina Rosis, 2022. "The COVID-19 emergency as an opportunity to co-produce an innovative approach to health services provision: the women's antenatal classes move on the web," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2022(1), pages 59-85, March.
  6. Andrea BASSI & Alessandro FABBR, 2022. "Co-production paradigm: Threat or Opportunity for Social Economy?," CIRIEC Studies Series, in: Philippe BANCE & Marie-J. BOUCHARD & Dorothea GREILING & CIRIEC (ed.), New perspectives in the co-production of public policies, public services and common goods, volume 3, chapter 5, pages 99-123, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
  7. Qiaoyan Lin & Qiang Mai, 2018. "How to Improve New Generation Migrant Workers’ Entrepreneurial Willingness—A Moderated Mediation Examination from the Sustainable Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-13, May.
  8. Vrangbæk, Karsten & Scheele, Christian Elling & Kriegbaum, Margit, 2018. "Voluntary associations and co-production of health promoting activities for older adults: Experiences and policy lessons from Denmark," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(11), pages 1255-1259.
  9. Fabian Hattke & Janne Kalucza, 2019. "What influences the willingness of citizens to coproduce public services? Results from a vignette experiment," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 2(1).
  10. Edward McPhail & Vlad Tarko, 2017. "The evolution of governance structures in a polycentric system," Chapters, in: Morris Altman (ed.), Handbook of Behavioural Economics and Smart Decision-Making, chapter 16, pages 290-314, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  11. Gabriela Vaceková & Mária Svidroòová, 2012. "The non-government organizations in Slovakia and Austria and the current state of their self-financing," MUNI ECON Working Papers 06, Masaryk University, revised Mar 2013.
  12. Turcotte, I. & Gómez, G.M., 2012. "Linking the poor to new modalities in service delivery. Partnership innovations in solid waste management in Bogotá, Colombia," ISS Working Papers - General Series 548, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
  13. Weaver, Miles W & Crossan, Kenny & Tan, Hock B & Paxton, Steven E, 2018. "A systems approach to understanding the perspectives in the changing landscape of responsible business in Scotland," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(3), pages 1149-1167.
  14. McMullin, Caitlin, 2018. "Co-production and the third sector: A comparative study of England and France," Thesis Commons 578d3, Center for Open Science.
  15. Noella Edelmann & Ines Mergel, 2021. "Co-Production of Digital Public Services in Austrian Public Administrations," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, February.
  16. Florence JANY-CATRICE, 2020. "Une économie politique des mesures d’impact social," CIRIEC Working Papers 2014, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
  17. Philippe BANCE & Marie-J. BOUCHARD & Dorothea GREILING (ed.), 2022. "New perspectives in the co-production of public policies, public services and common goods," CIRIEC Studies Series, CIRIEC - Université de Liège, volume 3, number css3.
  18. Adam Fforde, 2022. "Understanding how systemic change happens -marketisation and de-marketisation," Post-Print hal-03677990, HAL.
  19. Floriana Fusco & Marta Marsilio & Chiara Guglielmetti, 2018. "La co-production in sanit?: un?analisi bibliometrica," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(108), pages 35-54.
  20. Gabriela Vaceková, 2012. "Current state of utilization of financial controlling in the conditions of non-profit organizations in the Slovak Republic," MUNI ECON Working Papers 07, Masaryk University, revised Mar 2013.
  21. Karen Johnston, 2015. "Public governance: the government of non-state actors in 'partnerships'," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 15-22, January.
  22. Adam Fforde, 2022. "Understanding how systemic change happens - marketisation and de-marketisation," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 15(1), pages 62-94.
  23. Philippe BANCE & Marie-J. BOUCHARD & Dorothea GREILING, 2022. "Conclusions and Directions for further Research," CIRIEC Studies Series, in: Philippe BANCE & Marie-J. BOUCHARD & Dorothea GREILING & CIRIEC (ed.), New perspectives in the co-production of public policies, public services and common goods, volume 3, chapter 0, pages 259-274, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
  24. Tsai, Juin-Ming & Hung, Shiu-Wan & Yang, Ting-Ting, 2020. "In pursuit of goodwill? The cross-level effects of social enterprise consumer behaviours," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 350-361.
