IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wzbior/spiii2008103.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Die postfossile Blackbox: Alternative Antriebsaggregate im Rückspiegel vergangener Verkehrsvorhaben

Author

Listed:
  • Scherf, Christan

Abstract

Innovative Expertensysteme stehen als Teil von sozio-technischen Konstellationen vor der Herausforderung, Neues mit Altem zu verbinden. Die bestehenden Konstellationen lassen sich dabei als Blackbox beschreiben, da sie unhinterfragt bleiben, so lange sie nicht von Experten problematisiert und neu verhandelt werden. Am Ende muss jedoch ein Beschluss erfolgen, um Sicherheit und Vertrauen gegenüber den Laien wieder herzustellen. Wissenschaftliche, technische und wirtschaftliche Experten des Verkehrsvorhabens Clean Urban Transport for Europe beziehen diese Blackbox-Eigenschaft mit ein. Sie versuchen, die Innovation der mobilen Brennstoffzelle nach dem Add-On-Prinzip in bestehende Infrastrukturen hinein zu implementieren, d.h. hergebrachte Eigenschaften des öffentlichen Busverkehrs, z.B. zentrale Betankung und planbarer Betrieb können weiterhin genutzt werden. Das Henne-Ei- Problem, dass keine Infrastruktur ohne Fahrzeug und kein Fahrzeug ohne Infrastruktur Sinn macht, soll so überwunden werden. Zwischen den Experten entsteht jedoch neuer Aushandlungsbedarf, was sich rückblickend am gescheiterten Projekt des französischen Elektrofahrzeugs zeigen lässt. Der wieder entdeckte Batteriebetrieb gilt heute zunehmend als Alternative zur Brennstoffzelle, was eine Schließung des Verhandlungsraumes zusätzlich erschwert.

Suggested Citation

  • Scherf, Christan, 2008. "Die postfossile Blackbox: Alternative Antriebsaggregate im Rückspiegel vergangener Verkehrsvorhaben," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Innovation and Organization SP III 2008-103, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbior:spiii2008103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/47944/1/587946377.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weider, Marc & Metzner, André & Rammler, Stephan, 2004. "Das Brennstoffzellen-Rennen: Aktivitäten und Strategien bezüglich Wasserstoff und Brennstoffzelle in der Automobilindustrie," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Innovation and Organization SP III 2004-101, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    2. Callon, M. & Laredo, P. & Rabeharisoa, V. & Gonard, T. & Leray, T., 1992. "The management and evaluation of technological programs and the dynamics of techno-economic networks: The case of the AFME," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 215-236, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aigle, Thomas & Krien, Philipp & Marz, Lutz, 2007. "Die Evaluations-Matrix: Ein Tool zur Bewertung antriebs- und kraftstoff-technologischer Innovationen in der Automobilindustrie," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Innovation and Organization SP III 2007-105, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    2. Weider, Marc, 2004. "China - Automobilmarkt der Zukunft? Wie nachhaltig und zukunftsorientiert sind die Strategien der internationalen Automobilindustrie in China?," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Innovation and Organization SP III 2004-105, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    3. Steinmueller, W. Edward, 2010. "Economics of Technology Policy," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 1181-1218, Elsevier.
    4. Penan, H., 1996. "R & D strategy in a techno-economic network: Alzheimer's disease therapeutic strategies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 337-358, May.
    5. Kinder, Tony, 2003. "Go with the flow--a conceptual framework for supply relations in the era of the extended enterprise," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 503-523, March.
    6. Hemert, P. van & Nijkamp, P., 2008. "Thematic research prioritization in the EU and the Netherlands: an assessment on the basis of content analysis," Serie Research Memoranda 0023, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    7. Martini, Stefan, 2006. "Gibt es ein subjektives Recht auf öffentlichen Verkehr? Grundrechte statt Daseinsvorsorge," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Innovation and Organization SP III 2006-103, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    8. Silvia Cruz & Sônia Paulino & Faïz Gallouj, 2015. "Public Service Innovation: Solid Waste Sector from the Perspective of Clean Development Mechanism Landfill Projects," Post-Print halshs-01247615, HAL.
    9. Beutler, Felix, 2004. "Intermodalität, Multimodalität und Urbanibility: Vision für einen nachhaltigen Stadtverkehr," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Innovation and Organization SP III 2004-107, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    10. Geels, Frank W., 2010. "Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 495-510, May.
    11. Blümel, Hermann, 2004. "Mobilitätsdienstleister ohne Kunden: Kundenorientierung im öffentlichen Nahverkehr," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Innovation and Organization SP III 2004-109, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    12. Miller, Peter & O'Leary, Ted, 2007. "Mediating instruments and making markets: Capital budgeting, science and the economy," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(7-8), pages 701-734.
    13. Canzler, Weert & Knie, Andreas, 2005. "Demografische und wirtschaftsstrukturelle Auswirkungen auf die künftige Mobilität: Neue Argumente für eine neue Wettbewerbsordnung im Öffentlichen Verkehr," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Innovation and Organization SP III 2005-106, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    14. Yuanyang Teng & Yicun Li & Xiaobo Wu, 2024. "Exploring the mechanism of path-creating strategy for latecomers: a combined approach of econometrics and causal machine learning," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Sundbo, Jon & Orfila-Sintes, Francina & Sorensen, Flemming, 2007. "The innovative behaviour of tourism firms--Comparative studies of Denmark and Spain," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 88-106, February.
    16. Prätorius, Gerhard & Wichert, Christian, 2004. "Die Ergänzung der Haushalts- durch Nutzerfinanzierung von Verkehrsinfrastrukturen," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Innovation and Organization SP III 2004-108, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    17. Ruth Schmitt, 2010. "Dealing with Wicked Issues: Open Strategizing and the Camisea Case," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 11-19, August.
    18. Sanz-Menendez, Luis & Cruz-Castro, Laura, 2003. "Coping with environmental pressures: public research organisations responses to funding crises," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1293-1308, September.
    19. Miller, Peter & Kurunmäki, Liisa & O'Leary, Ted, 2008. "Accounting, hybrids and the management of risk," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(7-8), pages 942-967.
    20. Benjamin Cabanes & Blanche Segrestin & Benoit Weil & Pascal Le Masson, 2014. "Understanding the Role of Collective Imaginary in the Dynamics of Expectations: The Space Industry Case Study," Post-Print hal-01010134, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbior:spiii2008103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzbbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.