IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intare/v8y2005i1p103-127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Theoretical Review: Neo-Liberal Institutionalism and the Co-Operative Security Regime in Northeast Asia

Author

Listed:
  • Sang-Gab Lee

Abstract

This article examines several theoretical ideas on security regime applicable to Northeast Asia. Different from realists or idealists, two schools of international relations theory, neo-liberal institutionalists have seen that anarchy and mixed interests occasionally cause states to suffer the opportunity costs of not achieving an outcome that is more mutually beneficial. In this context, the concept of co-operative security regime has important connotations for the concept of neo-liberal institutionalism. Based on the research outcome, the co-operative security concept appears to be the most applicable to Northeast Asia in that the idea is among the more widely used terms, complementing more traditional views, acknowledges a more inclusive definition of security, and challenges to security, encompassing, but moving beyond, the traditional notion of military threat and response. Beside of this reason, there are four more logics validating the application of the co-operative security regime notion to Northeast Asia.

Suggested Citation

  • Sang-Gab Lee, 2005. "Theoretical Review: Neo-Liberal Institutionalism and the Co-Operative Security Regime in Northeast Asia," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 8(1), pages 103-127, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:intare:v:8:y:2005:i:1:p:103-127
    DOI: 10.1177/223386590500800106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/223386590500800106
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/223386590500800106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stein, Arthur A., 1982. "Coordination and collaboration: regimes in an anarchic world," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(2), pages 299-324, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kenneth W. Abbott & Benjamin Faude, 2022. "Hybrid institutional complexes in global governance," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 263-291, April.
    2. Simon Schropp, 2007. "Revisiting the "Compliance-vs.-Rebalancing" Debate in WTO Scholarship a Unified Research Agenda," IHEID Working Papers 29-2007, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies, revised Dec 2007.
    3. Keck, Alexander & Schropp, Simon, 2007. "Indisputably essential: The economics of dispute settlement institutions in trade agreements," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2007-02, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    4. Michael C. Horowitz & Paul Poast & Allan C. Stam, 2017. "Domestic Signaling of Commitment Credibility," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 61(8), pages 1682-1710, September.
    5. Schneider, Volker & Werle, Raymund, 1988. "Regime oder korporativer Akteur? Die EG in der Telekommunikationspolitik," MPIfG Discussion Paper 88/4, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    6. David L. Rousseau, 2002. "Motivations for Choice," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 46(3), pages 394-426, June.
    7. Werle, Raymund, 2000. "Institutional aspects of standardization: Jurisdictional conflicts and choice of standardization organizations," MPIfG Discussion Paper 00/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    8. Ronald B. Mitchell, 1994. "9. Heterogeneities at Two Levels: States, Non-State Actors and Intentional Oil Pollution," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 6(4), pages 625-653, October.
    9. Kenneth W. Abbott & Duncan Snidal, 1998. "Why States Act through Formal International Organizations," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 42(1), pages 3-32, February.
    10. Tanja A. Börzel, 2011. "Comparative Regionalism - A New Research Agenda," KFG Working Papers p0028, Free University Berlin.
    11. Leonardo Baccini & Johannes Urpelainen, 2014. "Before ratification: understanding the timing of international treaty effects on domestic policies," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 50278, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Juan Battaleme Martinez, 2009. "Posibles futuros: transición y cambio en la política internacional," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 396, Universidad del CEMA.
    13. Pierre Berthaud & Tancrède Voituriez, 2013. "BASIC effect on global climate governance. Power changes and regime shifts," Post-Print halshs-00868468, HAL.
    14. Eric Reinhardt, 2001. "Adjudication without Enforcement in GATT Disputes," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 45(2), pages 174-195, April.
    15. Mark Irving Lichbach, 1990. "When Is an Arms Rivalry a Prisoner's Dilemma?," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 34(1), pages 29-56, March.
    16. Frank M Häge, 2020. "Allocating political attention in the EU’s foreign and security policy: The effect of supranational agenda-setters," European Union Politics, , vol. 21(4), pages 634-656, December.
    17. Catherine Figuière & Laëtitia Guilhot, 2010. "L'Asie d'une crise à l'autre : l'impact sur l'intégration régionale," Post-Print halshs-00493869, HAL.
    18. Zürn, Michael, 1993. "Problematic social situations and international institutions: on the use of game theory in international politics," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 63-84.
    19. Abbott, Kenneth W. & Faude, Benjamin, 2022. "Hybrid institutional complexes in global governance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 109882, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Rajnish Saryal, 2015. "Global Environmental Agenda: The Neoliberal Institutional Perspective," Jadavpur Journal of International Relations, , vol. 19(1), pages 1-21, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intare:v:8:y:2005:i:1:p:103-127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.hufs.ac.kr/user/hufsenglish/re_1.jsp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.