  25. Lorenzo Dorigo & Giuseppe Marcon, 2014. "A caring interpretation of stakeholder management for the social enterprise. Evidence from a regional survey of micro social cooperatives in the Italian welfare mix," Working Papers 01, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
  26. Felix Arrieta & Ainhoa Izaguirre & Martín Zuñiga, 2020. "New Spaces In The Public Arena: Learnings From Gipuzkoa," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 6, pages 118-132.
  27. Holstenkamp, Lars, 2019. "What do we know about cooperative sustainable electrification in the global South? A synthesis of the literature and refined social-ecological systems framework," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 307-320.
  28. Cristina Campanale & Sara Giovanna Mauro & Alessandro Sancino, 2021. "Managing co-production and enhancing good governance principles: insights from two case studies," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(1), pages 275-306, March.
  29. Jinpeng Wu & Jing Xiong, 2022. "How Governance Tools Facilitate Citizen Co-Production Behavior in Urban Community Micro-Regeneration: Evidence from Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
  30. Mihaly HOGYE, 2010. "Some Reflections On Nonprofit Finance Theory – Case Of Co-Management And Co-Production Ii," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 41, pages 138-147, June.
  31. Holanda Bruna de Morais & Mendonça Patricia Maria Emerenciano de, 2024. "Analytical Lens for Investigating CSOs and State Relations: The Contributions of Coproduction and Institutional Logics Perspectives," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 15(1), pages 27-47, January.
  32. Holstenkamp, Lars & Degenhart, Heinrich, 2013. "Bürgerbeteiligungsmodelle für erneuerbare Energien - Eine Begriffsbestimmung aus finanzwirtschaftlicher Perspektive [Citizen Participation Schemes for Renewable Energies - A Definition from a Finan," MPRA Paper 81263, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  33. Gazley Beth & Cheng Yuan (Daniel) & Lafontant Chantalle, 2018. "Charitable Support for U.S. National and State Parks Through the Lens of Coproduction and Government Failure Theories," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, December.
  34. Goodwin, Geoff, 2019. "The problem and promise of coproduction: Politics, history, and autonomy," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 501-513.
  35. Roy, Michael J. & Donaldson, Cam & Baker, Rachel & Kerr, Susan, 2014. "The potential of social enterprise to enhance health and well-being: A model and systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 182-193.
  36. Nathalie Vallet & Michelle Bylemans & Simon De Nys-Ketels, 2017. "An innovative concept on inclusive economic participation: The governance of inclusive economic participation sites in Flemish cities," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 32(8), pages 818-834, December.
  37. Wolsink, Maarten, 2020. "Distributed energy systems as common goods: Socio-political acceptance of renewables in intelligent microgrids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
  38. Imke Lammers & Thomas Hoppe, 2018. "Analysing the Institutional Setting of Local Renewable Energy Planning and Implementation in the EU: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, September.
  39. Kate Mclaughlin & Stephen P. Osborne & Celine Chew, 2009. "Relationship marketing, relational capital and the future of marketing in public service organizations," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 35-42, January.
  40. Alessandro Piperno & Christian Iaione & Luna Kappler, 2023. "Institutional Collective Actions for Culture and Heritage-Led Urban Regeneration: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, May.
  41. Aligica, Paul Dragos & Tarko, Vlad, 2013. "Co-Production, Polycentricity, and Value Heterogeneity: The Ostroms’ Public Choice Institutionalism Revisited," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 107(4), pages 726-741, November.
  42. Luigi Corvo & Lavinia Pastore & Marco Mastrodascio & Luca Tricarico, 2022. "The Impact of COVID-19 on Public/Third-Sector Collaboration in the Italian Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
  43. Giuseppe Marcon & Lorenzo Dorigo, 2012. "Stakeholder theory and care management: An inquiry into social enterprises," Working Papers 21, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
  44. Annette Quayle & Johanne Grosvold & Larelle Chapple, 2019. "New modes of managing grand challenges: Cross-sector collaboration and the refugee crisis of the Asia Pacific," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 44(4), pages 665-686, November.
  45. Aksel Ersoy, 2016. "The spread of coproduction: How the concept reached the northernmost city in the UK," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 31(3), pages 410-423, May.
  46. Stefano Landi & Salvatore Russo, 2019. "Co-production as an interpretative framework in the creation of value in public services," Working Papers 01, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.