IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wuewwb/119.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Mini- und Midijobs in Deutschland: Lohnsubventionierung ohne Beschäftigungseffekte?

Author

Listed:
  • Berthold, Norbert
  • Coban, Mustafa

Abstract

Mit der Einführung von Mini- und Midijobs kam es 2003 zur abschließenden Implementierung eines subventionierten Niedriglohnsektors in Deutschland. Zum 1. Januar 2013 wurden nun nach knapp 10 Jahren die Grenzregelungen dieser Beschäftigungsformen angepasst, um der zwischenzeitlichen Lohnentwicklung gerecht zu werden. In unserem Beitrag erläutern wir zunächst die theoretischen Wirkungskanäle von Lohnsubventionen und untersuchen hiernach mittels einer Metaanalyse der bisherigen Forschungsergebnisse die Effekte der Mini- und Midijobs auf die Beschäftigung. Für die beiden Beschäftigungstypen lassen sich jedoch nur bedingt positive Ergebnisse konstatieren. Sie bilden weder eine 'Brücke' aus der Arbeitslosigkeit in den Arbeitsmarkt noch dienen sie als 'Sprungbrett' in ein normales Beschäftigungsverhältnis. Aufbauend auf den arbeitsmarktpolitischen Schwächen der Mini- und Midijobs schlagen wir zwei Reformvarianten vor, welche diese Zielsetzungen im Bereich der niedrigen Einkommensniveaus erzielen können.

