IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/spr/sochwe/v36y2011i2p267-303.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

A new monotonic, clone-independent, reversal symmetric, and condorcet-consistent single-winner election method

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Rosa Camps & Xavier Mora & Laia Saumell, 2012. "A continuous rating method for preferential voting: the complete case," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 39(1), pages 141-170, June.
  2. Lirong Xia, 2022. "The Impact of a Coalition: Assessing the Likelihood of Voter Influence in Large Elections," Papers 2202.06411, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
  3. Z. Emel Öztürk, 2020. "Consistency of scoring rules: a reinvestigation of composition-consistency," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 49(3), pages 801-831, September.
  4. Raúl Pérez-Fernández & Bernard De Baets, 2018. "The supercovering relation, the pairwise winner, and more missing links between Borda and Condorcet," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 50(2), pages 329-352, February.
  5. Wesley H. Holliday & Eric Pacuit, 2020. "Axioms for Defeat in Democratic Elections," Papers 2008.08451, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
  6. Wesley H. Holliday & Mikayla Kelley, 2021. "Escaping Arrow's Theorem: The Advantage-Standard Model," Papers 2108.01134, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.
  7. Aleksei Y. Kondratev & Alexander S. Nesterov, 2020. "Measuring majority power and veto power of voting rules," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 183(1), pages 187-210, April.
  8. Siamak F. Shahandashti, 2016. "Electoral Systems Used around the World," Papers 1605.01343, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2016.
  9. David Kempe, 2019. "An Analysis Framework for Metric Voting based on LP Duality," Papers 1911.07162, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2019.
  10. Daniela Bubboloni & Mostapha Diss & Michele Gori, 2020. "Extensions of the Simpson voting rule to the committee selection setting," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 183(1), pages 151-185, April.
  11. Lirong Xia, 2020. "How Likely Are Large Elections Tied?," Papers 2011.03791, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
  12. Harrison-Trainor, Matthew, 2022. "An analysis of random elections with large numbers of voters," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 68-84.
  13. Charles T. Munger, 2023. "The best Condorcet-compatible election method: Ranked Pairs," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 434-444, September.
  14. Aleksei Yu. Kondratev & Alexander S. Nesterov, 2018. "Measuring Majority Tyranny: Axiomatic Approach," HSE Working papers WP BRP 194/EC/2018, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
  15. Holliday, Wesley H., 2024. "An impossibility theorem concerning positive involvement in voting," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
  16. Hans Gersbach & Rodrigo Casado Noguerales & Samuel Schenk, 2024. "A Better Cycle-Breaker for Swiss Democracy?," CESifo Working Paper Series 11265, CESifo.
  17. Lê Nguyên Hoang, 2017. "Strategy-proofness of the randomized Condorcet voting system," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 48(3), pages 679-701, March.
  18. García-Lapresta, José Luis & Martínez-Panero, Miguel, 2024. "Two characterizations of the dense rank," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
  19. Rosa Camps & Xavier Mora & Laia Saumell, 2013. "A continuous rating method for preferential voting. The incomplete case," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 40(4), pages 1111-1142, April.
  20. Wesley H. Holliday & Chase Norman & Eric Pacuit & Saam Zahedian, 2022. "Impossibility theorems involving weakenings of expansion consistency and resoluteness in voting," Papers 2208.06907, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
  21. Wesley H. Holliday, 2024. "An impossibility theorem concerning positive involvement in voting," Papers 2401.05657, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
  22. Lirong Xia, 2022. "Most Equitable Voting Rules," Papers 2205.14838, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2023.
  23. Wesley H. Holliday & Eric Pacuit, 2021. "Measuring Violations of Positive Involvement in Voting," Papers 2106.11502, arXiv.org.
  24. Wesley H. Holliday & Eric Pacuit, 2021. "Axioms for defeat in democratic elections," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 33(4), pages 475-524, October.
  25. Yasunori Okumura, 2023. "Consistent Linear Orders for Supermajority Rules," Papers 2304.09419, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
  26. Wesley H. Holliday & Eric Pacuit, 2023. "Stable Voting," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 421-433, September.
  27. Matthew Harrison-Trainor, 2020. "An Analysis of Random Elections with Large Numbers of Voters," Papers 2009.02979, arXiv.org.
  28. Yifeng Ding & Wesley H. Holliday & Eric Pacuit, 2022. "An Axiomatic Characterization of Split Cycle," Papers 2210.12503, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.
  29. Markus Schulze, 2024. "Comment on "The case for minimax‑TD"," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 437-438, September.
  30. Hiroki Saitoh, 2022. "Characterization of tie-breaking plurality rules," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 59(1), pages 139-173, July.
  31. François Durand, 2023. "Coalitional manipulation of voting rules: simulations on empirical data," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 390-409, September.
  32. Daniela Bubboloni & Michele Gori, 2018. "The flow network method," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 51(4), pages 621-656, December.
  33. Michele Gori, 2023. "Families of abstract decision problems whose admissible sets intersect in a singleton," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 61(1), pages 131-154, July.
  34. Felix Brandt & Chris Dong, 2022. "On Locally Rationalizable Social Choice Functions," Papers 2204.05062, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
  35. Tayyebi, Javad & Mitra, Ankan & Sefair, Jorge A., 2023. "The continuous maximum capacity path interdiction problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(1), pages 38-52.
  36. Wesley H. Holliday & Eric Pacuit, 2020. "Split Cycle: A New Condorcet Consistent Voting Method Independent of Clones and Immune to Spoilers," Papers 2004.02350, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
  37. Wesley H. Holliday & Eric Pacuit, 2023. "Split Cycle: a new Condorcet-consistent voting method independent of clones and immune to spoilers," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 197(1), pages 1-62, October.
  38. Rico, Noelia & Vela, Camino R. & Díaz, Irene, 2023. "Reducing the time required to find the Kemeny ranking by exploiting a necessary condition for being a winner," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 1323-1336.
  39. Akira Okada & Ryoji Sawa, 2016. "An evolutionary approach to social choice problems with q-quota rules," KIER Working Papers 936, Kyoto University, Institute of Economic Research.
  40. Wesley H. Holliday & Eric Pacuit, 2023. "An extension of May's Theorem to three alternatives: axiomatizing Minimax voting," Papers 2312.14256, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2024.
  41. Lirong Xia, 2021. "The Smoothed Satisfaction of Voting Axioms," Papers 2106.01947, arXiv.org.
  42. Wesley H. Holliday & Eric Pacuit, 2021. "Stable Voting," Papers 2108.00542, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2023.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.