IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/hal/journl/halshs-00754423.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

The Coalitional Nash Bargaining Solution

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Chander, Parkash & Wooders, Myrna, 2020. "Subgame-perfect cooperation in an extensive game," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
  2. Roberto Burguet & Ramon Caminal, 2015. "Bargaining Failures And Merger Policy," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 56(3), pages 1019-1041, August.
  3. Mathilde Lebrand, 2016. "Profit Shifting and FDI Restrictions," CESifo Working Paper Series 5885, CESifo.
  4. Philippe Jehiel & Laurent Lamy, 2018. "A Mechanism Design Approach to the Tiebout Hypothesis," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 126(2), pages 735-760.
  5. Dietzenbacher, Bas, 2019. "The Procedural Egalitarian Solution and Egalitarian Stable Games," Other publications TiSEM 6caea8c0-1dcd-4038-88da-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
  6. Markus K Brunnermeier & Michael Sockin & Wei Xiong, 2022. "China’s Model of Managing the Financial System," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 89(6), pages 3115-3153.
  7. Okada, Akira, 2011. "Coalitional bargaining games with random proposers: Theory and application," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 227-235, September.
  8. Roberto Serrano, 2021. "Sixty-seven years of the Nash program: time for retirement?," SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 12(1), pages 35-48, March.
  9. Elard, Ilaf, 2020. "Three-player sovereign debt negotiations," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 217-240.
  10. Dietzenbacher, Bas, 2020. "Monotonicity and Egalitarianism (revision of CentER DP 2019-007)," Other publications TiSEM 295f156e-91ad-4177-b61a-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
  11. Chaturvedi, Rakesh, 2016. "Efficient coalitional bargaining with noncontingent offers," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 125-141.
  12. Kim, Chulyoung & Kim, Sang-Hyun & Lee, Jinhyuk & Lee, Joosung, 2022. "Strategic alliances in a veto game: An experimental study," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
  13. Boonen, Tim J. & De Waegenaere, Anja & Norde, Henk, 2017. "Redistribution of longevity risk: The effect of heterogeneous mortality beliefs," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 175-188.
  14. Jens Gudmundsson & Jens Leth Hougaard, 2020. "Enabling reciprocity through blockchain design," IFRO Working Paper 2020/14, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics, revised 09 Feb 2021.
  15. Marco Rogna, 2022. "The Burning Coalition Bargaining Model," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 59(3), pages 735-768, October.
  16. Brangewitz, Sonja & Gamp, Jan-Philip, 2016. "Inner Core, Asymmetric Nash Bargaining Solutions and Competitive Payoffs," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 453, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
  17. Boonen, T.J. & De Waegenaere, A.M.B. & Norde, H.W., 2012. "Bargaining for Over-The Counter Risk Redistributions : The Case of Longevity Risk," Discussion Paper 2012-090, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  18. Akira Okada, 2014. "The stationary equilibrium of three-person coalitional bargaining games with random proposers: a classification," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 43(4), pages 953-973, November.
  19. Venkat Venkatasubramanian & Yu Luo, 2018. "How much income inequality is fair? Nash bargaining solution and its connection to entropy," Papers 1806.05262, arXiv.org.
  20. Ray, Debraj & Vohra, Rajiv, 2015. "Coalition Formation," Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications,, Elsevier.
  21. Joosung Lee, 2013. "Bargaining and Buyout," 2013 Papers ple701, Job Market Papers.
  22. David Gaddis Ross, 2018. "Using cooperative game theory to contribute to strategy research," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(11), pages 2859-2876, November.
  23. Sawa, Ryoji, 2019. "Stochastic stability under logit choice in coalitional bargaining problems," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 633-650.
  24. Brangewitz, Sonja & Gamp, Jan-Philip, 2013. "Asymmetric Nash bargaining solutions and competitive payoffs," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 224-227.
  25. Boonen, T.J. & De Waegenaere, A.M.B. & Norde, H.W., 2012. "Bargaining for Over-The Counter Risk Redistributions : The Case of Longevity Risk," Other publications TiSEM 666aa6f1-2d07-413c-90da-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
  26. Nieva, Ricardo, 2015. "The Coalitional Nash Bargaining Solution with Simultaneous Payoff Demands," Climate Change and Sustainable Development 206838, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
  27. William Thomson, 2022. "On the axiomatic theory of bargaining: a survey of recent results," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(4), pages 491-542, December.
  28. Debraj Ray & Rajiv Vohra, 2024. "Nash Bargaining with Coalitional Threats," Working Papers 2024-001, Brown University, Department of Economics.
  29. Roberto Burguet and Ramon Caminal, 2010. "Simultaneous Nash Bargaining with Consistent Beliefs," Working Papers 521, Barcelona School of Economics.
  30. Akira Okada, 2015. "Cooperation and Institution in Games," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 66(1), pages 1-32, March.
  31. Gomes, Armando, 2022. "Coalitional bargaining games: A new concept of value and coalition formation," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 463-477.
  32. Burguet, Roberto & Caminal, Ramon, 2020. "Coalitional bargaining with consistent counterfactuals," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
  33. Dietzenbacher, Bas, 2020. "Monotonicity and Egalitarianism (revision of CentER DP 2019-007)," Other publications TiSEM 295f156e-91ad-4177-b61a-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
  34. Markus K. Brunnermeier & Michael Sockin & Wei Xiong, 2020. "China’s Model of Managing the Financial System," Working Papers 2020-45, Princeton University. Economics Department..
  35. Achim Voss & Mark Schopf, 2018. "Special interest politics: Contribution schedules vs. Nash bargaining," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 256-273, July.
  36. Achim Voss & Mark Schopf, 2016. "Special Interest Politics: Contribution Schedules versus Nash Bargaining," Working Papers Dissertations 27, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
  37. Okada, Akira & 岡田, 章, 2012. "The Stationary Equilibrium of Three-Person Cooperative Games: A Classification," Discussion Papers 2012-06, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University.
  38. Dietzenbacher, Bas, 2019. "The Procedural Egalitarian Solution and Egalitarian Stable Games," Other publications TiSEM 6caea8c0-1dcd-4038-88da-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
  39. Britz, Volker & Herings, P. Jean-Jacques & Predtetchinski, Arkadi, 2015. "Delay, multiplicity, and non-existence of equilibrium in unanimity bargaining games," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 192-202.
  40. Parkash Chander & Myrna Wooders, 2016. "The Subgame Perfect Core," Vanderbilt University Department of Economics Working Papers 16-00006, Vanderbilt University Department of Economics.
  41. Armando Gomes & Wilfredo Maldonado, 2020. "Mergers and acquisitions with conditional and unconditional offers," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 49(3), pages 773-800, September.
  42. Dietzenbacher, Bas, 2021. "Monotonicity and egalitarianism," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 194-205.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.