Suggested Citation

  • Berthold, Norbert & Coban, Mustafa, 2013. "Mini- und Midijobs in Deutschland: Lohnsubventionierung ohne Beschäftigungseffekte?," Discussion Paper Series 119, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Chair of Economic Order and Social Policy.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wuewwb:119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/71283/1/739830058.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:zbw:rwirep:0056 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Siebert, Horst & Stähler, Frank, 1994. "Sozialtransfer und Arbeitsangebot," Kiel Working Papers 648, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    3. Lawrence F. Katz, 1996. "Wage Subsidies for the Disadvantaged," NBER Working Papers 5679, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Layard, Richard & Nickell, Stephen & Jackman, Richard, 2005. "Unemployment: Macroeconomic Performance and the Labour Market," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199279173.
    5. Moffitt, Robert, 1985. "A problem with the negative income tax," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 261-265.
    6. Schneider, Hilmar & Zimmermann, Klaus F. & Bonin, Holger & Brenke, Karl & de New, John & Kempe, Wolfram, 2002. "Beschäftigungspotenziale einer dualen Förderstrategie im Niedriglohnbereich," IZA Research Reports 5, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Reinhard Hujer & Marco Caliendo, 2003. "Lohnsubventionen in Deutschland: wie sieht eine optimale Evaluierungsstrategie aus?," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 72(1), pages 109-123.
    8. Peichl, Andreas & Schneider, Hilmar & Siegloch, Sebastian, 2010. "Reform der Hinzuverdienstregeln in der Grundsicherung: Kein Entkommen aus der Transferfalle," IZA Standpunkte 26, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Freier, Ronny & Steiner, Viktor, 2008. "Marginal employment: Stepping stone or dead end? : evaluating the German experience," Zeitschrift für ArbeitsmarktForschung - Journal for Labour Market Research, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 41(2/3), pages 223-243.
    10. Marco Caliendo & Steffen Künn & Arne Uhlendorff, 2012. "Marginal Employment, Unemployment Duration and Job Match Quality," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1222, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    11. Fuest, Clemens & Huber, Bernd, 1998. "Eine beschäftigungsfreundliche Reform der 620-DM-Arbeitsverhältnisse," Wirtschaftsdienst – Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik (1949 - 2007), ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 78(11), pages 645-651.
    12. Schneider, Friedrich, 2008. "The Shadow Economy in Germany - A Blessing or a Curse for the Official Economy?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 89-111, March.
    13. Eichhorst, Werner & Hinz, Tina & Marx, Paul & Peichl, Andreas & Pestel, Nico & Siegloch, Sebastian & Thode, Eric & Tobsch, Verena, 2012. "Geringfügige Beschäftigung: Situation und Gestaltungsoptionen," IZA Research Reports 47, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Hermann Buslei & Viktor Steiner, 2003. "Anreizwirkungen von Lohnsubventionen: welche Bedeutung haben sie für die aktuelle Reformdiskussion?," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 72(1), pages 94-108.
    15. Freier, Ronny & Steiner, Viktor, 2008. "Marginal employment: Stepping stone or dead end? : evaluating the German experience," Zeitschrift für ArbeitsmarktForschung - Journal for Labour Market Research, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 41(2/3), pages 223-243.
    16. Jacobi, Lena & Schaffner, Sandra, 2008. "Does Marginal Employment Substitute Regular Employment? – A Heterogeneous Dynamic Labor Demand Approach for Germany," Ruhr Economic Papers 56, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    17. Voss, Dorothea & Weinkopf, Claudia, 2012. "Niedriglohnfalle Minijob," WSI-Mitteilungen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 65(1), pages 5-12.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matthias Collischon & Kamila Cygan-Rehm & Regina T. Riphahn, 2021. "Employment effects of payroll tax subsidies," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 1201-1219, October.
    2. Bachmann Ronald & Dürig Wolfgang & Frings Hanna & Höckel Lisa Sofie & Flores Fernanda Martinez, 2017. "Minijobs nach Einführung des Mindestlohns – Eine Bestandsaufnahme," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 66(3), pages 209-237, December.
    3. Ulrike Huemer & Rainer Eppel & Marion Kogler & Helmut Mahringer & Lukas Schmoigl & David Pichler, 2021. "Effektivität von Instrumenten der aktiven Arbeitsmarktpolitik in unterschiedlichen Konjunkturphasen," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 67250.
    4. Berthold, Norbert & Coban, Mustafa, 2015. "Mindestlöhne und Lohnsubventionen: Interaktionseffekte in den USA und in Deutschland [Minimum Wages and Wage Subsidies: Interaction Effects on Employment in the US and Germany]," Discussion Paper Series 129, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Chair of Economic Order and Social Policy.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Berthold Norbert & Coban Mustafa, 2013. "Mini- und Midijobs in Deutschland: Lohnsubventionierung ohne Beschäftigungseffekte? / Mini- and Midi-Jobs in Germany: Do Wage Subsidies have an Effect on Employment?," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 64(1), pages 289-324, January.
    2. Matthias Collischon & Kamila Cygan-Rehm & Regina T. Riphahn, 2021. "Employment effects of payroll tax subsidies," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 1201-1219, October.
    3. Berthold, Norbert & Coban, Mustafa, 2013. "Kombilohn oder Workfare? Wege aus der strukturellen Arbeitslosigkeit auf dem Prüfstand [Wage Subsidy or Workfare? Comparison of Two Designs to Reduce Structural Unemployment]," Discussion Paper Series 122, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Chair of Economic Order and Social Policy.
    4. Werner Eichhorst & Verena Tobsch, 2013. "Has Atypical Work Become Typical in Germany?: Country Case Studies on Labour Market Segmentation," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 596, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    5. Alexander Mosthaf & Thorsten Schank & Stefan Schwarz, 2024. "Do supplementary jobs for welfare recipients increase the chance of welfare exit? Evidence from Germany," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(3), pages 291-324, July.
    6. Bachmann Ronald & Dürig Wolfgang & Frings Hanna & Höckel Lisa Sofie & Flores Fernanda Martinez, 2017. "Minijobs nach Einführung des Mindestlohns – Eine Bestandsaufnahme," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 66(3), pages 209-237, December.
    7. Gabriela Galassi, 2021. "Labor Demand Response to Labor Supply Incentives: Lessons from the German Mini-Job Reform," Staff Working Papers 21-15, Bank of Canada.
    8. Lietzmann, Torsten & Schmelzer, Paul & Wiemers, Jürgen, 2016. "Does marginal employment promote regular employment for unemployed welfare benefit recipients in Germany?," IAB-Discussion Paper 201618, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    9. Eichhorst, Werner & Tobsch, Verena, 2013. "Has Atypical Work Become Typical in Germany?," IZA Discussion Papers 7609, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Galassi, Gabriela, 2021. "Labor Demand Response to Labor Supply Incentives: Lessons from the German Mini-Job Reform," IZA Discussion Papers 14248, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    11. Brown, Alessio J.G. & Merkl, Christian & Snower, Dennis J., 2011. "Comparing the effectiveness of employment subsidies," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 168-179, April.
    12. Hans-Werner Sinn & Christian Holzner & Wolfgang Meister & Wolfgang Ochel & Martin Werding, 2002. "Aktivierende Sozialhilfe - Ein Weg zu mehr Beschäftigung und Wachstum," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 55(09), pages 03-52, May.
    13. repec:pri:cepsud:158krueger is not listed on IDEAS
    14. John Van Reenen, 2004. "Active Labor Market Policies and the British New Deal for the Young Unemployed in Context," NBER Chapters, in: Seeking a Premier Economy: The Economic Effects of British Economic Reforms, 1980–2000, pages 461-496, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Kalwij, Adriaan, 2001. "Individuals' Unemployment Durations over the Business Cycle," IZA Discussion Papers 369, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Hirsch, Boris, 2015. "Dual Labour Markets at Work: The Impact of Employers' Use of Temporary Agency Work on Regular Workers' Job Stability," IZA Discussion Papers 8804, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Krebs, Tom & Scheffel, Martin, 2016. "Structural Reform in Germany," IZA Discussion Papers 9787, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    18. Laun, Lisa, 2019. "In-work benefits across Europe," Working Paper Series 2019:16, IFAU - Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy.
    19. Matteo Picchio & Mattia Filomena, 2021. "Are Temporary Jobs Stepping Stones Or Dead Ends? A Meta-Analytical Review Of The Literature," Working Papers 455, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    20. Brian Bell & Richard Blundell & John Reenen, 1999. "Getting the Unemployed Back to Work: The Role of Targeted Wage Subsidies," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 6(3), pages 339-360, August.
    21. Caliendo, Marco & Künn, Steffen & Uhlendorff, Arne, 2016. "Earnings exemptions for unemployed workers: The relationship between marginal employment, unemployment duration and job quality," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 177-193.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Lohnsubvention; Minijob; Midijob; Kombilohnmodell; Arbeitslosengeld II;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H25 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Business Taxes and Subsidies
    • H31 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - Household
    • J22 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Time Allocation and Labor Supply

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wuewwb:119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/viwuede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.