IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/cup/intorg/v36y1982i02p299-324_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

Coordination and collaboration: regimes in an anarchic world

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Bernhard Reinsberg & Centre for Business Research, 2018. "Blockchain Technology and International Relations: Decentralised Solutions To Foster Cooperation In An Anarchic World?," Working Papers wp508, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
  2. GAOMBALET, Célestin Guy-Serge, 2020. "Puissance et Coopération dans les Relations économiques internationales [Power and cooperation in international economic relations]," MPRA Paper 100072, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 30 Apr 2020.
  3. Keck, Alexander & Schropp, Simon, 2007. "Indisputably essential: The economics of dispute settlement institutions in trade agreements," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2007-02, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
  4. Tanja A. Börzel, 2011. "Comparative Regionalism - A New Research Agenda," KFG Working Papers p0028, Free University Berlin.
  5. Valerie Freeland, 2015. "Rebranding the State: Uganda's Strategic Use of the International Criminal Court," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 46(2), pages 293-319, March.
  6. Sebastian Krapohl & Václav Ocelík & Dawid M. Walentek, 2021. "The instability of globalization: applying evolutionary game theory to global trade cooperation," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 188(1), pages 31-51, July.
  7. Frank M Häge, 2020. "Allocating political attention in the EU’s foreign and security policy: The effect of supranational agenda-setters," European Union Politics, , vol. 21(4), pages 634-656, December.
  8. Genschel, Philipp & Werle, Raymund, 1992. "From National Hierarchies to International Standardization: Historical and Modal Changes in the Coordination of Telecommunications," MPIfG Discussion Paper 92/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
  9. Schneider, Volker & Werle, Raymund, 1988. "Regime oder korporativer Akteur? Die EG in der Telekommunikationspolitik," MPIfG Discussion Paper 88/4, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
  10. Catherine Figuière & Laëtitia Guilhot, 2010. "L'Asie d'une crise à l'autre : l'impact sur l'intégration régionale," Post-Print halshs-00493869, HAL.
  11. Kenneth W. Abbott & Duncan Snidal, 1998. "Why States Act through Formal International Organizations," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 42(1), pages 3-32, February.
  12. Kenneth W. Abbott & Benjamin Faude, 2022. "Hybrid institutional complexes in global governance," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 263-291, April.
  13. David L. Rousseau, 2002. "Motivations for Choice," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 46(3), pages 394-426, June.
  14. Zürn, Michael, 1993. "Problematic social situations and international institutions: on the use of game theory in international politics," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 63-84.
  15. Rajnish Saryal, 2015. "Global Environmental Agenda: The Neoliberal Institutional Perspective," Jadavpur Journal of International Relations, , vol. 19(1), pages 1-21, June.
  16. William Phelan, 2008. "Why do EU Member States Offer a 'Constitutional' Obedience to EU Obligations? Encompassing Domestic Institutions and Costly International Obligations," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series iiisdp256, IIIS.
  17. Ronald B. Mitchell, 1994. "9. Heterogeneities at Two Levels: States, Non-State Actors and Intentional Oil Pollution," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 6(4), pages 625-653, October.
  18. Oran Young, 2003. "Environmental Governance: The Role of Institutions in Causing and Confronting Environmental Problems," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 377-393, December.
  19. Michael D. McGinnis, 1986. "Issue Linkage and the Evolution of International Cooperation," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 30(1), pages 141-170, March.
  20. Lisa L. Martin, 1994. "4. Heterogeneity, Linkage and Commons Problems," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 6(4), pages 473-493, October.
  21. Eric Reinhardt, 2001. "Adjudication without Enforcement in GATT Disputes," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 45(2), pages 174-195, April.
  22. Duncan Snidal, 1994. "3. The Politics of Scope: Endogenous Actors, Heterogeneity and Institutions," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 6(4), pages 449-472, October.
  23. Sang-Gab Lee, 2005. "Theoretical Review: Neo-Liberal Institutionalism and the Co-Operative Security Regime in Northeast Asia," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 8(1), pages 103-127, March.
  24. Hugh Ward, 1989. "Testing the Waters," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 33(2), pages 274-308, June.
  25. Kaewkamol Pitakdumrongkit, 2017. "Beyond The Secretariat: Addressing Governance Issues In Asean Economic Community," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 62(03), pages 741-759, June.
  26. Abbott, Kenneth W. & Faude, Benjamin, 2022. "Hybrid institutional complexes in global governance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 109882, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  27. Hugh Ward, 1993. "Game Theory and the Politics of the Global Commons," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 37(2), pages 203-235, June.
  28. Oran Young, 2001. "The Behavioral Effects of Environmental Regimes: Collective-Action vs. Social-Practice Models," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 9-29, January.
  29. Remi Maier-Rigaud, 2008. "International Organizations as Corporate Actors: Agency and Emergence in Theories of International Relations," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2008_07, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
  30. Werle, Raymund, 2000. "Institutional aspects of standardization: Jurisdictional conflicts and choice of standardization organizations," MPIfG Discussion Paper 00/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
  31. Mark Irving Lichbach, 1990. "When Is an Arms Rivalry a Prisoner's Dilemma?," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 34(1), pages 29-56, March.
  32. Simon Schropp, 2007. "Revisiting the "Compliance-vs.-Rebalancing" Debate in WTO Scholarship a Unified Research Agenda," IHEID Working Papers 29-2007, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies, revised Dec 2007.
  33. Lajtos, Ildikó, 2010. "Verhandlungsverhalten und Anspruchsanpassung im internationalen Verhandlungsprozess: Die WTO-Agrarverhandlungen zum Abbau exportwettbewerbsfördernder Maßnahmen," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 55, number 94723, September.
  34. Pierre Berthaud & Tancrède Voituriez, 2013. "BASIC effect on global climate governance. Power changes and regime shifts," Post-Print halshs-00868468, HAL.
  35. Marianne Beisheim & Sabine Campe, 2012. "Transnational Public–Private Partnerships' Performance in Water Governance: Institutional Design Matters," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 30(4), pages 627-642, August.
  36. Leonardo Baccini & Johannes Urpelainen, 2014. "Before ratification: understanding the timing of international treaty effects on domestic policies," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 50278, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  37. Michael C. Horowitz & Paul Poast & Allan C. Stam, 2017. "Domestic Signaling of Commitment Credibility," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 61(8), pages 1682-1710, September.
  38. Sebastian Krapohl & Alexandra Vasileva-Dienes, 2020. "The region that isn't: China, Russia and the failure of regional integration in Central Asia," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 347-366, September.
  39. Juan Battaleme Martinez, 2009. "Posibles futuros: transición y cambio en la política internacional," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 396, Universidad del CEMA.
  40. Joana Andrade Vicente, 2021. "Tax us, if you can: a game theoretic approach to profit shifting within the European Union," Working Papers REM 2021/0206, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, REM, Universidade de Lisboa.
  41. Kristen Hopewell, 2021. "Power transitions and global trade governance: The impact of a rising China on the export credit regime," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 634-652, July.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.